Literature DB >> 25661575

Conveying uncertainty in prognosis to patients with ESRD.

Sanah Parvez1, Khaled Abdel-Kader, Mi-Kyung Song, Mark Unruh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognosis is a component of medical practice imbued with uncertainty. In nephrology, where mortality rates of elderly patients on dialysis are comparable to those of cancer patients, the implications of prognosis are unavoidable. Yet while most patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) desire to hear their prognosis, many nephrologists balk at this prospect in part owing to the uncertainty inherent in prognostic estimates.
SUMMARY: In this review, the concept of 'uncertainty' in clinical practice is considered from physician and patient perspectives. From the training perspective, providers learn that uncertainty is inescapable in medicine and develop strategies to manage its presence, including the avoidance of communicating uncertainty to their patients. This presages infrequent discussions of prognosis, which in turn influence patient preferences for treatments that have little therapeutic benefits. A general approach to conveying prognostic uncertainty to ESRD patients includes confronting our own emotional reaction to uncertainty, learning how to effectively communicate uncertainty to our patients, and using an effective interdisciplinary team approach to demonstrate an ongoing commitment to our patients despite the presence of prognostic uncertainty. KEY MESSAGES: Uncertainty in prognosis is inevitable. Once providers learn to incorporate it into their discussions of prognosis and collaborate with their ESRD patients, such discussions can foster trust and reduce anxiety for both sides.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25661575     DOI: 10.1159/000368954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Purif        ISSN: 0253-5068            Impact factor:   2.614


  5 in total

1.  Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5.

Authors:  Andrei D Javier; Rocio Figueroa; Edward D Siew; Huzaifah Salat; Jennifer Morse; Thomas G Stewart; Rakesh Malhotra; Manisha Jhamb; Jane O Schell; Cesar Y Cardona; Cathy A Maxwell; T Alp Ikizler; Khaled Abdel-Kader
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Shared decision-making in end-stage renal disease: a protocol for a multi-center study of a communication intervention to improve end-of-life care for dialysis patients.

Authors:  Nwamaka D Eneanya; Sarah L Goff; Talaya Martinez; Natalie Gutierrez; Jamie Klingensmith; John L Griffith; Casey Garvey; Jenny Kitsen; Michael J Germain; Lisa Marr; Joan Berzoff; Mark Unruh; Lewis M Cohen
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 3.  Discussions during shared decision-making in older adults with advanced renal disease: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rajesh Raj; Srivathsan Thiruvengadam; Kiran Deep Kaur Ahuja; Mai Frandsen; Matthew Jose
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Discussing brain magnetic resonance imaging results for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with hypothermia: A challenge for clinicians and parents.

Authors:  Ariel Cascio; Amaryllis Ferrand; Eric Racine; Marie St-Hilaire; Priscille-Nice Sanon; Andreea Gorgos; Pia Wintermark
Journal:  eNeurologicalSci       Date:  2022-09-11

5.  Predicting 3-Year Survival in Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: An External Validation of iChoose Kidney in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Vivian S Tan; Amit X Garg; Eric McArthur; Rachel E Patzer; Jennifer Gander; Pavel Roshanov; S Joseph Kim; Greg A Knoll; Seychelle Yohanna; Megan K McCallum; Kyla L Naylor
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2018-10-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.