Literature DB >> 25662873

Progress testing: critical analysis and suggested practices.

Mark Albanese1, Susan M Case2.   

Abstract

Educators have long lamented the tendency of students to engage in rote memorization in preparation for tests rather than engaging in deep learning where they attempt to gain meaning from their studies. Rote memorization driven by objective exams has been termed a steering effect. Progress testing (PT), in which a comprehensive examination sampling all of medicine is administered repeatedly throughout the entire curriculum, was developed with the stated aim of breaking the steering effect of examinations and of promoting deep learning. PT is an approach historically linked to problem-based learning (PBL) although there is a growing recognition of its applicability more broadly. The purpose of this article is to summarize the salient features of PT drawn from the literature, provide a critical review of these features based upon the same literature and psychometric considerations drawn from the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and provide considerations of what should be part of best practices in applying PT from an evidence-based and a psychometric perspective.

Keywords:  Formative assessment; High stakes assessment; Longitudinal assessment; Progress testing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25662873     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9587-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  7 in total

1.  Introducing Summative Progress Testing in Radiology Residency: Little Change in Residents' Test Results After Transitioning from Formative Progress Testing.

Authors:  D R Rutgers; J P J van Schaik; C L J J Kruitwagen; C Haaring; W van Lankeren; A F van Raamt; O Ten Cate
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-05-13

2.  Toward a better judgment of item relevance in progress testing.

Authors:  Xandra M C Janssen-Brandt; Arno M M Muijtjens; Dominique M A Sluijsmans
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Resident and Faculty Attitudes Toward the Dutch Radiology Progress Test as It Transitions from a Formative to a Summative Measure of Licensure Eligibility.

Authors:  D R Rutgers; J P J van Schaik; W van Lankeren; F van Raamt; Th J Ten Cate
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2018-08-17

4.  Fourteen years of progress testing in radiology residency training: experiences from The Netherlands.

Authors:  D R Rutgers; F van Raamt; W van Lankeren; C J Ravesloot; A van der Gijp; Th J Ten Cate; J P J van Schaik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Do students achieve the desired learning goals using open-book formative assessments?

Authors:  Stefan P Minder; David Weibel; Bartholomäus Wissmath; Felix M Schmitz
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Assessing the growth in clinical skills using a progress clinical skills examination.

Authors:  Heather S Laird-Fick; Chi Chang; Ling Wang; Carol Parker; Robert Malinowski; Matthew Emery; David J Solomon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Motivations of assessment item writers in medical programs: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sowmiya Karthikeyan; Elizabeth O'Connor; Wendy Hu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.