Literature DB >> 25661580

Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer.

Masatsugu Hamaji1, Fengshi Chen1, Yukinori Matsuo2, Atsushi Kawaguchi3, Satoshi Morita3, Nami Ueki2, Makoto Sonobe1, Yasushi Nagata4, Masahiro Hiraoka2, Hiroshi Date5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous comparative reports of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) suffered from short follow-up, mixed extents of resection and inclusion of benign lesion. We aimed to make comparisons of long-term outcomes between a pure series of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and SBRT for biopsy-proven clinical stage I NSCLC.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), local control, regional lymph node (LN) control, and distant control between VATS lobectomy (n = 413) and SBRT (n = 104) for biopsy-proven clinical stage I NSCLC at our institution between 2003 and 2009. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the confounding effects in estimating treatment hazard ratios. Forty-one VATS lobectomy patients and 41 SBRT patients were matched blinded to outcome (1:1 ratio, caliper distance; 0.5).
RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the follow-up period of the whole cohort ranged from 5 to 120 months with a median of 48. After propensity score matching there were significant differences in OS (p = 0.0016), CSS (p = 0.0015), RFS (p < 0.0001), local control (p = 0.0019), and distant control (p < 0.0001) and no significant difference in regional LN control (p = 0.11). The VATS lobectomy patients and SBRT patients had 68.5% and 37.3% of 5-year OS, 83.5% and 56.7% of 5-year CSS, and 60.4% and 19.5% of 5-year RFS, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest VATS lobectomy may offer significantly more favorable long-term outcomes than SBRT in potentially operable patients with biopsy-proven clinical stage I NSCLC.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25661580     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  28 in total

1.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer.

Authors:  Javier Aragón; Itzell Perez; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Combined Aortic Resection and Stent Graft Insertion for Local Recurrence of Metastatic Lung Carcinoma Following Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Hitoshi Dejima; Noriyuki Matsutani; Tomohiro Imazuru; Shigeki Morita; Yusuke Takahashi; Tomoki Shimokawa; Masafumi Kawamura
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  A Nomogram to Predict Recurrence and Survival of High-Risk Patients Undergoing Sublobar Resection for Lung Cancer: An Analysis of a Multicenter Prospective Study (ACOSOG Z4032).

Authors:  Michael S Kent; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Rodney Landreneau; Francis Nichols; Nathan R Foster; Thomas A DiPetrillo; Bryan Meyers; Dwight E Heron; David R Jones; Angelina D Tan; Sandra Starnes; Joe B Putnam; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Surgery versus SABR for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: the moving target of equipoise.

Authors:  Houda Bahig; Hanbo Chen; Alexander V Louie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Collaborating to assess the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy in medically operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lorraine D Cornwell; Drew Moghanaki
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy for elderly stage I lung cancer? A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Takuro Miyazaki; Takuya Yamazaki; Daisuke Nakamura; Shuntaro Sato; Naoya Yamasaki; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Keitaro Matsumoto; Ryotaro Kamohara; Go Hatachi; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy is not replacing surgery in the treatment of early stage lung cancer yet.

Authors:  Haifeng Wang
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2015-07-08

8.  Surgery compared to stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: better, equivalent or worse?

Authors:  Paul E Van Schil
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  A systematic review of outcomes following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the treatment of early-stage primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Murray; Kevin Franks; Gerard G Hanna
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Daniel Wang; Caroline Chung; David Tian; Andreas Rimner; James Huang; David R Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.