| Literature DB >> 25658843 |
Xuan Yu1, Xu Liu2, Zhong Zhao1, Jinliang Liu3, Shunxiang Zhang3.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effect of different afforestation models on soil microbial composition in the Loess Plateau in China. In particular, we determined soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and microbial community structures in the top 0 cm to 10 cm soil underneath a pure Hippophae rhamnoides (SS) stand and three mixed stands, namely, H. rhamnoides and Robinia pseucdoacacia (SC), H. rhamnoides and Pinus tabulaeformis (SY), and H. rhamnoides and Platycladus orientalis (SB). Results showed that total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen, and ammonium (NH4(+)) contents were higher in SY and SB than in SS. The total microbial biomass, bacterial biomass, and Gram+ biomass of the three mixed stands were significantly higher than those of the pure stand. However, no significant difference was found in fungal biomass. Correlation analysis suggested that soil microbial communities are significantly and positively correlated with some chemical parameters of soil, such as TOC, total phosphorus, total potassium, available phosphorus, NH4(+) content, nitrate content (NH3(-)), and the enzyme activities of urease, peroxidase, and phosphatase. Principal component analysis showed that the microbial community structures of SB and SS could clearly be discriminated from each other and from the others, whereas SY and SC were similar. In conclusion, tree species indirectly but significantly affect soil microbial communities and enzyme activities through soil physicochemical properties. In addition, mixing P. tabulaeformis or P. orientalis in H. rhamnoides plantations is a suitable afforestation model in the Loess Plateau, because of significant positive effects on soil nutrient conditions, microbial community, and enzyme activities over pure plantations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25658843 PMCID: PMC4319939 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Soil chemical characteristics in different plantations.
| Site | pH | TOC (g·kg−1) | C/N ratio | TN (g·kg−1) | TP (g·kg−1) | TK (g·kg−1) | NH4 + (g·kg−1) | NO3 - (g·kg−1) | AP (g·kg−1) | AK (g·kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS | 7.72d | 11.93b (1.72) | 10.55b (0.96) | 1.13b (0.10) | 0.38b (0.04) | 12.74b (0.86) | 4.77b (0.39) | 1.03c (0.13) | 9.27b (0.19) | 102.03b (5.00) |
| SY | 8.14b (0.04) | 24.70a (2.88) | 16.32a (3.80) | 1.54a (0.19) | 0.72a (0.14) | 16.76a (0.35) | 8.66a (0.45) | 1.42b (0.16) | 15.27a (0.15) | 139.12a (3.73) |
| SB | 8.27a (0.07) | 22.07a (1.66) | 14.88ab (2.65) | 1.50a (0.16) | 0.73a (0.10) | 16.34a (1.32) | 7.41a (0.61) | 1.92a (0.06) | 15.60a (0.14) | 126.35a (4.27) |
| SC | 7.99c (0.04) | 15.70b (1.55) | 14.13ab (3.21) | 1.14b (0.20) | 0.71a (0.07) | 16.21a (0.80) | 4.91b (0.85) | 1.33b (0.09) | 14.44a (0.06) | 108.71b (6.14) |
a SS: pure Hippophae rhamnoides plantation; SY: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Pinus tabulaeformis; SB: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Platycladus orientalis; SC: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Robinia pseucdoacacia.
b Different letters in the columns indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 levels via the LSD test.
c Standard deviation.
Soil microbial community structure based on indicator lipids (n·mol g−1 soil) from the four sites.
| Site | Total lipid | Bacteria | G+
| G− | Fungi | Ratio G+/G– |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS | 12.15c | 3.93c (0.64) | 2.99b (0.44) | 0.61c (0.15) | 1.56a (0.02) | 5.00a (0.44) |
| SY | 19.57ab (1.25) | 7.63ab (1.35) | 5.97a (1.09) | 1.08ab (0.13) | 1.56a (0.39) | 5.51a (0.44) |
| SB | 23.90a (1.56) | 9.15a (1.32) | 6.50a (0.90) | 1.42a (0.33) | 2.11a (0.39) | 4.91a (0.74) |
| SC | 17.93b (2.28) | 6.78b (1.15) | 5.26a (0.93) | 0.96bc (0.13) | 1.53a (0.17) | 5.45a (0.20) |
Soil microbial community structure based on indicator lipids (nmol g−1 soil) from the four sites
a SS: pure Hippophae rhamnoides plantation; SY: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Pinus tabulaeformis; SB: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Platycladus orientalis; SC: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Robinia pseucdoacacia.
b Total lipid was the sum of the 31 detected fatty acids.
c The values were the means of three replicates. Different letters within columns indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 levels through the LSD test.
d G+ and G− represent gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, respectively. G+/G− was the ratio of the sum of gram-positive bacteria to the sum of gram-negative bacteria.
e Standard deviation.
Fig 1PCA of fatty acids from different plantations models.
SS: pure Hippophae rhamnoides plantation; SY: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Pinus tabulaeformis; SB: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Platycladus orientalis; SC: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Robinia pseucdoacacia.
Soil enzyme activities from different plantations.
| Site | Invertase (mg·g−1·d−1) | Urease (mg·g−1·d−1) | Phosphatase (mg·g−1·d−1) | Polyphenol oxidase (mg·g−1) | Peroxidase (mg·g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS | 2.82c | 0.31c (0.18) | 0.53b (0.06) | 1.73a (0.11) | 0.82b (0.15) |
| SY | 3.77a (0.37) | 0.56a (0.12) | 0.92a (0.25) | 1.24b (0.11) | 1.55a (0.20) |
| SB | 3.52ab (0.25) | 0.52a (0.06) | 0.85a (0.19) | 1.03b (0.26) | 1.44a (0.31) |
| SC | 3.13bc (0.44) | 0.42b (0.04) | 0.54b (0.30) | 1.65a (0.20) | 1.08b (0.05) |
a SS: pure Hippophae rhamnoides plantation; SY: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Pinus tabulaeformis; SB: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Platycladus orientalis; SC: mixed plantation with Hippophae rhamnoides and Robinia pseucdoacacia.
b Different letters within columns indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 levels through the LSD test.
c Standard deviation.
Correlation coefficients between the biomass of the PLFA groups and soil properties.
| TOC | TN | TP | TK | AP | AK | NH4+ | NO3 − | C/N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total lipids | 0.822** | 0.814* | 0.895** | 0.913* | 0.956** | 0.824** | 0.787** | 0.888** | 0.802** |
| Bacteria | 0.868** | 0.403 | 0.608* | 0.664* | 0.738* | 0.491 | 0.416 | 0.746** | 0.283 |
| G+ | 0.765** | 0.640* | 0.726** | 0.859** | 0.859** | 0.662* | 0.626* | 0.795** | 0.596* |
| G− | 0.722** | 0.672* | 0.724** | 0.796** | 0.816** | 0.627* | 0.629* | 0.846* | 0.582* |
| Fungi | 0.129 | 0.212 | 0.039 | 0.264 | 0.171 | 0.132 | 0.202 | 0.209 | 0.073 |
a TOC: total organic carbon; C/N: carbon nitrogen ratio; TN: total nitrogen; TP: total phosphorus; TK: total potassium; NH4 +: ammonium content; NO3 −: nitrate content; AP: available phosphorus; AK: available potassium.
b * and **denote significant differences at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Correlation coefficients between the biomass of the PLFA groups and soil enzyme activities.
| Urease | Invertase | Phosphatase | Polyphenol oxidase | Peroxidase | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total lipids | 0.898** | 0.795* | 0.630* | −0.820** | 0.796** |
| Bacteria | 0.811** | 0.550 | 0.571 | −0.681* | 0.706* |
| G+ | 0.816** | 0.656* | 0.666* | −0.771* | 0.646* |
| G− | 0.837* | 0.518 | 0.472 | −0.741* | 0.669* |
| Fungi | 0.238 | −0.035 | 0.198 | −0.277 | 0.057 |
a * and **denote significant differences at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.