| Literature DB >> 25659076 |
Anke Doyon1, Dagmar-Christiane Fischer2, Aysun Karabay Bayazit3, Nur Canpolat4, Ali Duzova5, Betül Sözeri6, Justine Bacchetta7, Ayse Balat8, Anja Büscher9, Cengiz Candan10, Nilgun Cakar11, Osman Donmez12, Jiri Dusek13, Martina Heckel14, Günter Klaus15, Sevgi Mir6, Gül Özcelik16, Lale Sever4, Rukshana Shroff17, Enrico Vidal18, Elke Wühl1, Matthias Gondan19, Anette Melk20, Uwe Querfeld21, Dieter Haffner22, Franz Schaefer1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The extent and relevance of altered bone metabolism for statural growth in children with chronic kidney disease is controversial. We analyzed the impact of renal dysfunction and recombinant growth hormone therapy on a panel of serum markers of bone metabolism in a large pediatric chronic kidney disease cohort.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25659076 PMCID: PMC4319910 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Patient inclusion criteria and subgroups for cross-sectional analysis of bone markers, influence of rhGH treatment and predictors of height and growth.
Subject characteristics.
| All | CKD Stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| N | 556 | 219 | 296 | 41 |
| Age (years) | 12.2 ± 3.3 | 12.3 ± 3.2 | 12.2 ± 3.4 | 12.1 ± 3.1 |
| % male | 66 | 67 | 66 | 59 |
| CKD duration (years) | 6.0 ± 4.6 | 6.1 ± 4.7 | 6.3 ± 4.5 | 4.3 ± 4.1 |
| BMI SDS | 0.08 ± 1.28 | 0.02 ± 1.39 | 0.12 ± 1.24 | 0.15 ± 0.97 |
| Height SDS | -1.38 ± 1.39 | -1.05 ± 1.31 | -1.58 ± 1.39 | -1.64 ± 1.47 |
| ∆ height SDS (per year) | -0.04 ± 0.38 | -0.02 ± 0.38 | -0.03 ± 0.37 | -0.13 ± 0.49 |
| Midparental height (cm) | 170.7 ± 9.4 | 171.3 ± 10.3 | 170.6 ± 9.2 | 168.7 ± 9.97 |
| Physical activity level | ||||
| 0 | 133 (23.9%) | 43 (19.6%) | 71 (24%) | 19 (46.3%) |
| 1 | 111 (20.0%) | 39 (17.8%) | 65 (22%) | 7 (17.1%) |
| 2 | 79 (14.2%) | 37 (16.8%) | 40 (13.5%) | 2 (4.9%) |
| 3 | 231 (41.6%) | 99 (45.2%) | 119 (40.2%) | 13 (31.7%) |
| Serum bicarbonate (mM) | 21.2 ± 3.8 | 21.6 ± 3.5 | 21.0 ± 3.8 | 20.5 ± 4.4 |
| Serum calcium (mM) | 2.21 ± 0.23 | 2.20 ± 0.21 | 2.22 ± 0.23 | 2.22 ± 0.27 |
| Hypocalcemia | 74 (13.3%) | 31 (14.6%) | 38 (12.8%) | 5 (12.2%) |
| Serum phosphate (mM) | 1.54 ± 0.37 | 1.47 ± 0.36 | 1.63 ± 0.35 | 1.67 ± 0.64 |
| Hyperphosphatemia | 183 (32.9%) | 54 (24.7%) | 102 (18.4%) | 27 (65.9%) |
| Serum iPTH (pmol/l) | 12.3 (7.1, 20.2) | 9.2 (5.9, 15.2) | 14.6 (8.7, 23.9) | 17.8 (9.4, 36.3) |
| Serum 25OHD (μg/l) | 11.0 (6.6, 18.1) | 12.4 7.34, 17.6) | 10.7 (6.4, 18.3) | 9.2 (5.5, 20.0) |
| CRP (mg/l) | 0.56 (0.22, 2.06) | 0.55 (0.21, 2.01) | 0.55 (0.3, 2.06) | 0.98 (0.22, 3.16) |
| Albuminuria (mg/g creatinine) | 331 (86, 1343) | 192 (56, 749) | 443 (112, 1669) | 982 (359, 2330) |
| Medications | ||||
| rhGH | 42 (7.6%) | 11 (5.0%) | 26 (8.8%) | 5 (12.2%) |
| Vitamin D supplement | 74 (13.3%) | 21 (9.6%) | 42 (14.2%) | 11 (26.8%) |
| Active vitamin D analogue | 281 (50.5%) | 89 (40.8%) | 165 (55.9%) | 25 (61.0%) |
| Phosphate binders | 254 (45.7%) | 82 (37.6%) | 142 (48.1%) | 29 (70.7%) |
Data are given as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range) or n (%) as appropriate.
At the time of bone marker assessment, 42 children (7.4%) were receiving rhGH treatment, excluding 4 patients who either started or stopped rhGH therapy within 3 months prior to analysis. 38 patients were consistently treated with rhGH during the follow-up period of 6–12 months. rhGH treated patients originated from 7 of the 12 participating countries, had a longer preceding duration of CKD (8.1±4.3 vs 5.9±4.5 years, p<0.003), were taller (-0.89±0.87 vs. -1.4±1.4 SDS, p<0.0002) and showed marginally better current growth rates (0.07±0.38 vs. -0.04±0.38, p = 0.08) compared to all non-rhGH treated patients.
Fig 2Distribution of serum bone marker concentrations in 510 pediatric CKD patients. Data are expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS).
The shaded area depicts the normal range (5th to 95th percentile of biomarker concentrations in healthy children)[8]. Asterisks indicate significant deviation from distribution in the reference population (*: p<0.05, **: p<0.0001 compared to healthy controls).
Distribution of serum bone markers by CKD stage.
| All | p | CKD Stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| BAP (U/L) | 147 ± 84 | 146 ± 74 | 151 ± 92 | 127 ± 73 | |
| BAP SDS | 1.25 ± 2.06 | <0.0001 | 1.27 ± 1.75 | 1.28 ± 2.27 | 0.91 ± 2.14 |
| TRAP5b (U/L) | 13.1 ± 6.6 | 13.3 ± 6.1 | 13.0 ± 7.0 | 12.8 ± 6.6 | |
| TRAP5b SDS | 0.13 ± 1.56 | 0.05 | 0.18 ± 1.35 | 0.10 ± 1.69 | 0.16 ± 1.7 |
| Sclerostin (μg/L) | 0.31 ± 0.12 | 0.30 ± 0.12 | 0.31 ± 0.12 | 0.33 ± 0.16 | |
| Sclerostin SDS | -0.99 ± 1.17 | <0.0001 | -1.05 ± 1.16 | -0.94 ± 1.12 | -1.0 ± 1.6 |
| cCFGF-23 (kRU/L) | 183 (112, 321) | 128 (89, 221) | 226 (136, 355) | 654 (321, 1224) | |
| cCFGF-23 SDS | 3.21 (1.43, 5.46) | <0.0001 | 1.76 (0.67, 3.81) | 3.85 (1.95, 6.12) | 7.85 (4.94, 14.3) |
Data are given as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range) P values indicate difference of age- and sex-adjusted SDS from reference population. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between CKD stages (according to ANOVA using Student-Newman-Keuls grouping).
A, B & C: Student-Newman-Keuls Grouping—Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
Predictors of standardized bone marker concentrations; results of stepwise multiple linear regression analyses.
| BAP SDS | TRAP SDS | Sclerostin SDS | cFGF-23 SDS | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ß ± SE | Part.R2 | p | ß ±SE | Part.R2 | p | ß ±SE | Part.R2 | p | ß ±SE | Part.R2 | p | |
| Intercept | -2 ±0.75 | 0.008 | -5.07 ±0.98 | <0.001 | -0.84 ± 0.45 | 0.06 | -1.23 ± 1.98 | 0.53 | ||||
| Sex (m = 1, f = 2) | -0.35 ±0.18 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.32 ±0.14 | 0.005 | 0.005 | -0.33 ±0.11 | 0.026 | 0.0004 | |||
| Age (y) | 0.06 ±0.03 | 0.007 | 0.05 | 0.15 ±0.02 | 0.089 | <0.0001 | 0.30 ±0.07 | 0.028 | <0.0001 | |||
| Phys Activity (0–3) | -0.17 ±0.07 | 0.01 | 0.02 | -0.11 ±0.05 | 0.006 | 0.05 | ||||||
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) | 0.03 ±0.01 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.02 ±0.008 | 0.005 | 0.08 | -0.21 ±0.02 | 0.13 | <0.0001 | |||
| Plasma iPTH (pM, log) | 0.77 ±0.11 | 0.077 | <0.0001 | 0.44 ±0.09 | 0.038 | <0.0001 | -0.26 ±0.06 | 0.045 | <0.0001 | |||
| Serum Pi (mM) | 1.77 ±0.68 | 0.015 | 0.004 | |||||||||
| Serum calcium (mmol/l) | 0.55 ±0.33 | 0.005 | 0.1 | |||||||||
| Serum 25OHD (µg/l) | 0.23 ±0.12 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.16 ±0.09 | 0.006 | 0.09 | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.017 | 0.003 | |||
| Serum bicarbonate (mM) | 0.03 ±0.01 | 0.006 | 0.08 | 0.22 ±0.06 | 0.025 | 0.0002 | ||||||
| Serum CRP (mg/L, log) | -0.22 ±0.06 | 0.037 | <0.0001 | -0.20 ±0.04 | 0.054 | <0.0001 | ||||||
| Albuminuria (g/g creatinine) | 0.107 ±0.04 | 0.006 | 0.008 | |||||||||
| Glomerulopathy | -0.65 ±0.37 | 0.076 | 0.04 | -0.34 ± 0.23 | 0.004 | 0.13 | ||||||
| Model R2 | 0.173 | 0.22 | 0.106 | 0.2 | ||||||||
Predictors of baseline and prospective change in standardized height in total cohort; results of stepwise multiple linear regression analyses.
| Height SDS | Change in height SDS per year | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ß ± SE | p | ß ± SE | p | |
| Age (y) | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.0004 | 0.009 ± 0.001 | 0.09 |
| Sex (male) | -0.52 ± 0.14 | 0.0002 | ||
| Height SDS | - | -0.03 ± 0.013 | 0.01 | |
| Midparental height (cm) | 0.06 ± 0.008 | <.0001 | ||
| BMI SDS | -0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.037 | ||
| Physical activity level (0–4) | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.001 | ||
| rhGH therapy | 0.15 ± 0.07 | 0.04 | ||
| BAP SDS | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.002 | ||
| TRAP SDS | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.04 | ||
| Sclerostin SDS | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 0.005 | ||
| cFGF-23 SDS | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.001 | ||
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) | 0.03 ± 0.007 | <.0001 | 0.002 ±0.002 | 0.21 |
| Serum bicarbonate (mM) | 0.04 ± 0.015 | 0.01 | ||
| Serum Pi (mM) | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 0.005 | ||
| Serum 25OHD (μg/l, log) | 0.006 ± 0.004 | 0.2 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Serum CRP (mg/L, log) | -0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.07 | ||
| Model R2 | 0.24 | 0.10 | ||
The prospective change in height SDS during one year of observation was positively associated with higher BAP and TRAP5b SDS, lower baseline height SDS and rhGH therapy.
Interestingly, physical activity showed a positive association to prospective growth.
A case-control study was performed to obtain an unbiased analysis of the impact of rhGH on the bone marker pattern. For 41 rhGH treated patients an equal number of untreated control subjects matched by age, sex, country of residence, CKD duration, eGFR and serum phosphorus, iPTH and CRP was identified (see Table 5).
Subject Characteristics for groups matched for GH treatment.
| GH untreated Controls | GH Treated Cases | |
|---|---|---|
| n | 41 | 41 |
| Age (years) | 11.9 ± 3.76 | 12.44 ± 3.24 |
| Sex: male | 35% | 35% |
| CKD duration (years) | 7.79 ± 3.73 | 8.16 ±4.37 |
| Height SDS | -0.78 ± 0.91 | -0.89 ± 0.88 |
| ∆ Height SDS | 0.0 ± 0.39 | 0.06 ± 0.39 |
| BMI SDS | 0.1 ± 1.17 | 0.01 ± 1.27 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) | 24.9 ±8.9 | 24.9 ± 8.95 |
| Albuminuria (mg/g) | 601 ± 899 | 1534 ± 5426 |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 0.57 ± 0.7 | 0.49 ± 0.55 |
| Bicarbonate (mmol/l) | 22.4 ± 3.0 | 21.7 ± 13.0 |
| iPTH (pmol/l) | 11.6 ± 6.4 | 12.0 ± 5.8 |
| Calcium (mmol/l) | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.29 ± 0.26 |
| Phosphate (mmol/l) | 1.60 ± 0.39 | 1.58 ± 0.27 |
| 25OH Vitamin D (μg/l) | 16.9 ± 9.5 | 21.7 ± 13.0 |
| 1,25 OH Vitamin D (ng/l) | 89.6 ± 73.0 | 88.6 ± 78.4 |
| Diagnosis | ||
| Glomerulopathies | 5 (12%) | 2 (5%) |
| CAKUT | 30 (73%) | 29 (71%) |
| Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome | 2 (5%) | 2 (5%) |
| Inflammatory | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) |
| Metabolic | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) |
| Others | 4 (10%) | 6 (15%) |
| Physical Activity Level | ||
| 0 | 14 (34%) | 7 (17%) |
| 1 | 9 (22%) | 13 (32%) |
| 2 | 7 (17%) | 14 (34%) |
| 3 | 11 (27%) | 7 (17%) |
BAP SDS was significantly more increased in rhGH treated patients than in the untreated children (p<0.05) (Fig. 3, Table 6). Conversely, TRAP5b SDS was significantly lower in rhGH treated patients than in untreated controls (p<0.05). Sclerostin SDS in rhGH treated patients was not different from healthy controls but significantly higher than in the matched rhGH untreated patients (p<0.005). cFGF-23 did not differ by rhGH treatment status.
Fig 3Distribution of serum bone marker concentrations in children with and without rhGH treatment (n = 41 per group).
Data are expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS). The shaded area depicts the normal range (5th to 95th percentile of biomarker concentrations in healthy children)8. Asterisks indicate significant deviation from distribution in the reference population (*: p<0.05, **: p<0.01).
Bone markers in groups matched for GH treatment.
| GH untreated group | GH treated group | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | 144 ± 84 | 182 ± 87 | 0.03 |
| BAP SDS | 0.97 ± 1.93 | 1.93 ± 1.96 | 0.02 |
| TRAP5b | 11.9 ± 8.08 | 8.83 ± 4.82 | 0.03 |
| TRAP5b SDS | -0.36 ± 1.96 | -1.25 ± 1.75 | 0.05 |
| Sclerostin | 0.35 ± 0.16 | 0.46 ± 0.19 | 0.01 |
| Sclerostin SDS | -0.63 ± 1.09 | 0.04 ± 0.96 | 0.005 |
| cFGF23 | 407 ± 457 | 380 ± 417 | n.s. |
| cFGF23 SDS | 5.36 ± 4.07 | 4.72 ± 4.17 | n.s. |