Literature DB >> 25664392

Contextual valence modulates the neural dynamics of risk processing.

Ya Zheng1,2,3, Qi Li1, Kai Wang1,2, Haiyan Wu1, Xun Liu1.   

Abstract

A well-known bias in risky decision making is that most people tend to be risk averse when gains are salient but risk seeking when losses are salient. The present study addressed the neural dynamics of this process by recording ERPs during a gambling task in a gain and a loss context. Behaviorally, participants were found to be risk averse in the gain context but risk neutral in the loss context. During the anticipation stage, an increased stimulus-preceding negativity was elicited by high- versus low-risk choices in the gain but not the loss context. During the outcome-appraisal stage, the feedback-related negativity was larger after high- versus low-risk choices in the gain instead of the loss context. For the P300, an outcome valence effect (a larger P300 for gain vs. loss outcomes) emerged following the high- versus low-risk decisions in the gain but not the loss context. Our findings suggest that risk processing can be modulated by the context of valence during the anticipation stage and by both the contextual valence and the outcome valence during the outcome-appraisal stage, which may be driven by the motivational salience imposed by the context of valence.
© 2015 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contextual valence; Feedback-related negativity; P300; Risk taking; Stimulus-preceding negativity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25664392     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Jiehui Zheng; Liang Meng
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Neural and Psychological Processes of Peer-Influenced Online Donation Decision: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Yuchen Ye; Pengtao Jiang; Wuke Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Stimulus-preceding negativity represents a conservative response tendency.

Authors:  Takahiro Hirao; Timothy I Murphy; Hiroaki Masaki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Event-Related Potentials in Relation to Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dilushi Chandrakumar; Daniel Feuerriegel; Stefan Bode; Megan Grech; Hannah A D Keage
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Contextual valence modulates the effect of choice on incentive processing.

Authors:  Shuting Mei; Wei Yi; Shiyu Zhou; Xun Liu; Ya Zheng
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.