Literature DB >> 25658468

Percutaneous "K-wireless" pedicle screw fixation technique: an evaluation of the initial experience of 100 screws with assessment of accuracy, radiation exposure, and procedure time.

Steven M Spitz1, Faheem A Sandhu, Jean-Marc Voyadzis.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Percutaneous pedicle screws are used to provide rigid internal fixation in minimally invasive spinal procedures and generally require the use of Kirchner wires (or K-wires) as a guide for screw insertion. K-wires can bend, break, advance, or pull out during the steps of pedicle preparation and screw insertion. This can lead to increased fluoroscopic and surgical times and potentially cause neurological, vascular, or visceral injury. The authors present their experience with a novel "K-wireless" percutaneous pedicle screw system that eliminates the inherent risks of K-wire use.
METHODS: A total of 100 screws were placed in 28 patients using the K-wireless percutaneous screw system. Postoperative dedicated spinal CT scans were performed in 25 patients to assess the accuracy of screw placement. Screw placement was graded A through D by 2 independent radiologists: A = within pedicle, B = breach < 2 mm, C = breach of 2-4 mm, and D = breach > 4 mm. Screw insertion and fluoroscopy times were also recorded in each case. Clinical complications associated with screw insertion were documented.
RESULTS: A total of 100 K-wireless percutaneous pedicle screws were placed into the lumbosacral spine in 28 patients. Postoperative CT was performed in 25 patients, thus the placement of only 90 screws was assessed. Eighty-seven screws were placed within the pedicle confines (Grade A), and 3 violated the pedicle (2 Grade B [1 lateral, 1 medial] and 1 Grade D [medial]) for an overall accuracy rate of 96.7%. One patient required reoperation for screw repositioning due to a postoperative L-5 radiculopathy secondary to a Grade D medial breach at L-5. This patient experienced improvement of the radiculopathy after reoperation. Average screw insertion and fluoroscopy times were 6.92 minutes and 22.7 seconds per screw, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the placement of K-wireless percutaneous pedicle screws is technically feasible and can be performed accurately and safely with short procedure and fluoroscopy times.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; AP = anteroposterior; K-wire; K-wireless; LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; minimally invasive; percutaneous pedicle screw; technique

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658468     DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE14181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  11 in total

1.  Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography.

Authors:  Jacob T Gibby; Samuel A Swenson; Steve Cvetko; Raj Rao; Ramin Javan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Percutaneous screw placement in the lumbar spine with a modified guidance technique based on 3D CT navigation system.

Authors:  Ioannis D Siasios; John Pollina; Asham Khan; Vassilios George Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

3.  Percutaneous thoraco-lumbar-sacral pedicle screw placement accuracy results from a multi-center, prospective clinical study using a skin marker-based optical navigation system.

Authors:  Scarone Pietro; Anindita Chatterjea; Jenniskens Inge; Klüter Tim; Weuster Matthias; Lippross Sebastian; Presilla Stefano; Daniela Distefano; Chianca Vito; Sedaghat Sam; Melissa Nelson; Lampe Finn; Seekamp Andreas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screw placement using the K-wireless minimally invasive spine percutaneous pedicle screw system in Japan: A randomized active controlled study.

Authors:  Kazuo Ohmori; Sei Terayama; Koichiro Ono; Miyuki Sakamoto; Yukie Horikoshi
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-05-08

5.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for an unstable thoracic spine fracture after a traumatic degloving injury.

Authors:  Emma Christine Celano; Griffin R Baum; Rondi B Gelbard; Faiz U Ahmad
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-08

6.  Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws.

Authors:  Saeed S Sadrameli; Ryan Jafrani; Blake N Staub; Majdi Radaideh; Paul J Holman
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21

7.  Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Using a Power Tool.

Authors:  Atsushi Kojima; Atsushi Fujii; Shigeta Morioka; Yoshiaki Torii; Kenichiro Arai; Yutaka Sasao
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-01-27

8.  The usefulness and safety of the simultaneous parallel anterior and posterior combined lumbar spine surgery using intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (SPAPS).

Authors:  Hisanori Ikuma; Tomohiko Hirose; Shinichiro Takao; Kazutoshi Otsuka; Keisuke Kawasaki
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-12-23

9.  Accuracy of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Technique with Conventional Dual Fluoroscopy Units and a Retrospective Comparative Study Based on Surgeon Experience.

Authors:  Masayuki Nakahara; Takao Yasuhara; Takafumi Inoue; Yuichi Takahashi; Shinji Kumamoto; Yasukazu Hijikata; Akira Kusumegi; Yushi Sakamoto; Koichi Ogawa; Kenki Nishida
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

10.  [Learning curve of minimally invasive pedicle screw placement].

Authors:  Federico Landriel; Santiago Hem; Jorge Rasmussen; Eduardo Vecchi; Claudio Yampolsky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.