Correction: Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110179.].

Fig. 3 is incorrect. The image for Figure 8 was inadvertently published twice. The authors have provided a corrected version of Fig. 3 here.

Fig 3

Associations of (A) minutia count and value determinations from analysis of the latent (n = 3730); (B) corresponding minutia count and determinations from comparison of latent and exemplar prints on mated data (n = 2796).

In (B), 1.6% of determinations with 12 or more corresponding minutiae marked were not individualized. A few responses in (B) indicate NV with corresponding minutiae due to examiners changing their value determinations during Comparison.

S1 Video is truncated. Please view the correct S1 Video here.

Click here for additional data file.