Literature DB >> 25663780

Learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy.

Jia-Qing Gong1, Yong-Kuan Cao1, Yong-Hua Wang1, Guo-Hu Zhang1, Pei-Hong Wang1, Guo-De Luo1.   

Abstract

AIM: To describe the learning curves of hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy (HALG) for the treatment of gastric cancer.
METHODS: The HALG surgical procedure consists of three stages: surgery under direct vision via the port for hand assistance, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, and gastrointestinal tract reconstruction. According to the order of the date of surgery, patients were divided into 6 groups (A-F) with 20 cases in each group. All surgeries were performed by the same group of surgeons. We performed a comprehensive and in-depth retrospective comparative analysis of the clinical data of all patients, with the clinical data including general patient information and intraoperative and postoperative observation indicators.
RESULTS: There were no differences in the basic information among the patient groups (P > 0.05). The operative time of the hand-assisted surgery stage in group A was 8-10 min longer than the other groups, with the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.01). There were no differences in total operative time between the groups (P = 0.30). Postoperative intestinal function recovery time in group A was longer than that of other groups (P = 0.02). Lengths of hospital stay and surgical quality indicators (such as intraoperative blood loss, numbers of detected lymph nodes, intraoperative side injury, postoperative complications, reoperation rate, and readmission rate 30 d after surgery) were not significantly different among the groups.
CONCLUSION: HALG is a surgical procedure that can be easily mastered, with a learning curve closely related to the operative time of the hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery stage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy; Learning curve; Operative time; Surgical quality indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663780      PMCID: PMC4316103          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

1.  [Analysis of lymph node dissection patterns in D2 radical gastrectomy by hand-assisted laparoscopic technique].

Authors:  Yong-kuan Cao; Li-ye Liu; Jia-qing Gong; Yong-hua Wang; Guo-de Luo; Jun Zhou; Wei Gan; Ling Huang
Journal:  Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2013-10

2.  Learning curve of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy-based analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoqiao Zhang; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A hand-assisted laparoscopic distal gastrectomy can be an effective way in obese patients.

Authors:  Guang-tan Zhang; Xue-dong Zhang
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.719

4.  Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical distal gastrectomy for obese patients.

Authors:  Guang-Tan Zhang; Dong Liang; Xue-Dong Zhang
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  American Society of Anesthesiologists class and Charlson's comorbidity index as predictors of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leak: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Wei Phin Tan; Vanessa A Talbott; Qi Quan Leong; Gerald A Isenberg; Scott D Goldstein
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  The role of hand-assisted laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y W Kim; J M Bae; J H Lee; K W Ryu; I J Choi; C G Kim; J S Lee; J Y Rho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Are there any disbenefits to patients in choosing laparoscopic gastrectomy by an expert in open gastrectomy? Aspects of surgical outcome and radicality of lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Seung Soo Lee; In Ho Kim
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: initial experience on hand-assisted technique and totally laparoscopic technique.

Authors:  Simon K H Wong; David Ka-Kin Tsui; Michael Ka-Wah Li
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  JiaQing Gong; YongKuan Cao; YunMing Li; GuoHu Zhang; PeiHong Wang; GuoDe Luo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weizhi Wang; Xiaoyu Zhang; Chen Shen; Xiaofei Zhi; Baolin Wang; Zekuan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic resection versus total laparoscopic gastric surgery for primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): an analysis from a high-volume institution.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Zhao; Yong-Qiang Qiu; Li-Ying Zhong; Wen-Ze Zheng; Lv-Ping Zhuang; Zhong Wei; Zhong-Liang Ning
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.030

2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced distal gastric cancer: final results of a single-center randomized study.

Authors:  Guode Luo; Qin Xiang; Xiaohua Wang; Yajiao Li; Yongkuan Cao; Jiaqing Gong; Yunming Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.573

3.  Reverse rolling-mat type lymph node dissection is the key step to solve the operative difficulties in hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yongkuan Cao; Tao Wang; Peng Shu; Long Cheng; Chuan Xie; Jun Zhou; Qianjun Yu; Xin Dai; Siping Chen; Qiang Wang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.