Literature DB >> 25659500

Expression pattern and function of Notch2 in different subtypes of first trimester cytotrophoblast.

K Plessl1, S Haider1, C Fiala2, J Pollheimer1, M Knöfler3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Notch signalling has been shown to control cytotrophoblast (CTB) proliferation, differentiation and motility suggesting that the conserved signalling pathway could be critical for human placental development. Since individual Notch receptors have not been elucidated, we herein investigated expression pattern and function of Notch2 in different first trimester trophoblast subpopulations.
METHODS: Localisation of Notch2 was analysed in first trimester placental and decidual tissues using immunofluorescence. Notch2 transcript and protein levels were studied by qRT-PCR and Western blotting in proliferative EGF receptor (EGFR)(+) and differentiated HLA-G(+) CTBs, respectively, isolated from early placentae by MACS. CTB migration through fibronectin-coated transwells as well as proliferation (EdU labelling) in floating villous explant cultures and primary CTBs were investigated in the presence of Notch2 siRNAs or specific antibodies blocking Notch2 cleavage.
RESULTS: In tissue sections Notch2 expression was higher in HLA-G(+) distal cell column trophoblasts (dCCTs) compared to proximal CCTs. Accordingly, expression of Notch2 mRNA and protein were elevated in isolated HLA-G(+) CTBs compared to EGFR(+) CTBs. Notch2 was also detectable in interstitial CTBs as well as in intramural CTBs associated with maternal decidual vessels. Antibody-mediated inhibition of Notch2 signalling did not affect proliferation, but increased migration of SGHPL-5 cells and primary CTBs. Similarly, Notch2 siRNA treatment promoted trophoblast motility. DISCUSSION: Notch2 is present in differentiated cells of the extravillous trophoblast lineage, such as dCCTs, interstitial and intramural CTBs, suggesting diverse roles of the particular receptor. Notch2 signalling, activated by cell-cell contact of neighbouring dCCTs, could attenuate trophoblast migration.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extravillous trophoblast; Human placenta; Migration; Notch2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25659500      PMCID: PMC4368107          DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Placenta        ISSN: 0143-4004            Impact factor:   3.481


Introduction

Human placentation involves the generation of diverse trophoblast subtypes which are essential for subsequent embryonic development. Whereas the villous syncytium produces hormones to maintain pregnancy, anchoring villi attaching to the maternal uterus give rise to extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs) invading decidual stroma and vessels. Interstitial cytotrophoblasts (iCTBs) approach the wall of maternal spiral arteries and promote vessel remodelling in conjunction with uterine NK (uNK) cells and endovascular cytotrophoblasts (eCTBs), the latter replacing maternal endothelial cells [1,2]. These processes are required for continuous, low pressure blood flow to the placenta, thereby ensuring adequate nutrition of the fetus and preventing oxidative stress [3]. Abnormal changes in myometrial vessel remodelling have been detected in pregnancy diseases such as preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction [4,5]; their causes however remain largely elusive. Failures in trophoblast proliferation and EVT differentiation could be involved since CTBs, isolated from preeclamptic patients, lack critical lineage marker genes and show changes in gene expression pattern when differentiating in vitro [6,7]. However, our knowledge about the differentiation program of the anchoring villus is only scarce. Whereas many different studies investigated soluble factors regulating trophoblast migration [8,9], numerous key questions concerning placental development, such as mechanisms controlling cell column proliferation and differentiation of progenitors into distinct EVT subtypes, have not been unravelled. The conserved Notch signalling pathway has been shown to control stem cell renewal, cell fate decisions and differentiation [10,11]. Upon cell–cell contact, membrane-anchored ligands, the Serrate-like ligands (Jagged1 and 2) and the Delta-like ligands (DLL1, 3 and 4), bind to the different Notch receptors (Notch1–4) and thereby provoke activation of the pathway. Subsequent downstream signalling involves two proteolytic cleavage steps executed by members of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) family and γ-secretase finally generating the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) which translocates to the nucleus. Upon binding NICD converts the transcription factor recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region (RBPJκ) into a transcriptional activator. After recruitment of additional co-activators of the Mastermind-like (MAML) family the NICD-RBPJκ complex induces target genes involved in proliferation, cell lineage determination and differentiation [12]. Recent evidence suggests that the Notch signalling pathway could also be critically involved in placental development and function. Mice harbouring homozygous deletions of different Notch signalling components displayed defects in chorioallantoic branching, labyrinth formation/function or chorion-allantoic fusion [13]. Moreover, Notch2 mutant mice die around E11.5 due to reduced blood delivery to the placenta and lower numbers of blood sinuses within the labyrinth [14]. Conditional deletion of Notch2 in progenitors of the invasive trophoblast lineage reduced endovascular invasion, diameter of trophoblast-lined vascular canals and placental perfusion [15]. Hence, functional data as well as the expression pattern of Notch2 and its putative ligands in different trophoblast subtypes [16] suggest a vital role of the receptor in murine placentation. Similar to mice, Notch signalling could also regulate human trophoblast function and/or differentiation. Indeed, Notch receptors and ligands were detected in the diverse CTB populations of first and second trimester placenta and changes in gene expression between normal and preeclamptic placental tissues were noticed [15,17-19]. Chemical inhibition of γ-secretase and siRNA-mediated gene silencing of RBPJκ increased proliferation of villous CTBs (vCTBs) and cell column trophoblasts (CCTs) in first trimester villous explant cultures as well as EVT marker expression in primary CTBs suggesting that canonical Notch signalling could control the differentiation program of anchoring villi [18,20]. The role of individual Notch receptors, however, has not been elucidated in human trophoblasts. To gain more insights into specific functions of Notch we herein analysed the expression pattern of Notch2 in different trophoblast subtypes and studied its role in trophoblast proliferation and EVT migration.

Materials and methods

Tissue collection

First trimester placental (n = 50) and decidual (n = 5) specimens were gained from elective terminations. Tissues were collected with written informed consent and utilization was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna.

Cultivation of primary human first trimester CTBs and SGHPL-5 cells

Primary human CTBs were isolated from first trimester placentae according to a modified protocol of Tarrade et al. [21], as previously published [18,20,22]. Purified trophoblasts were seeded onto fibronectin-coated (20 μg/ml; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) wells at a density of 5 × 105 cells/24-well. To isolate CTB subtypes, magnetic bead sorting (MACS) was used to separate proliferative, EGFR+ CTBs from differentiated, HLA-G+ CTBs. EGFR-PE antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) or HLA-G-PE antibody (Exbio, Praha, Czech Republic) and anti-PE micro-beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) were utilised. SGHPL-5 cells were cultivated in DMEM/Ham's F12, supplemented with 10% FCS and 0.05 mg/ml gentamicin as published [23].

Immunofluorescence analysis

First trimester placental/decidual tissues and floating placental explants were fixed in 7.5% formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Serial sections of these samples were deparaffinised and antigens retrieved in PT Module Buffer 1 (100× citrate buffer, pH 6; Thermo Fisher Scientific) by KOS MicrowaveStation (Milestone Srl, Sorisole, Italy). Sections were incubated with primary antibodies against Cytokeratin-7 (OV-TL 12/13, DAKO, 1:100), Cytokeratin wide spectrum (GeneTex, GTX29377, 1:100), DLL1 (ab76655, Abcam, 1:100), DLL4 (PAB10200, Abnova, 1:100), HLA-G (MEM-G/9, Exbio, 1:100), Jagged1 (H-114, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:100), Jagged2 (C23D2, Cell Signaling, 1:100), Notch2 (D76A6, Cell Signaling, 1:100), HAI-1 (H180, Santa Cruz, 1:100) or VE-Cadherin (BV9, Abcam, 1:100) at 4 °C overnight. Normal Rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling, 1:100) and Rabbit mAb IgG (DA1E, Cell Signaling, 1:250) were used as negative controls (not shown). Subsequently, sections were incubated with goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 568 (2 μg/ml; Molecular Probes, Life Technologies) for 1 h at room temperature. All sections were counterstained with DAPI (1 mg/ml; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Images were acquired on a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX50, CC12 digital camera, CellˆP software, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany).

Quantitative RT-PCR

RNA was isolated using peqGOLD TriFast™ (PEQLAB, Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). Amount and purity were measured with NanoDrop spectrophotometer (ND-1000, PEQLAB). cDNA synthesis, qRT-PCR and data analysis were performed as previously described [24], using 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The FAM™ dye-labelled TaqMan® MGB probes (Applied Biosystems) utilised were EGFR (Hs00193306_m1), HLA-G (Hs00365950_g1), ITGA1 (Hs00235006_m1), ITGA5 (Hs01547673_m1) Notch2 (Hs01050702_m1) and HES1 (Hs00172878_m1). The housekeeping gene TATA-binding protein (TBP; 4333769F) was used as endogenous control.

Western blot analysis

Protein lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto methanol-activated PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, U.K.) and incubated with primary antibodies against EGFR (D38B1, Cell Signaling, 1:1000), GAPDH (14C10, Cell Signaling, 1:1000), HLA-G (MEM-G/9, Exbio, 1:500), Notch2 (D76A6, Cell Signaling, 1:1000) and TCF-4 (C9B9, Cell Signaling, 1:1000) at 4 °C overnight. Finally, the blots were incubated with HRP-linked anti-mouse (1:25,000; GE-Healthcare) or anti-rabbit (1:5.000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) IgG secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature and developed with ECL Prime Western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare). The proteins were visualised with MultiImage III FC Light Cabinet and Alpha View 3.1.1.0 software (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA).

siRNA-mediated gene silencing and inhibition of Notch2

For siRNA-mediated silencing primary CTBs were transfected with non-targeting control siRNAs (D-001810-01-05) or Notch2 siRNAs (L-012235-00; ON-TARGETplus SMARTpools, Dharmacon-Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, CA) using the 4D-Nucleofector (program EO-100) and Amaxa SG Cell Line 4D Nucleofector X Kit L (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). SGHPL-5 cells were transfected by using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX transfection reagent (Life Technologies). For specific inhibition of Notch2 signalling, cultivated cells were treated with 0.4 μg/ml Notch2 blocking antibody or 0.4 μg/ml human IgG isotype control (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO). The blocking antibody binds and stabilises the negative regulatory region of the receptor, thereby inhibiting conformational changes, ADAM mediated-cleavage and Notch2-ICD (N2ICD)-dependent activation of canonical signalling [25] as also recently published [26].

Migration assay

24 h after siRNA transfection or treatment with Notch2 blocking antibody cells were seeded onto fibronectin-coated transwells (Merck Millipore, 12 μm pore size for trophoblasts, 8 μm for SGHPL-5 cells). After additional 24 h inserts were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and nuclei of migrated cells were stained with DAPI and visualised by fluorescence microscopy. Five non-overlapping pictures per membrane were taken at a 40-fold magnification and digitally analysed with ImageJ software as published [20].

Proliferation assay

Proliferation in placental villous explant cultures and isolated CTBs was analysed by EdU-Click 488 (baseclick GmbH, Tutzing, Germany). Primary cells and floating explants, dissected from first trimester placenta, were cultivated overnight in DMEM/Ham's F12 in the presence of 10 μM EdU and 0.4 μg/ml Notch2 blocking antibody or 0.4 μg/ml IgG isotype control and subsequently processed for immunofluorescence analysis as mentioned [18,20].

Luciferase assay

Primary CTBs and SGHPL-5 cells were transfected with 1 μg/ml of a luciferase reporter plasmid containing four RBPJκ binding sites and 0.5 μg/ml pCMV-β-galactosidase (CMV-βGal, normalisation control) as previously mentioned [20]. Transfected cells were cultivated overnight with the Notch2 blocking antibody. Subsequently, cells were lysed in cell culture lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (1:100; Invitrogen-Life Technologies). β-galactosidase and luciferase activities were measured as previously published [18,27].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test or Welch's test using SPSS version 17 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Gaussian distribution and equality of variances were determined with Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Levene's test, respectively.

Results

Notch2 predominantly localizes to differentiated HLA-G+ CTBs

Immunofluorescence of first trimester placental tissues revealed expression of Notch2 in the villous core, in vCTBs as well as in CCTs (Fig. 1). Notch2 increased in distal areas of the cell column and was also abundantly expressed in migratory HLA-G+ interstitial CTBs (iCTBs) of decidua basalis as well as in intramural cytotrophoblasts (imCTBs) surrounding maternal blood vessels (Fig. 1). Several of the imCTBs exhibited nuclear Notch2 staining. Closer inspection of arterial vessels harbouring cytokertatin 7+ imCTBs revealed that the adjacent maternal endothelial cell (EC) layer expressed the Notch ligands DLL1, DLL4, JAG1 and JAG2 (Supplementary Fig. 1). DLL1 and JAG2 were also strongly expressed in iCTBs and imCTBs, whereas these CTB subtypes weakly produced DLL4 and JAG1 (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Expression of Notch2 in first trimester placental and decidual tissues. Cytokeratin 7 (KRT7) and HLA-G were used to mark all CTB subtypes and EVTs. Nuclei are stained with DAPI. Representative examples showing localisation of Notch2 in cell column trophoblasts (first panel; dCCT, distal cell column trophoblast; pCCT, proximal cell column trophoblast; 12th week placenta, scale bars represent 100 μm), in interstitial cytotrophoblasts (iCTBs) of the decidua basalis (second panel; 12th week, scale bars represent 50 μm), and in intramural cytotrophoblasts (imCTB), associated with maternal blood vessels (fourth panel; 12th week decidua basalis, digitally zoomed). In all placentae analysed (n = 4, between 6th and 12th week of gestation) expression was weaker in pCCTs and villous cytotrophoblasts (vCTB) compared to non-proliferative, HLA-G+ dCCTs. Inserts (i) depict digital magnifications, showing HLA-G and Notch2 in dCCTs. Notch2 was also present in the villous core (VC) as well as in decidual stromal cells (DSC), some of which showed nuclear staining as published [26]. VE-cadherin (CDH5) stained endothelial cells (EC) in spiral arteries (SA) present in maternal decidua (third panel; 12th week decidua basalis, scale bars represent 100 μm). Partial disruption of the maternal EC layer/VE-cadherin staining depicted in (ii) suggested on-going vessel remodelling. imCTBs in (ii) and (iii) showed nuclear Notch2 staining. Selected areas (ii) and (iii) on the right-hand side represent magnified overlays of KRT7+/Notch2+ imCTBs with nuclear N2ICD.

Notch2 expression is associated with EVT differentiation

Notch2 was measured by qRT-PCR and Western blotting in EGFR+ CTBs and HLA-G+ EVTs isolated from first trimester placentae using MACS (Fig. 2). Both Notch2 mRNA (Fig. 2A) and protein (Fig. 2B) were elevated in the HLA-G+ cell pool confirming immunofluorescence data.
Fig. 2

Expression of Notch2 and EVT markers in EGFR+ and HLA-G+ CTBs isolated from first trimester placental tissue. (A) Transcript levels of Notch2, EGFR, HLA-G, integrin α1 (ITGA1) and integrin α5 (ITGA5) in the two different CTB populations using qRT-PCR. Mean values ± S.D. obtained from five different CTB isolations are shown. For relative quantification (AU, arbitrary units) values of each target gene were arbitrarily set to 1 in EGFR+ CTBs. *p < 0.05. Consistent with EVT differentiation HLA-G, ITGA1 and ITGA5 mRNAs were elevated in HLA-G+ CTBs compared to EGFR+ CTBs, the latter expressing high levels of EGFR. (B) Protein levels of Notch2, EGFR, HLA-G and TCF-4 in the two purified CTB cell types analysed by Western blotting. In agreement with the mRNA expression data HLA-G+ CTBs expressed increased levels of Notch2, HLA-G and TCF-4. The latter has been recently established as a marker of EVT [27,29]. GAPDH was used as loading control.

Notch2 impairs trophoblast migration

To assess the role of Notch2 in trophoblast migration (Fig. 3) SGHPL-5 cells and primary first trimester CTBs were treated with Notch2 siRNAs or specific blocking antibodies preventing Notch2 cleavage and therefore N2ICD-dependent transcription. Transfection with Notch2 siRNA decreased Notch2 protein levels in cellular extracts of SGHPL-5 cells and primary CTBs (Supplementary Fig. 2). Efficacy of the Notch2 blocking antibody was confirmed by downregulation of canonical Notch reporter activity in the two cell types (Supplementary Fig. 3). Both siRNA-mediated gene silencing (Fig. 3A) and inhibition of Notch2 cleavage (Fig. 3B) increased migration of primary CTBs and SGHPL-5 cells through fibronectin-coated transwells.
Fig. 3

siRNA-mediated Notch2 knockdown or antibody-mediated inhibition of Notch2-dependent signalling increase motility of primary CTBs and SGHPL-5 cells through fibronectin-coated transwells. (A) Migration in the presence of Notch2 siRNA (siN2) or non-targeting control (ntc). Bars represent mean values ± S.D. obtained from each three CTB isolations/SGHPL-5 cell experiments performed in duplicates. ntc was arbitrarily set to 100%. *p < 0.05. (B) Migration upon addition of Notch2 blocking antibody (N2AB) or IgG control (IgG ctrl). Bars represent mean values ± S.D. obtained from three experiments performed in duplicates. IgG control was arbitrarily set to 100%. *p < 0.05.

Notch2 inhibition does not affect proliferation

Advantageous over siRNA treatment, treatment with the blocking antibody allows for immediate inhibition of Notch2-dependent signalling. Hence, proliferation in floating villous explant cultures was assessed in the presence of the inhibitory Notch2 antibody by using immunoflourescent EdU labelling (Fig. 4A). However, evaluation of the percentage of EdU+ vCTBs and CCTs cells did not reveal any differences between cultures treated with the blocking antibody or IgG control (Fig. 4B) although efficient downregulation of the canonical Notch target gene HES1 was observed (Supplementary Fig. 4). Accordingly, inhibition of Notch2 cleavage did neither affect EdU incorporation into isolated primary CTBs (Fig. 4C), nor outgrowth in villous explant cultures seeded on collagen I (data not shown).
Fig. 4

Antibody-mediated inhibition of Notch2-dependent signalling in first trimester floating villous explant cultures and primary CTBs. Proliferation was analysed by EdU incorporation and counting of the EdU/DAPI ratio. (A) Representative pictures (scale bars represent 50 μm) showing immunofluorescent EdU staining in floating explant cultures treated with Notch2 blocking antibody (N2AB) or IgG control (IgG ctrl). Upper and lower panel show EdU labelling in HAI1+ vCTBs and KRT7+ CCTs. Nuclei are stained with DAPI. EdU+ vCTBs and CCTs are indicated by arrows. CCT, cell column trophoblast; VC, villous core; vCTB, villous cytotrophoblasts. (B) Percentage of EdU+ villous CTBs and CCTs. Each 14 explants isolated from three different placentae were evaluated in the presence of N2AB or IgG ctrl. Bar graphs represent mean values ± S.D. of 1200–1400 nuclei of vCTBs and 2400–2600 nuclei of CCTs per condition. (C) Percentage of EdU+ primary CTBs after treatment with N2AB or IgG ctrl. Bar graphs represent mean values ± S.D. of three experiments performed in duplicates. n.s., not significant.

Discussion

Descriptive studies suggest complex roles for Notch2 in the developing mouse placenta. Notch2 expression varies dynamically throughout mouse gestation and complementary expression of the receptor and its potential interacting ligands have been detected in neighbouring trophoblasts of the ectoplacental cone and labyrinth [16]. Moreover, Notch2 is the predominant receptor in differentiated, invasive trophoblast cell types such as interstitial glycogen trophoblasts and trophoblast giant cells lining spiral arteries and arterial canals [14-16]. Similar to mice, the present study shows that Notch2 expression is mainly associated with differentiated HLA-G+ CTB subtypes. Both immunofluorescence in first trimester placental tissues and analyses of primary CTB pools isolated by MACS suggested that Notch2 expression increased during EVT differentiation, the latter being characterised by the induction of marker genes such as HLA-G, ITGA1 and ITGA5. Besides elevated expression in HLA-G+ dCCTs, Notch2 was also abundant in iCTBs and imCTBs of first trimester decidua basalis. These data are in agreement with previous analyses of second trimester basal plate biopsies showing expression of Notch2 in the different invasive trophoblast cell types [15]. Furthermore, immunofluorescence with the Notch2 antibody, recognizing a membrane-bound, intermediate cleavage product as well as nuclear Notch2, indicated that N2ICD was partly present in imCTB nuclei. The maternal EC layer adjacent to imCTBs expressed JAG1, JAG2, DLL1 and DLL4. Therefore, we speculate that putative binding of maternally-expressed ligands to the Notch2 receptor present on imCTBs could activate canonical, N2ICD-dependent signalling and thereby eventually contribute to remodelling of maternal arterial vessel. In agreement with this assumption, Notch2 was shown to play a crucial role in murine trophoblast invasion and placental perfusion. Conditional deletion of Notch2 in progenitors of the invasive trophoblast lineage decreased endovascular invasion of spiral arteries and the diameter of maternal canals which deliver blood to the developing placenta [15]. Besides its role in endovascular invasion and remodelling, Notch2 and its interacting ligands could have diverse roles at the placental–decidual interface, likely depending on their respective expression by adjacent interacting cell types. For example, decidual stromal cells, which were shown to control endogenous prolactin and IGFBP-1 expression via Notch2 activation, express DLL1 and DLL4 in a differentiation-dependent manner [26]. The latter ligand impaired in vitro migration of purified CTBs [18]. Moreover, CD45+ leukocytes of the decidua produce DLL1, DLL4 and JAG1 [26]. Hence, tissue invasion of iCTBs expressing Notch2 could be controlled by ligands present on interacting decidual stromal cells, macrophages or uterine NK cells. On the other hand, we speculate that ligands expressed by iCTBs could possibly activate Notch2 in stromal cells and thereby control decidual marker gene expression. In this context it is also noteworthy that both DLL1 and DLL4 were shown to activate Notch signalling in decidual NK cells promoting interferon-γ secretion [28]. Moreover, Notch2 could also play a role in the distal cell column where HLA-G+ trophoblasts exhibit cell–cell contact before they undergo further differentiation steps along the invasive pathway. Indeed, inhibition of Notch2 cleavage with a specific blocking antibody as well as siRNA-mediated Notch2 silencing increased migration of SGHPL-5 cells and primary CTBs. These data are in agreement with our recent observation showing that chemical inhibition of γ-secretase, blocking canonical NICD-dependent signalling, also increased EVT motility [18]. Therefore, we speculate that activation of Notch2 by neighbouring HLA-G+ CCTs could positively affect cell column integrity and thereby impair trophoblast detachment and migration. Since HLA-G+ CCTs express DLL1, DLL4, JAG1 and JAG2 [18], different Notch2-ligand interactions could be involved. Concurrent with the weak expression of Notch2 in EGFR+ CTBs, blocking of N2ICD-dependent signalling did not affect proliferation of CCTs in villous explants cultures and isolated primary cells. In contrast, inhibition of γ-secretase and silencing of RBPJκ were shown to increase cell column proliferation and trophoblast outgrowth in these organ cultures [18,20]. The latter treatments also elevated HLA-G, ITGA1, ITGA5 and TCF-4 expression in differentiating CTBs [18,20], whereas these EVT markers were not affected upon antibody-mediated inhibition of Notch2 cleavage (data not shown). Therefore, we assume that the main role of Notch2 is to regulate features of HLA-G+ CCTs and different EVT subtypes, whereas other receptors of the proximal cell column, such as Notch1, 3 or 4 [15,18], could control balanced rates of trophoblast proliferation and EVT differentiation. In analogy to that, murine Notch2 was shown to promote endovascular trophoblast invasion but not trophoblast lineage development [14,15]. Depending on the interacting cell type and the expression pattern of ligands Notch2 could regulate column integrity, trophoblast migration, decidual cell function and vessel remodelling.

Author's contributions

K.P. is a PhD student working on Notch2 signalling in placentation. She performed the majority of the experiments and provided the graphical illustrations. S.H. performed RBPJκ luciferase assays. C.F. provided the placental material and was responsible for clinical management and information of patients. J.P. contributed to study design and writing. M.K. is the principal investigator of the study and wrote the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors do not report any conflict of interest.

Disclosure statement

The authors have nothing to declare.
  29 in total

1.  Characterization of human villous and extravillous trophoblasts isolated from first trimester placenta.

Authors:  A Tarrade; R Lai Kuen; A Malassiné; V Tricottet; P Blain; M Vidaud; D Evain-Brion
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 2.  The uterine spiral arteries in human pregnancy: facts and controversies.

Authors:  R Pijnenborg; L Vercruysse; M Hanssens
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Activation of the canonical wingless/T-cell factor signaling pathway promotes invasive differentiation of human trophoblast.

Authors:  Jürgen Pollheimer; Thomas Loregger; Stefan Sonderegger; Leila Saleh; Sandra Bauer; Martin Bilban; Klaus Czerwenka; Peter Husslein; Martin Knöfler
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Human cytotrophoblast differentiation/invasion is abnormal in pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  K H Lim; Y Zhou; M Janatpour; M McMaster; K Bass; S H Chun; S J Fisher
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Notch2 is required for formation of the placental circulatory system, but not for cell-type specification in the developing mouse placenta.

Authors:  Yoshio Hamada; Takeshi Hiroe; Yuko Suzuki; Mayumi Oda; Yoshihide Tsujimoto; John R Coleman; Satoshi Tanaka
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.880

6.  Distribution of Notch protein members in normal and preeclampsia-complicated placentas.

Authors:  Luigi Cobellis; Annunziata Mastrogiacomo; Elisabetta Federico; Maria Teresa Schettino; Maria De Falco; Lucrezia Manente; Gabriele Coppola; Marco Torella; Nicola Colacurci; Antonio De Luca
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Placental bed spiral arteries in the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Authors:  R Pijnenborg; J Anthony; D A Davey; A Rees; A Tiltman; L Vercruysse; A van Assche
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-07

Review 8.  The notch signalling pathway in the development of the mouse placenta.

Authors:  M Gasperowicz; F Otto
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Spatiotemporal expression of Notch receptors and ligands in developing mouse placenta.

Authors:  Malgorzata Gasperowicz; Anshita Rai; James C Cross
Journal:  Gene Expr Patterns       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 1.224

Review 10.  Mastermind-like transcriptional co-activators: emerging roles in regulating cross talk among multiple signaling pathways.

Authors:  A S McElhinny; J-L Li; L Wu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  9 in total

1.  Notch1 controls development of the extravillous trophoblast lineage in the human placenta.

Authors:  Sandra Haider; Gudrun Meinhardt; Leila Saleh; Christian Fiala; Jürgen Pollheimer; Martin Knöfler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hypoxia Directs Human Extravillous Trophoblast Differentiation in a Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Anna K Wakeland; Francesca Soncin; Matteo Moretto-Zita; Ching-Wen Chang; Mariko Horii; Don Pizzo; Katharine K Nelson; Louise C Laurent; Mana M Parast
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Transforming growth factor-β signaling governs the differentiation program of extravillous trophoblasts in the developing human placenta.

Authors:  Sandra Haider; Andreas Ian Lackner; Bianca Dietrich; Victoria Kunihs; Peter Haslinger; Gudrun Meinhardt; Theresa Maxian; Leila Saleh; Christian Fiala; Jürgen Pollheimer; Paulina A Latos; Martin Knöfler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 4.  WNT and NOTCH signaling in human trophoblast development and differentiation.

Authors:  Bianca Dietrich; Sandra Haider; Gudrun Meinhardt; Jürgen Pollheimer; Martin Knöfler
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 9.207

5.  Implications for preeclampsia: hypoxia-induced Notch promotes trophoblast migration.

Authors:  Barry E Perlman; Audrey A Merriam; Alexander Lemenze; Qingshi Zhao; Salma Begum; Mohan Nair; Tracy Wu; Ronald J Wapner; Jan K Kitajewski; Carrie J Shawber; Nataki C Douglas
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  In Vitro Model of Human Trophoblast in Early Placentation.

Authors:  Darina Bačenková; Marianna Trebuňová; Daša Čížková; Radovan Hudák; Erik Dosedla; Alena Findrik-Balogová; Jozef Živčák
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-15

7.  Effects of Notch2 and Notch3 on Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis of Trophoblast Cell Lines.

Authors:  Wei-Xiu Zhao; Xu Zhuang; Tao-Tao Huang; Ran Feng; Jian-Hua Lin
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Self-Renewing Trophoblast Organoids Recapitulate the Developmental Program of the Early Human Placenta.

Authors:  Sandra Haider; Gudrun Meinhardt; Leila Saleh; Viktoria Kunihs; Magdalena Gamperl; Ulrich Kaindl; Adolf Ellinger; Thomas R Burkard; Christian Fiala; Jürgen Pollheimer; Sasha Mendjan; Paulina A Latos; Martin Knöfler
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 7.765

Review 9.  Regulation of Placental Extravillous Trophoblasts by the Maternal Uterine Environment.

Authors:  Jürgen Pollheimer; Sigrid Vondra; Jennet Baltayeva; Alexander Guillermo Beristain; Martin Knöfler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.