Literature DB >> 25660544

Dynamic tuning of tactile localization to body posture.

Elena Azañón1, Max-Philipp Stenner2, Flavia Cardini3, Patrick Haggard4.   

Abstract

Localizing touch in space is essential for goal-directed action. Because body posture changes, the brain must transform tactile coordinates from an initial skin-based representation to external space by integrating information about current posture. This process, referred to as tactile remapping, generally results in accurate localization, but accuracy drops when skin-based and external spatial representations of touch are conflicting, e.g., after crossing the limbs. Importantly, frequent experience of such postures can improve localization. This suggests that remapping may not only integrate current sensory input but also prior experience. Here, we demonstrate that this can result in rapid changes in localization performance over the course of few trials. We obtained an implicit measure of tactile localization by studying the perceived temporal order of two touches, one on each hand. Crucially, we varied the number of consecutive trials during which participants held their arms crossed or uncrossed. As expected, accuracy dropped immediately after the arms had been crossed. Importantly, this was followed by a progressive recovery if posture was maintained, despite the absence of performance feedback. Strikingly, a significant improvement was already evident in the localization of the second pair of touches. This rapid improvement required preceding touch in the same posture and did not occur merely as a function of time. Moreover, even touches that were not task relevant led to improved localization of subsequent touch. Our findings show that touches are mapped from skin to external space as a function of recent tactile experience.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25660544     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  Integration of anatomical and external response mappings explains crossing effects in tactile localization: A probabilistic modeling approach.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Tobias Heed; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Relative contributions of visual and auditory spatial representations to tactile localization.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Mark Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  The development of body representations: an associative learning account.

Authors:  Carina C J M de Klerk; Maria Laura Filippetti; Silvia Rigato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Do motor plans affect sensorimotor state estimates during temporal decision-making with crossed vs. uncrossed hands? Failure to replicate the dynamic crossed-hand effect.

Authors:  Theodore Ching-Kong Cheung; Lin Lawrence Guo; Adam Frost; Christina F Pereira; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Towards explaining spatial touch perception: Weighted integration of multiple location codes.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Tobias Heed
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Disentangling the External Reference Frames Relevant to Tactile Localization.

Authors:  Tobias Heed; Jenny Backhaus; Brigitte Röder; Stephanie Badde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceptually relevant remapping of human somatotopy in 24 hours.

Authors:  James Kolasinski; Tamar R Makin; John P Logan; Saad Jbabdi; Stuart Clare; Charlotte J Stagg; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.

Authors:  Jonathan T W Schubert; Stephanie Badde; Brigitte Röder; Tobias Heed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Influence of transient spatial attention on the P3 component and perception of painful and non-painful electric stimuli in crossed and uncrossed hands positions.

Authors:  Karolina Świder; Eligiusz Wronka; Joukje M Oosterman; Clementina M van Rijn; Marijtje L A Jongsma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Frequency tagging of steady-state evoked potentials to explore the crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.

Authors:  Elisabeth Colon; Valéry Legrain; Gan Huang; André Mouraux
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.