Literature DB >> 25663778

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy via a reverse-''V'' approach with four ports: initial experience and perioperative outcomes.

Zhao Liu1, Mu-Chuan Yu1, Rui Zhao1, Yan-Feng Liu1, Jian-Ping Zeng1, Xian-Qiang Wang1, Jing-Wang Tan1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) using a reverse-"V" approach with four ports.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of selected patients who underwent LPD at our center between April 2011 and April 2012. The following data were collected and reviewed: patient characteristics, tumor histology, surgical outcome, resection margins, morbidity, and mortality. All patients were thoroughly evaluated preoperatively by complete hematologic investigations, triple-phase helical computed tomography, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and biopsy of ampullary lesions (when present). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was performed for doubtful cases of lower common bile duct lesions.
RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality. LPD was performed with tumor-free margins in all patients, including patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 6), ampullary carcinoma (n = 6), intra-ductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (n = 2), pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma (n = 2), pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (n = 3), and bile duct cancer (n = 2). The mean patient age was 65 years (range, 42-75 years). The median blood loss was 240 mL, and the mean operative time was 368 min.
CONCLUSION: LPD using a reverse-"V" approach can be performed safely and yields good results in elective patients. Our preliminary experience showed that LDP can be performed via a reverse-"V" approach. This approach can be used to treat localized malignant lesions irrespective of histopathology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indications; Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; Operation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663778      PMCID: PMC4316101          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  28 in total

1.  Laparoscopic assisted duodenopancreatectomy.

Authors:  C Staudacher; E Orsenigo; P Baccari; S Di Palo; S Crippa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas head disease.

Authors:  Yasutoshi Kimura; Koichi Hirata; Mitsuhiro Mukaiya; Toru Mizuguchi; Kazumitsu Koito; Tadashi Katsuramaki
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Mabrut; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Juan Santiago Azagra; Claudio Bassi; Georges Delvaux; Joseph Weerts; Jean-Michel Fabre; Jean Boulez; Jacques Baulieux; Jean-Louis Peix; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Recent developments in surgery: minimally invasive approaches for patients requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Scott A Zenoni; J Pablo Arnoletti; Sebastian G de la Fuente
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases.

Authors:  J L Dulucq; P Wintringer; A Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of common bile duct: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Min-Hua Zheng; Bo Feng; Ai-Guo Lu; Jian-Wen Li; Wei-Guo Hu; Ming-Liang Wang; Lu Zang; Feng Dong; Zhi-Hai Mao; Yuan-Fei Peng; Yu Jiang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2006-05-29

7.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  K C Conlon; D Labow; D Leung; A Smith; W Jarnagin; D G Coit; N Merchant; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: Is it worthwhile?

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to treat cancer of the ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  Bangyu Lu; Xiaoyong Cai; Wenqi Lu; Yubing Huang; Xiaojian Jin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chien-Hung Liao; Yu-Tung Wu; Yu-Yin Liu; Shang-Yu Wang; Shih-Ching Kang; Chun-Nan Yeh; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Nomogram and a predictive model for postoperative hemorrhage in preoperative patients of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodectomy.

Authors:  Dongrui Li; Chengxu Du; Jiansheng Zhang; Zhongqiang Xing; Jianhua Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Xiao-Long Liu; Guang-Yi Jiang; Di Wu; Hendi Maher; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Miljana Vladimirov; Dirk Bausch; Hubert J Stein; Tobias Keck; Ulrich Wellner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.