Literature DB >> 25660196

Use of binaural and monaural cues to identify the lateral position of a virtual object using echoes.

Daniel Rowan1, Timos Papadopoulos2, David Edwards2, Robert Allen2.   

Abstract

Under certain conditions, sighted and blind humans can use echoes to discern characteristics of otherwise silent objects. Previous research concluded that robust horizontal-plane object localisation ability, without using head movement, depends on information above 2 kHz. While a strong interaural level difference (ILD) cue is available, it was not clear if listeners were using that or the monaural level cue that necessarily accompanies ILD. In this experiment, 13 sighted and normal-hearing listeners were asked to identify the right-vs.-left position of an object in virtual auditory space. Sounds were manipulated to remove binaural cues (binaural vs. diotic presentation) and prevent the use of monaural level cues (using level roving). With low- (<2 kHz) and high- (>2 kHz) frequency bands of noise, performance with binaural presentation and level rove exceeded that expected from use of monaural level cues and that with diotic presentation. It is argued that a high-frequency binaural cue (most likely ILD), and not a monaural level cue, is crucial for robust object localisation without head movement.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25660196     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Blindness enhances auditory obstacle circumvention: Assessing echolocation, sensory substitution, and visual-based navigation.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Human echolocators adjust loudness and number of clicks for detection of reflectors at various azimuth angles.

Authors:  L Thaler; R De Vos; D Kish; M Antoniou; C Baker; M Hornikx
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Human Echolocation for Target Detection Is More Accurate With Emissions Containing Higher Spectral Frequencies, and This Is Explained by Echo Intensity.

Authors:  L J Norman; L Thaler
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-05-22

4.  Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression.

Authors:  D H Baker; G Vilidaite; E McClarnon; E Valkova; A Bruno; R E Millman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparing Echo-Detection and Echo-Localization in Sighted Individuals.

Authors:  Carlos Tirado; Billy Gerdfeldter; Stina C Kärnekull; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  People's Ability to Detect Objects Using Click-Based Echolocation: A Direct Comparison between Mouth-Clicks and Clicks Made by a Loudspeaker.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Josefina Castillo-Serrano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mouth-clicks used by blind expert human echolocators - signal description and model based signal synthesis.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Galen M Reich; Xinyu Zhang; Dinghe Wang; Graeme E Smith; Zeng Tao; Raja Syamsul Azmir Bin Raja Abdullah; Mikhail Cherniakov; Christopher J Baker; Daniel Kish; Michail Antoniou
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.