Literature DB >> 25662008

Confounding, effect modification, and the odds ratio: common misinterpretations.

Ian Shrier1, Menglan Pang2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25662008      PMCID： PMC4882164          DOI： 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN： 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Understanding the relationship between risks and odds ratios.

Authors:  Ian Shrier; Russell Steele
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.638

2.  The relationship between cigarette smoking and perceived dental treatment needs in the United States, 1988-1994.

Authors:  Bruce A Dye; Nathalie M Morin; Valerie Robison
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Randomized trial of lottery-based incentives to improve warfarin adherence.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel; Andrea B Troxel; George Loewenstein; Colleen M Brensinger; Jane Jaskowiak; Jalpa A Doshi; Mitchell Laskin; Kevin Volpp
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Mixing of confounding and non-collapsibility: a notable deficiency of the odds ratio.

Authors:  Menglan Pang; Jay S Kaufman; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Subgroup analysis in randomized controlled trials appeared to be dependent on whether relative or absolute effect measures were used.

Authors:  Roderick P Venekamp; Maroeska M Rovers; Arno W Hoes; Mirjam J Knol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Appraising the evidence: applying sex- and gender-based analysis (SGBA) to Cochrane systematic reviews on cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Marion Doull; Vivien E Runnels; Sari Tudiver; Madeline Boscoe
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  A note on the covariance of the Mantel-Haenszel log-odds-ratio estimator and the sample marginal rates.

Authors:  P W Holland
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Relationships of occupational and non-occupational physical activity to abdominal obesity.

Authors:  J A Steeves; D R Bassett; D L Thompson; E C Fitzhugh
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.095
View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of statistical approaches dealing with time-dependent confounding in drug effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Mohammad Ehsanul Karim; John Petkau; Paul Gustafson; Robert W Platt; Helen Tremlett
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Association of Childhood Adversity With Morbidity and Mortality in US Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucinda Rachel Grummitt; Noah T Kreski; Stephanie Gyuri Kim; Jonathan Platt; Katherine M Keyes; Katie A McLaughlin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 26.796

3.  Unopposed estrogen and endometrial cancer: association or causation?

Authors:  Andrea LaCroix; Velimir Šimunić; Slobodan Vukičević
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  Individual participant data meta-analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant-level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning.

Authors:  Richard D Riley; Thomas P A Debray; David Fisher; Miriam Hattle; Nadine Marlin; Jeroen Hoogland; Francois Gueyffier; Jan A Staessen; Jiguang Wang; Karel G M Moons; Johannes B Reitsma; Joie Ensor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessing the reporting of Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika to the National Surveillance System in Colombia from 2014-2017: A Capture-recapture analysis accounting for misclassification of arboviral diagnostics.

Authors:  Mabel Carabali; Gloria I Jaramillo-Ramirez; Vivian A Rivera; Neila-Julieth Mina Possu; Berta N Restrepo; Kate Zinszer
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Does the global activity limitation indicator measure participation restriction? Data from the European Health and Social Integration Survey in Spain.

Authors:  Julio Cabrero-García; Juan Ramón Rico-Juan; Antonio Oliver-Roig
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.440
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.