| Literature DB >> 25658794 |
Huimin Wang1, Mingzi Tan2, Song Zhang3, Xiao Li4, Jian Gao5, Danye Zhang6, Yingying Hao7, Song Gao8, Juanjuan Liu9, Bei Lin10.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of the present study is to investigate the differential expression of CD44, CD47 and c-met in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), the correlation in their expression and their relationship with the biological behavior of OCCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25658794 PMCID: PMC4346902 DOI: 10.3390/ijms16023391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Immunohistochemical micrographs of CD44, CD47 and c-met in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) (200×). (A) CD44; (B) CD47-OCCC; (C) c-met-OCCC.
Expression of CD44, CD47 and c-met in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).
| Groups | Cases | − | + | ++ | +++ | Positive Cases | Positive Rates (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD44 | 86 | 8 | 35 | 26 | 17 | 78 | 90.7 |
| CD47 | 86 | 7 | 27 | 37 | 15 | 79 | 91.9 |
| c-met | 86 | 5 | 21 | 36 | 24 | 81 | 94.2 |
Relationship between CD44, CD47 and c-met levels and clinicopathological features of OCCC.
| Characteristics | Cases | CD44 | CD47 | c-met | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | |||||
| Surgical stage | 86 | - | - | 0.019 | - | - | 0.001 | - | - | 0.144 |
| I/II | 60 | 35 | 25 | - | 30 | 30 | - | 21 | 39 | - |
| III/IV | 26 | 8 | 18 | - | 4 | 22 | - | 5 | 21 | - |
| Lymph node metastasis * | 84 | - | - | 0.275 | - | - | 0.288 | - | - | 1.000 |
| Yes | 10 | 3 | 7 | - | 2 | 8 | - | 3 | 7 | - |
| No | 74 | 40 | 34 | - | 32 | 42 | - | 23 | 51 | - |
| Chemotherapy | 74 | - | - | 0.001 | 0.015 | - | - | 0.010 | ||
| sensitive | 55 | 34 | 21 | - | 26 | 29 | - | 20 | 35 | - |
| resistant | 19 | 3 | 16 | - | 3 | 16 | - | 1 | 18 | - |
* Two cases of ovarian carcinoma patients without lymph node resection.
Multivariate analysis of the prognosis of patients with OCCC.
| Variables | Hazard Radio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| CD44 (low | 0.041 | 3.249 (1.051–10.048) |
| CD47 (low | 0.048 | 4.519 (1.014–20.141) |
| c-met (low | 0.044 | 7.981 (1.047–60.240) |
| Surgical stage (I–II | 0.001 | 5.612 (2.085–15.103) |
Figure 2The association between overall survival, CD44, CD47, c-met expression and surgical stage in 86 patients with OCCC. (A) Patients with Stage I/II disease showed significantly longer overall survival than those with Stage III/IV disease (p = 0.000); (B) patients with low CD44 expression showed significantly longer overall survival than those with high CD44 expression (p = 0.003); (C) patients with low CD47 expression showed significantly longer overall survival than those with high CD47 expression (p = 0.003); and (D) patients with low c-met expression showed significantly longer overall survival than those with high c-met expression (p = 0.007).
The correlation between CD44, CD47 and c-met expression in OCCC.
| CD44 | Cases | CD47 | c-met | CD47 | Cases | c-met | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | ||||
| 8 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 2 | ||
| 78 | 1 | 77 | 0 | 78 | 79 | 0 | 79 | ||
| 86 | 7 | 79 | 5 | 81 | 86 | 5 | 81 | ||
Relationship between CD44/CD47, CD47/c-met and CD47/c-met levels and the clinicopathological features and prognosis of OCCC.
| Groups | Surgical Stage | Lymph Node Metastasis * | Chemotherapy | Prognosis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I/II | III/IV | No | Yes | Sensitive | Resistant | Live (>3 Years) | Dead | ||||||
| CD44-High/ | 17 | 17 | 0.002 * | 28 | 6 | 0.232 ** | 14 | 15 | 0.002 *** | 7 | 15 | 0.000 **** | |
| CD44-High/ | 8 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |||||
| CD44-Low/ | 13 | 5 | 16 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 11 | 2 | |||||
| CD44-Low/ | 22 | 3 | 24 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 19 | 2 | |||||
| CD44-High/ | 23 | 15 | 0.024 # | 33 | 5 | 0.247 ## | 20 | 15 | 0.001 ### | 10 | 15 | 0.000 #### | |
| CD44-High / | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |||||
| CD44-Low/ | 18 | 6 | 21 | 3 | 16 | 3 | 10 | 3 | |||||
| CD44-Low/ | 17 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 17 | 1 | |||||
| CD47-High/ | 20 | 20 | 0.011 & | 39 | 7 | 0.486 && | 24 | 16 | 0.002 &&& | 14 | 16 | 0.000 &&&& | |
| CD47-High/ | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | |||||
| CD47-Low/ | 13 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 2 | |||||
| CD47-Low/ | 17 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 16 | 0 | |||||
| 60 | 26 | - | 74 | 10 | - | 55 | 19 | - | 43 | 19 | - | ||
* Two cases of ovarian carcinoma patients without lymph node resection;*, **, ***, **** cases of CD44-high/CD47-high vs. CD44-low/CD47-low; #, ##, ###, #### cases of CD44-high/c-met-high vs. CD44-low/c-met-low; &, &&, &&&, &&&& cases of CD47-high/c-met-high vs. CD47-low/c-met-low.