Literature DB >> 25663282

Modifications of sequential designs in bioequivalence trials.

Cheng Zheng1, Lihui Zhao1, Jixian Wang2.   

Abstract

Bioequivalence (BE) studies are designed to show that two formulations of one drug are equivalent and they play an important role in drug development. When in a design stage, it is possible that there is a high degree of uncertainty on variability of the formulations and the actual performance of the test versus reference formulation. Therefore, an interim look may be desirable to stop the study if there is no chance of claiming BE at the end (futility), or claim BE if evidence is sufficient (efficacy), or adjust the sample size. Sequential design approaches specially for BE studies have been proposed previously in publications. We applied modification to the existing methods focusing on simplified multiplicity adjustment and futility stopping. We name our method modified sequential design for BE studies (MSDBE). Simulation results demonstrate comparable performance between MSDBE and the original published methods while MSDBE offers more transparency and better applicability. The R package MSDBE is available at https://sites.google.com/site/modsdbe/.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  adaptive design; bioequivalence; sample size re-estimation; sequential design

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663282     DOI: 10.1002/pst.1672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  2 in total

1.  Two-Stage Adaptive Designs for Three-Treatment Bioequivalence Studies.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Adrian P Mander; James M S Wason
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.452

2.  10th Anniversary of a Two-Stage Design in Bioequivalence. Why Has it Still Not Been Implemented?

Authors:  Michał Kaza; Alexander Sokolovskyi; Piotr J Rudzki
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.200

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.