Literature DB >> 25659442

Characterisation of in-vivo mechanical action of knee braces regarding their anti-drawer effect.

B Pierrat1, R Oullion2, J Molimard3, L Navarro3, M Combreas4, S Avril3, R Philippot4, P Calmels5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The knee joint is vulnerable to various injuries and degenerative conditions, potentially leading to functional instability. Usual treatments involve knee orthoses to support the joint. However, the level of mechanical action of these devices remains controversial despite high prescription and demand.
METHODS: The mechanical ability of three commercial hinged knee braces and one sleeve to prevent a static drawer was evaluated using a GNRB arthrometer. The testing of both pathological and healthy joints was performed on 16 patients with documented injuries involving the ACL, and an original method allowed decoupling the contribution of the brace.
RESULTS: The mean stiffness of the three hinged braces ranged between 2.0 and 7.1 N/mm. The most efficient brace was able to exert a restraining force on the joint equivalent to the one exerted by a healthy ACL, up to a 2.8 mm anterior displacement of the tibia. For higher anterior displacements, the restraining force of the brace dropped below the level of action of the intact ACL because of the particular non-linear behaviour of this structure. Finally, the most efficient brace was found to vary from subject to subject.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that fabric-based knee braces may effectively replace the passive mechanical role of the ACL within the low stiffness region of this structure. Although bracing may have other benefits (e.g., proprioception), this shows that they act as an effective passive restraint to low grade anterior laxities. Besides, a high patient-specificity of their effects highlighted the need of personalised objective testing for brace selection.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; Arthrometer; Instability; Knee brace; Knee orthosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25659442     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  3 in total

1.  Prospective comparative study of knee laxity with four different methods in anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Jerome Murgier; Jean Sebastien Béranger; Philippe Boisrenoult; Camille Steltzlen; Nicolas Pujol
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, rehabilitation, and return to play: 2015 update.

Authors:  John Nyland; Alma Mattocks; Shane Kibbe; Alaa Kalloub; Joe W Greene; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2016-02-24

3.  Custom-made hinged knee braces with extension support can improve dynamic balance.

Authors:  Akira Ochi; Hiroshi Ohko; Susumu Ota; Nami Shimoichi; Tsukasa Takemoto; Kaho Mitsuke
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.103

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.