Literature DB >> 25658006

Nuclear-interaction correction of integrated depth dose in carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning.

T Inaniwa, N Kanematsu, Y Hara, T Furukawa.   

Abstract

In treatment planning of charged-particle therapy, tissue heterogeneity is conventionally modeled as water with various densities, i.e. stopping effective densities ρ(S), and the integrated depth dose measured in water (IDD) is applied accordingly for the patient dose calculation. Since the chemical composition of body tissues is different from that of water, this approximation causes dose calculation errors, especially due to difference in nuclear interactions. Here, we propose and validate an IDD correction method for these errors in patient dose calculations. For accurate handling of nuclear interactions, ρ(S) of the patient is converted to nuclear effective density ρ(N), defined as the ratio of the probability of nuclear interactions in the tissue to that in water using a recently formulated semi-empirical relationship between the two. The attenuation correction factor Φ(w)(p), defined as the ratio of the attenuation of primary carbon ions in a patient to that in water, is calculated from a linear integration of ρ(N) along the beam path. In our treatment planning system, a carbon-ion beam is modeled to be composed of three components according to their transverse beam sizes: primary carbon ions, heavier fragments, and lighter fragments. We corrected the dose contribution from primary carbon ions to IDD as proportional to Φ(w)(p), and corrected that from lighter fragments as inversely proportional to Φ(w)(p). We tested the correction method for some non-water materials, e.g. milk, lard, ethanol and water solution of potassium phosphate (K2HPO4), with un-scanned and scanned carbon-ion beams. In un-scanned beams, the difference in IDD between a beam penetrating a 150 mm-thick layer of lard and a beam penetrating water of the corresponding thickness amounted to -4%, while it was +6% for a 150 mm-thick layer of 40% K2HPO4. The observed differences were accurately predicted by the correction method. The corrected IDDs agreed with the measurements within ±1% for all materials and combinations of them. In scanned beams, the dose estimation error in target dose amounted to 4% for a 150 mm-thick layer of 40% K2HPO4. The error is significantly reduced with the correction method. The planned dose distributions with the method agreed with the measurements within ±1.5% of target dose for all materials not only in the target region but also in the plateau and fragment-tail regions. We tested the correction method of IDD in some non-water materials to verify that this method would offer the accuracy and simplicity required in carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658006     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Single-energy metal artefact reduction with CT for carbon-ion radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Kentaro Miki; Shinichiro Mori; Azusa Hasegawa; Kensuke Naganawa; Masashi Koto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Technical Note: validation of a material assignment method for a retrospective study of carbon-ion radiotherapy using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Weishan Chang; Yusuke Koba; Takuya Furuta; Shunsuke Yonai; Shintaro Hashimoto; Shinnosuke Matsumoto; Tatsuhiko Sato
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Commissioning a newly developed treatment planning system, VQA Plan, for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams.

Authors:  Masashi Yagi; Toshiro Tsubouchi; Noriaki Hamatani; Masaaki Takashina; Hiroyasu Maruo; Shinichiro Fujitaka; Hideaki Nihongi; Kazuhiko Ogawa; Tatsuaki Kanai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Comparison of passive and scanning irradiation methods for carbon-ion radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Matsubara; Kumiko Karasawa; Wataru Furuichi; Mitsuji Wakaisami; Shintaro Shiba; Masaru Wakatsuki; Tokuhiko Omatsu; Taku Inaniwa; Shigekazu Fukuda; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.