Literature DB >> 25659449

Estimating the effects of a calorie-based sugar-sweetened beverage tax on weight and obesity in New York City adults using dynamic loss models.

Ryan Richard Ruff1, Chen Zhen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) contribute to weight gain and increase the risk of obesity. In this article, we determine the effects of an innovative SSB tax on weight and obesity in New York City adults.
METHODS: Dynamic weight loss models were used to estimate the effects of an expected 5800-calorie reduction resulting from an SSB tax on weight and obesity. Baseline data were derived from the New York City Community Health Survey. One, five, and 10-year simulations of weight loss were performed.
RESULTS: Calorie reductions resulted in a per-person weight loss of 0.46 kg in year 1 and 0.92 kg in year 10. A total of 5,531,059 kg was expected to be lost over 10 years when weighted to the full New York City adult population. Approximately 50% of overall bodyweight loss occurred within the first year, and 95% within 5 years. Results showed consistent but nonsignificant decreases in obesity prevalence.
CONCLUSIONS: SSB taxes may be viable strategies to reduce obesity when combined with other interventions to maximize effects in the population.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic weight loss modeling; Obesity; Sugar-sweetened beverage; Taxes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25659449     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  7 in total

Review 1.  The development of scientific evidence for health policies for obesity: why and how?

Authors:  M B Richardson; M S Williams; K R Fontaine; D B Allison
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 2.  Modelling health and economic impact of nutrition interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mariska Dötsch-Klerk; Maaike J Bruins; Patrick Detzel; Janne Martikainen; Reyhan Nergiz-Unal; Annet J C Roodenburg; Ayla Gulden Pekcan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.884

3.  Sustained Impact of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Prices and Sales Over 2 Years.

Authors:  Joshua Petimar; Laura A Gibson; Jiali Yan; Sara N Bleich; Nandita Mitra; Marsha L Trego; Hannah G Lawman; Christina A Roberto
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.604

Review 4.  Prevention of stroke: a strategic global imperative.

Authors:  Valery L Feigin; Bo Norrving; Mary G George; Jennifer L Foltz; Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Comparing the Nutritional Impact of Dietary Strategies to Reduce Discretionary Choice Intake in the Australian Adult Population: A Simulation Modelling Study.

Authors:  Jessica A Grieger; Brittany J Johnson; Thomas P Wycherley; Rebecca K Golley
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  Associations between Governmental Policies to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Supermarket Purchases and Individual, Retailer, and Community Health Outcomes: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Alyssa J Moran; Yuxuan Gu; Sasha Clynes; Attia Goheer; Christina A Roberto; Anne Palmer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review.

Authors:  Natalie Riva Smith; Anna H Grummon; Shu Wen Ng; Sarah Towner Wright; Leah Frerichs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.