Literature DB >> 25661576

Single Institution Experience With Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Emphasizing Strategies for Coronary Protection.

Daniele Camboni1, Andreas Holzamer2, Bernhard Flörchinger2, Kurt Debl3, Dierk Endeman3, York Zausig4, Lars S Maier3, Christof Schmid2, Michael Hilker2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) implantation evolved as a therapeutic alternative, despite an increased risk of coronary obstruction in comparison with a regular transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We report a comprehensive single-institution experience emphasizing strategies to reduce the risk of myocardial ischemia.
METHODS: Since 2009, 639 patients underwent a TAVI procedure in our institution. All patients are prospectively collected into an institutional registry. In total 31 patients underwent a VIV procedure at our institution (age 77.8 ± 6.3 years; The Society or Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality 20.9% ± 8.8%; New York Heart Association (NYHA) 3.0 ± 0.6). Degenerated bioprostheses included 24 Mitroflow, 6 Edwards Perimount, and Cryo-Valve O' Brien with label sizes from 21 to 27 mm. The type of failure was mostly regurgitation with or without concomitant stenosis (78%).
RESULTS: Patients were provided with 5 Medtronic CoreValves, 15 Edwards SapienXT, 1 Edwards Sapien 3, 7 Medtronic Engager, and 3 Symetis Acurate TA valves. The procedural success rate was 88%. The left main stem was occluded in 1 patient (Sapien XT 26 in a Mitroflow 25 mm) who underwent emergent revascularization. Two patients suffering from a degenerated Mitroflow prosthesis needed a second valve (Sapien XT). Two patients with a degenerated Mitroflow prosthesis treated with a Sapien XT developed postprocedural myocardial ischemia and deceased on postoperative days 1 and 2, accounting to an overall incidence of coronary insufficiency associated to the VIV procedure of 10%. With the introduction of valves allowing commissural alignment (Acurate TA) and leaflet capturing as well (Engager) no further coronary insufficiency occurred. The mean gradient decreased significantly from 39.3 ± 14.0 to 16.1 ± 7.2 mm Hg (p = 0.002). Post-procedural regurgitation was classified as trace in 7 patients (23%) and moderate in 4 patients (13%). The 30-day survival was 77% with a significantly improved NYHA class of 1.79 ± 0.58 (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Jeopardizing coronary blood flow is likely in stenotic and calcified bioprostheses, particularly in tubelike aortic sinuses. Planning, imaging, and the use of valves allowing commissural alignment as well as leaflet capturing seem to reduce the risk. Further studies are necessary to support this hypothesis.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25661576     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus reoperative conventional aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Dong-Fang Zhao; Nelson Wang; Ya Ruth Huo; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Recurrent severe aortic stenosis one year after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation: Successful treatment with balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

Authors:  Abbasali Badami; Entela B Lushaj; Kurt Jacobson; Amish Raval; Lucian Lozonschi; Takushi Kohmoto
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2016-04-16

3.  Balloon-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses: clinical and echocardiographic long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Victor X Mosquera; Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera; Yago Vilela-González; Carlos Velasco; Jorge Salgado-Fernández; Ramón Calviño-Santos; Nicolás Vázquez-González; José M Vázquez-Rodríguez; José M Herrera-Noreña
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

4.  A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.

Authors:  Charles H Choi; Vivian Cheng; Diego Malaver; Neal Kon; Edward H Kincaid; Sanjay K Gandhi; Robert J Applegate; David X M Zhao
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Mitroflow Aortic Bioprosthesis Failure in Type B Aortic Dissection: Preventive Left Main Stenting in Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Strategy.

Authors:  Giovanni Alfonso Chiariello; Emmanuel Villa; Antonio Messina; Stefano Marwan Mangini; Massimiliano Rozzi; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Ornella Leonzi; Giovanni Troise
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2018-04-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.