Literature DB >> 25662861

Comparison of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogenosulfate and clopidogrel besylate in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Michalis Hamilos1, Ilias Saloustros, Emmanuel Skalidis, Nikolaos Igoumenidis, Marios Kambouris, Grigorios Chlouverakis, Despina Vougia, Ioannis Loggakis, Panos E Vardas, George Kochiadakis.   

Abstract

It is well known that patients with poor response to antiplatelet therapy are most likely to have more thrombotic events. Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (CHS) is a thienopyridine acting as an important antiplatelet agent alone or in combination with acetylsalicylic acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. A different clopidogrel salt, clopidogrel besylate (CB), was recently approved as a generic drug for the same purpose while data about its antiplatelet effect are very scarce. Our study compared the antiplatelet effect of CHS and CB in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Patients with stable coronary artery disease (n = 101) (coronary lesions defined angiographically 30-70 %) were randomized to either CHS (n = 50) or CB (n = 51). After randomization a 600 mg loading dose of the drug was given and monitoring of antiplatelet effect was done 12-14 h later with VerifyNow assay. Antiplatelet response was measured with P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and % inhibition P2Y12 from baseline (% inhibition P2Y12). Moreover CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3 and CYP3Α5 polymorphisms were studied in all patients. Clinical characteristics were similar between the two study groups. No significant difference was observed for baseline platelet reactivity between CHS and CB patients (258 ± 38 vs. 256 ± 38 respectively, p = 0.79). No difference was found for antiplatelet response between the CHS and the CB group, assessed by PRU (195 ± 74 vs. 204 ± 67 respectively, p = 0.51) and by % inhibition P2Y12 (24 ± 25 vs. 24 ± 22 % respectively, p = 0.95). Number of heterozygotes for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was comparable and their platelet reactivity was similar between the two study groups. Our results indicate that both CB and CHS had an identical antiplatelet effect in patients with stable coronary artery disease. No difference on platelet reactivity of heterozygotes for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was found between the two study groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25662861     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-015-1173-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  23 in total

1.  Increased risk of atherothrombotic events associated with cytochrome P450 3A5 polymorphism in patients taking clopidogrel.

Authors:  Jung-Won Suh; Bon-Kwon Koo; Shu-Ying Zhang; Kyung-Woo Park; Joo-Youn Cho; In-Jin Jang; Dong-Soon Lee; Dae-Won Sohn; Myoung-Mook Lee; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an emerging clinical entity.

Authors:  Thomas H Wang; Deepak L Bhatt; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Monitoring platelet inhibition after clopidogrel with the VerifyNow-P2Y12(R) rapid analyzer: the VERIfy Thrombosis risk ASsessment (VERITAS) study.

Authors:  Alex Malinin; Alex Pokov; Malcolm Spergling; Anthony Defranco; Kenneth Schwartz; Dianne Schwartz; Ehtisham Mahmud; Dan Atar; Victor Serebruany
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  The effect of clopidogrel besylate and clopidogrel hydrogensulfate on platelet aggregation in patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Balazs Borsiczky; Zsolt Sarszegi; Attila Konyi; Sandor Szabados; Balazs Gaszner
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 5.  Clinical impact of genetically determined platelet reactivity.

Authors:  Marc Laine; Sébastien Arméro; Michaël Peyrol; Pascal Sbragia; Franck Thuny; Franck Paganelli; Laurent Bonello
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven R Steinhubl; Peter B Berger; J Tift Mann; Edward T A Fry; Augustin DeLago; Charles Wilmer; Eric J Topol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation.

Authors:  S Yusuf; F Zhao; S R Mehta; S Chrolavicius; G Tognoni; K K Fox
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Shlomi Matetzky; Boris Shenkman; Victor Guetta; Michael Shechter; Roy Beinart; Roy Bienart; Ilan Goldenberg; Ilya Novikov; Hanna Pres; Naphtali Savion; David Varon; Hanoch Hod
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparing the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogensulfate and clopidogrel besylate: a crossover study.

Authors:  Horst Neubauer; Jan Christopher Krüger; Sebastian Lask; Heinz G Endres; Fenena Pepinghege; Andreas Engelhardt; Daniel Bulut; Andreas Mügge
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 in the Greek population.

Authors:  Kostas Arvanitidis; Georgia Ragia; Maria Iordanidou; Sofia Kyriaki; Athanasia Xanthi; Anna Tavridou; Vangelis G Manolopoulos
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.748

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of 4 different strategies of DAPT after PCI in ACS real world population from a Northern Italy registry.

Authors:  Marta Rasia; Emilia Solinas; Massimiliano Marino; Paolo Guastaroba; Alberto Menozzi; Maria Alberta Cattabiani; Iacopo Tadonio; Rossana De Palma; Luigi Vignali
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Are Generic Drugs Used in Cardiology as Effective and Safe as their Brand-name Counterparts? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacinthe Leclerc; Magalie Thibault; Jennifer Midiani Gonella; Claudia Beaudoin; John Sampalis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.