Literature DB >> 2566391

Circulatory responses to laryngoscopy: the comparative effects of placebo, fentanyl and esmolol.

J P Ebert1, J D Pearson, S Gelman, C Harris, E L Bradley.   

Abstract

The circulatory response to a 30-second laryngoscopy followed by orotracheal intubation was recorded in 60 patients of ASA physical status III or IV undergoing a variety of non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients were randomly allocated to either the placebo, esmolol (500 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 X 6 minutes, followed by 300 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 X 9 minutes), or fentanyl (0.8 microgram.kg-1.min-1 X 10 minutes) group, and the observer was blinded to the infusion administered. Esmolol blunted the heart rate (HR) response, while fentanyl decreased it below the baseline and maintained it there, in spite of laryngoscopy. Similarly, fentanyl decreased the systolic (SBP), mean (MBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) significantly below the baseline, while these pressures were either retained at or elevated slightly above control in the esmolol group. In these doses, the HR response to laryngoscopy was more effectively blocked by fentanyl, while esmolol better retained perfusion pressure. There were no complications or ischaemic electrocardiographic changes in any patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2566391     DOI: 10.1007/BF03010769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  18 in total

1.  Circulatory changes during direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without prior lidocaine.

Authors:  R K Stoelting
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  E J Fox; G S Sklar; C H Hill; R Villanueva; B D King
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Acute intraoperative intracranial hypertension in neurosurgical patients: mechanical and pharmacologic factors.

Authors:  H M Shapiro; S R Wyte; A B Harris; A Galindo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Muscular, bronchomotor and cardiovascular reflexes elicited by mechanical stimulation of the respiratory tract.

Authors:  Z Tomori; J G Widdicombe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Blood pressure and heart rate changes during short-duration laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: influence of viscous or intravenous lidocaine.

Authors:  R K Stoelting
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1978 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Myocardial ischemia during non-cardiac surgical procedures in patients with coronary-artery disease.

Authors:  W L Roy; G Edelist; B Gilbert
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Cardiovascular effects of esmolol in anesthetized humans.

Authors:  P G Menkhaus; J G Reves; I Kissin; J M Alvis; A V Govier; P N Samuelson; W A Lell; C E Henling; E Bradley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Pulmonary hemodynamics during induction of anesthesia.

Authors:  M B Sorensen; E Jacobsen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Low-dose fentanyl blunts circulatory responses to tracheal intubation.

Authors:  D E Martin; H Rosenberg; S J Aukburg; R R Bartkowski; M W Edwards; D E Greenhow; P L Klineberg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Use of propranolol to control rate-pressure product during cardiac anesthesia.

Authors:  A M Safwat; J A Reitan; G R Misle; E J Hurley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Emergency management of the airway outside the operating room.

Authors:  D L Bogdonoff; D J Stone
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Bolus doses of esmolol for the prevention of perioperative hypertension and tachycardia.

Authors:  D Oxorn; J W Knox; J Hill
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Treatment with isoproterenol of bupivacaine toxicity.

Authors:  P Lacombe; G Blaise; F Plante; C Hollmann
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Effect of ONO-1101, a novel short-acting β-blocker on hemodynamic responses to isoflurane inhalation and tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hasuo; Shiro Tomiyasu; Minoru Hojo; Toru Fujigaki; Makoto Fukusaki; Koji Sumikawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Anesthesia.

Authors:  J Appleby; V A Lawrence
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Dual modulation of the T-cell receptor-activated signal transduction pathway by morphine in human T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Mizota; Hiroshi Tsujikawa; Takehiro Shoda; Kazuhiko Fukuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Low-dose remifentanil to modify hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation: comparison in normotensive and untreated/treated hypertensive Korean patients.

Authors:  Soo Jung Park; Yon-Hee Shim; Ji Hyun Yoo; Soon Ho Nam; Jong Wha Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-02-20

8.  Effect of the McGRATH MAC® Video Laryngoscope on Hemodynamic Response during Tracheal Intubation: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Masashi Yokose; Takahiro Mihara; Sayoko Kuwahara; Takahisa Goto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Comparative Study of Intravenous Esmolol, Labetalol and Lignocaine in Low Doses for Attenuation of Sympathomimetic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Ekta Ratnani; Om Prakash Sanjeev; Abhishek Singh; Manoj Tripathi; Hemant Kumar Chourasia
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

10.  Comparison of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine for Suppression of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study.

Authors:  Sandeep Sharma; Om Prakash Suthar; M L Tak; Abhilasha Thanvi; Naveen Paliwal; Rakesh Karnawat
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.