Literature DB >> 25664402

Persons with psychosis perceptions of participating in a lifestyle intervention.

Rikard Wärdig1, Margareta Bachrach-Lindström1, Sally Hultsjö2, Torbjörn Lindström1, Anniqa Foldemo1.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To describe how persons with psychosis perceive participation in a lifestyle intervention, and use these perceptions to present factors to for consideration in future interventions.
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome is common in persons with psychosis. A healthy lifestyle is the primary option for preventing and treating metabolic syndrome, which is why the importance of lifestyle interventions has come into focus among health care professionals. Identifying perceptions of participation in a lifestyle intervention can increase the understanding of how to design future interventions.
DESIGN: A qualitative, phenomenographic approach was selected, using semi-structured interviews.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 40 participants with a psychotic disorder, who had undergone a lifestyle intervention focusing on theoretical education in healthy eating and physical activities. The interviews were conducted in 2011 and 2012, six to seven months after the intervention had been completed.
RESULTS: The findings comprise three categories that emphasise the need for a moderate intervention level that facilitates participation and thereby social interactions among group members. The experience of success in the intervention supported the perception of oneself as a capable individual. However, it could also be the opposite, another experience of failure.
CONCLUSION: Content in moderation can facilitate participation, and participants can thereby achieve health benefits and find social contacts. In addition to physical activity and lifestyle habits, interventions should have a social focus and be continuous. Professional support is a prerequisite and should facilitate the participants' ability to mirror themselves against healthy people in society by introducing activities that ordinary people do. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Identifying perceptions of participation in a lifestyle intervention can increase the understanding of how to design and manage future interventions. This is also an aspect that is important to consider in everyday clinical practice.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lifestyle intervention; metabolic syndrome; nursing; perceptions; psychosis; qualitative method

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25664402     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  4 in total

1.  Learning, doing and sticking with it: A qualitative study on achieving clinically significant reduction in cardiovascular disease risk in a healthy lifestyle intervention for people with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Mark R Hawes; Madeline L Danforth; Nancy Jacquelyn Pérez-Flores; Lauren Bochicchio; Daniela Tuda; Ana Stefancic; Leopoldo J Cabassa
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2022-02-03

2.  Master's level mental health nursing competencies, a prerequisite for equal health among service users in mental health care.

Authors:  Henrika Jormfeldt; Louise Doyle; Heikki Ellilä; Mari Lahti; Agnes Higgins; Brian Keogh; Oonagh Meade; Theodore Stickley; Jan Sitvast; Ingela Skärsäter; Nina Kilkku
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2018

3.  Barriers to monitoring and management of cardiovascular and metabolic health of patients prescribed antipsychotic drugs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruba Azfr Ali; Zahraa Jalal; Vibhu Paudyal
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Mental health consumers' perspectives of physical health interventions: An integrative review.

Authors:  Tracy Samkele Tabvuma; Robert Stanton; Graeme Browne; Brenda Happell
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.100

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.