Literature DB >> 25658007

A trichrome beam model for biological dose calculation in scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning.

T Inaniwa, N Kanematsu.   

Abstract

In scanned carbon-ion (C-ion) radiotherapy, some primary C-ions undergo nuclear reactions before reaching the target and the resulting particles deliver doses to regions at a significant distance from the central axis of the beam. The effects of these particles on physical dose distribution are accounted for in treatment planning by representing the transverse profile of the scanned C-ion beam as the superposition of three Gaussian distributions. In the calculation of biological dose distribution, however, the radiation quality of the scanned C-ion beam has been assumed to be uniform over its cross-section, taking the average value over the plane at a given depth (monochrome model). Since these particles, which have relatively low radiation quality, spread widely compared to the primary C-ions, the radiation quality of the beam should vary with radial distance from the central beam axis. To represent its transverse distribution, we propose a trichrome beam model in which primary C-ions, heavy fragments with atomic number Z ≥ 3, and light fragments with Z ≤ 2 are assigned to the first, second, and third Gaussian components, respectively. Assuming a realistic beam-delivery system, we performed computer simulations using Geant4 Monte Carlo code for analytical beam modeling of the monochrome and trichrome models. The analytical beam models were integrated into a treatment planning system for scanned C-ion radiotherapy. A target volume of 20  ×  20  ×  40 mm(3) was defined within a water phantom. A uniform biological dose of 2.65 Gy (RBE) was planned for the target with the two beam models based on the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM). The plans were recalculated with Geant4, and the recalculated biological dose distributions were compared with the planned distributions. The mean target dose of the recalculated distribution with the monochrome model was 2.72 Gy (RBE), while the dose with the trichrome model was 2.64 Gy (RBE). The monochrome model underestimated the RBE within the target due to the assumption of no radial variations in radiation quality. Conversely, the trichrome model accurately predicted the RBE even in a small target. Our results verify the applicability of the trichrome model for clinical use in C-ion radiotherapy treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658007     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Physical and biological beam modeling for carbon beam scanning at Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center.

Authors:  Shinichiro Fujitaka; Yusuke Fujii; Hideaki Nihongi; Satoshi Nakayama; Masaaki Takashina; Noriaki Hamatani; Toshiro Tsubouchi; Masashi Yagi; Kazumasa Minami; Kazuhiko Ogawa; Junetsu Mizoe; Tatsuaki Kanai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Single-energy metal artefact reduction with CT for carbon-ion radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Kentaro Miki; Shinichiro Mori; Azusa Hasegawa; Kensuke Naganawa; Masashi Koto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Late normal tissue response in the rat spinal cord after carbon ion irradiation.

Authors:  Maria Saager; Peter Peschke; Thomas Welzel; Lifi Huang; Stephan Brons; Rebecca Grün; Michael Scholz; Jürgen Debus; Christian P Karger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Carbon ion radiotherapy: impact of tumor differentiation on local control in experimental prostate carcinomas.

Authors:  Christin Glowa; Peter Peschke; Stephan Brons; Oliver C Neels; Klaus Kopka; Jürgen Debus; Christian P Karger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Commissioning a newly developed treatment planning system, VQA Plan, for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams.

Authors:  Masashi Yagi; Toshiro Tsubouchi; Noriaki Hamatani; Masaaki Takashina; Hiroyasu Maruo; Shinichiro Fujitaka; Hideaki Nihongi; Kazuhiko Ogawa; Tatsuaki Kanai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  FRoG-A New Calculation Engine for Clinical Investigations with Proton and Carbon Ion Beams at CNAO.

Authors:  KyungDon Choi; Stewart B Mein; Benedikt Kopp; Giuseppe Magro; Silvia Molinelli; Mario Ciocca; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Comparison of passive and scanning irradiation methods for carbon-ion radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Matsubara; Kumiko Karasawa; Wataru Furuichi; Mitsuji Wakaisami; Shintaro Shiba; Masaru Wakatsuki; Tokuhiko Omatsu; Taku Inaniwa; Shigekazu Fukuda; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.