Literature DB >> 25663278

Larger femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density decrease following total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture than for osteoarthritis: a prospective, observational cohort study.

Tobias Mann1, Thomas Eisler, Henrik Bodén, Olle Muren, André Stark, Mats Salemyr, Olof Sköldenberg.   

Abstract

Studies on patients with degenerative joint disease of the hip show that femoral periprosthetic bone mineral decreases following total hip arthroplasty. Scarcely any osteodensitometric data exist on femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients and periprosthetic bone remodelling. In two parallel cohorts we enrolled 87 patients (mean age, 72 ± 12 years; male:female ratio, 30:57) undergoing total hip arthroplasty for either primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip (n = 37) or for an acute FNF (n = 50) and followed them for a mean of 5.4 years. Outcomes were bone mineral density (BMD) changes in the periprosthetic Gruen zones 1-7, the incidence of periprosthetic fractures and clinical outcome. The bone mineral loss in the fracture group was more than twice that of the osteoarthritis group, -16.9% versus -6.8% (p = 0.004). The incidence of periprosthetic fractures was 12% (6/50) in the fracture cohort compared with none (0%) in the OA cohort (p = 0.03). Periprosthetic bone mineral loss following total hip arthroplasty is significantly greater in patients who are treated for acute FNF than in OA patients. This decrease of BMD follows a different pattern with the FNF patients losing larger proportions of bone in Gruen zones 1, 2, 6, and 7 while the OA patients tend to have larger losses only in zones 1 and 7.
© 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; femoral neck fracture; osteoarthritis; periprosthetic fracture; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663278     DOI: 10.1002/jor.22783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  6 in total

1.  Perioperative patient-specific factors-based nomograms predict short-term periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guangtao Fu; Mengyuan Li; Yunlian Xue; Qingtian Li; Zhantao Deng; Yuanchen Ma; Qiujian Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christos Bissias; Angelos Kaspiris; Athanasios Kalogeropoulos; Konstantinos Papoutsis; Nikolaos Natsioulas; Konstantinos Barbagiannis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Olga D Savvidou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 3.  A Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Comparison in FNF and OA Patients.

Authors:  Jakub Szczesiul; Marek Bielecki
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-09-17

4.  Histological study of atraumatic periprosthetic fractures: does atypical periprosthetic fracture exist?

Authors:  Vanna Bottai; Gaia De Paola; Fabio Celli; Ilaria Lazzerini; Valerio Ortenzi; Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato; Giulio Guido; Rodolfo Capanna; Stefano Giannotti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-10-25

5.  Bone Loss Following Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture.

Authors:  Mert Murat; Cenk Ermutlu; Ethem Ayhan Unkar; Sertaç Topalhafızoglu; Ahmet Şenel; Yusuf Öztürkmen
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 6.  A Review on Bone Mineral Density Loss in Total Knee Replacements Leading to Increased Fracture Risk.

Authors:  M Gundry; S Hopkins; K Knapp
Journal:  Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-10-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.