Literature DB >> 25658034

A standardized anesthetic and surgical clinical pathway for esophageal resection: impact on length of stay and major outcomes.

Grete H Porteous1, Joseph M Neal, April Slee, Henner Schmidt, Donald E Low.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Esophageal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and esophageal resection is associated with extremely high perioperative morbidity and mortality. A perioperative clinical pathway for esophagectomy patients in which anesthetic care is both integral and standardized has not been described previously.
METHODS: A continuously refined clinical pathway for perioperative care of the esophagectomy patient has been developed at the Virginia Mason Medical Center over the past 22 years. Ongoing data collection records patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor stage, and various outcomes including intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, surgical complications, and morbidity and mortality rates.
RESULTS: Over time, patients presenting for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer have had significantly higher Charlson comorbidity scores and a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, liver disease, and history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. During the same period, intensive care unit and hospital length of stays have decreased, whereas most complication rates have remained stable despite more advanced tumor stage and increased use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates are well below national averages at 0.5% each.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a detailed anesthetic and surgical perioperative pathway for esophageal resection, along with evidence of improved or stable patient outcomes despite an increase in comorbidity burden and increasingly advanced tumor stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658034     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  10 in total

1.  Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Goran Marjanovic; Birte Kulemann; Olivia Sick; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Jens Hoeppner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for head and neck cancer patients: Considerations and best practices.

Authors:  Aman Prasad; Kevin Chorath; Louis-Xavier Barrette; Beatrice Go; Jie Deng; Alvaro Moreira; Karthik Rajasekaran
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-03-06

4.  Perioperative Protocol of Ankle Fracture and Distal Radius Fracture Based on Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program: A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Controlled study.

Authors:  Ting Li; Zhi-Jian Sun; Yan Zhou; Wei-Tong Sun; Peng-Cheng Wang; Xin-Yu Cai; Jun-Bo Liang; Jing-Ming Dong; Da-Peng Zhou; Kai Yu; Ming-Xin Wu; Jiu-Sheng He; Liang-Yuan Wen; Bao-Qing Yu; Jian Wang; Jun Yang; Feng-Fei Lin; Bing-Zuan Li; Zong-Xin Shi; Bao-Jun Wang; Ai-Guo Wang; Gui-Ling Peng; Xu Sun; Hong-Hao Xiao; Meng Mi; Xia Zhao; Chang-Run Li; Gang Liu; Shao-Liang Li; Hang-Yu Gu; Yuan Zhou; Zhe-Lun Tan; Xin-Bao Wu
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.667

5.  Venous thromboembolism after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis.

Authors:  Nikoletta A Theochari; Christina A Theochari; Damianos G Kokkinidis; Aristotelis Kechagias; Orestis Lyros; Stefanos Giannopoulos; Styliani Mantziari; Dimitrios Schizas
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Impact of Treatment Modalities on Survival of Patients With Locoregional Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hui-Shan Chen; Wei-Heng Hung; Jiunn-Liang Ko; Po-Kuei Hsu; Chia-Chuan Liu; Shiao-Chi Wu; Ching-Hsiung Lin; Bing-Yen Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  A Preoperative Spinal Education intervention for spinal fusion surgery designed using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System is safe and could reduce hospital length of stay, normalize expectations, and reduce anxiety : a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca Edwards; Jamie Gibson; Escye Mungin-Jenkins; Rashida Pickford; Jonathan D Lucas; Gareth D Jones
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-02

8.  Effects of Different Anesthetic and Analgesic Methods on Cellular Immune Function and Stress Hormone Levels in Patients Undergoing Esophageal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Chaojun Hu; Shan Zhang; Qian Chen; Rong Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Is there a relationship between two different anesthetic methods and postoperative length of stay during radical resection of malignant esophageal tumors in China?: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jieping Yang; Xukeng Guo; Zonggui Zheng; Weiqi Ke
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 10.  Understanding Complete Pathologic Response in Oesophageal Cancer: Implications for Management and Survival.

Authors:  K E O'Sullivan; E T Hurley; J P Hurley
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 2.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.