Literature DB >> 25657784

Chemical composition and antiprolifrative activity of Artemisia persica Boiss. and Artemisia turcomanica Gand. essential oils.

M R Nikbakht1, S Sharifi2, S A Emami3, L Khodaie4.   

Abstract

Essential oils obtained from aerial parts of Artemisia persica and Artemisia turcomanica were analyzed by GC/MS. While 28 components representing 91.01 % of A. persica were identified, the identity of 50 components, constituting 81.93 % of the total oil, was confirmed in A. turcomanica. β-thujone was the main compound (75.23%) in A. persica while the major identified phytochemicals in A. turcomanica were 1,8-cineol (19.23%), camphor (15.55%) and filifolone (15.53%). Both of the essential oils were predominantly made up of monoterpenes. Time- and dose-dependent cytotoxic effects of A. persica and A. turcomanica on MCF-7 cell line evaluated by MTT assay at 24, 48 and 72 h, showed that the highest cytotoxic effect of A. persica and A. turcomanica were appeared at 72 h incubation. At that incubation period, CI50 of A. persica was found to be 0.15 μg/ml, while that of A. turcomanica was 0.1 μg/ml. Thus, cytotoxicity of A. turcomanica was slightly higher than A. persica which could be attributed to the higher content of sesquiterpene present in A. turcomanica. As a conclusion, these volatile oils could have chemotherapeutic potentials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artemisia persica; Artemisia turcomanica; Cytotoxicity; Essential oil; MCF-7

Year:  2014        PMID: 25657784      PMCID: PMC4311293     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Pharm Sci        ISSN: 1735-5362


INTRODUCTION

Essential oils as the secondary metabolites of medicinal plants, have indicated lots of biological effects and play a vital role as cytotoxic agents (12). Artemisia genus belonging to Asteraceae (Compositeae) family which contains 34 species growing in Iran (3), comprises aromatic plants known for their potent chemical constituents in their essential oils with antibacterial (45), antiviral (6), antifungal (457), insecticidal (89) and cytotoxic activity (10). In prior studies, MTT assay, has been carried out on different species of Artemisia extracts on different cell lines including human breast carcinoma cell line (MCF-7) (1112). To the best of our knowledge, cytotoxic activities of essential oils of Artemisia persica and A. turcomanica against cancer cell lines have not yet been reported. In previous studies, composition of volatile oils of these two species collected from different geogra-phical locations has been reported (131415). Due to the effect of harvesting time and season, geographical location, altitude and climate on the yield and composition of volatile oils (1617), firstly chemical composition of the essential oils of these two plants growing in Razavi Khorasan and North Khorasan provinces of Iran collected in September was determined. Considering both cytotoxic activity of volatile oils of other Artemisia species and existence of some cytotoxic components in A. persica and A. turcomanica, secondly we aimed to evaluate cytotoxic activity of A. persica and A. turcomanica against MCF-7 cancer cell line and to explore the relationship between chemical composition and cytotoxic activity of the essential oils of A. persica and A. turcomanica.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and preparation of essential oils

Aerial parts of A. persica Boiss. and A. turcomanica Gand. were collected from Zaveh (Razavi Khorasan province, Iran) and Bojnourd (North Khorasan province, Iran), respectively in September 2010. Identification of these plants was carried out by Dr. Valiollah Mozaffarian (Research Institute of Forest and Rangelands, Tehran, Iran). Voucher specimens (No. 12502 for A. persica and 12573 for A. turcomanica) have been deposited in the herbarium of Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. For the next step, air dried and ground stems and leaves of each species (90 g) were separately subjected to Clevenger-type apparatus by the aid of distilled water (1000 ml) for 4 h. After that the oils were measured and stored in dark glasses at 4 °C for further studies.

GC-Mass analysis

The essential oils of A. persica and A. turcomanica were analyzed using a Shimadzu GC/MS-QP5050A gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) fused with a capillary column of silica DB-1 (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness) with ionization potential of 70 ev. The injector temperature and split ratio were adjusted at 240 °C and 1/31, respectively. The flow rate of nitrogen as a carrier gas was 1.3 ml/min and the oven temperature programming was as follows: temperature was kept at 60 °C for 2 min then it raised to 260 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min. Afterwards it was maintained at 260 °C for 2 min. Components of essential oils were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with the NIST NBS54K Library. Kovats indices of components were obtained by the aid of standard n-alkanes (C8–C20) injection, under the same chromatographic conditions.

MTT assay

In vitro cell growth inhibition of A. persica and A. turcomanica essential oils were evaluated by MTT assay against MCF-7 cell line. Alive cell's mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase enzyme can reduce yellow colored MTT to a blue product of formazan. This process shows normal operation of mitochondria and cell viability as well (18). The human breast cancer MCF-7 cell line, obtained from national cell bank of Iran (Pasteur institute, Iran), were cultivated in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI 1640) medium (Gibco, UK) enriched with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). For prevention of bacterial contamination, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 units/ml penicillin G were added. MCF-7 cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. When cells reached ~ 90% confluency, they were detached from T-flask by the aid of 0.05% trypsin/EDTA. Cells were seeded in 96-well plate, at a density of 15000 cells/well.

Experimental design

After 24 h, the cultivated cells were treated with several concentrations of A. persica and A. turcomanica (10, 1, 0.5, 0.2, 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.005 μg/ml) prepared in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and incubated for 24, 48 and 72 h. Varying concentrations of A. persica and A. turcomanica essential oils were tested in triplicate. Negative control groups treated with 1% DMSO, as a solubilizing agent, stayed untreated in four wells. Afterwards, culture medium was changed with 150 μl RPMI-1640 medium plus 50 μl MTT solution (5 mg/ml in phosphate buffer solution). Cells were kept at 37 °C with 95% air, 5% CO2 and complete humidity for 4 h. Then, the MTT solution was replaced with 200 μl DMSO, incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. Finally, the optical density of the wells was measured at 570 nm spectrophotometrically using a plate reader (Sunrise Tecan, Austria). The MTT assays were replicated twice in triplicate. Cytotoxicity index of A. persica and A. turcomanica essential oils were calculated as CI%, according to following formula (19202122). CI%=(1 - (optical-density of sample/optical density of control)) ×100 Cytotoxic potency of A. persica and A. turcomanica were determined as CI50 from the curves of Cytotoxicity Index (CI %), versus different concentrations of A. persica and A. turcomanica (μg/ml) essential oils, respectively.

RESULTS

Volatile oils yielded by hydrodistillation of aerial parts of A. persica and A. turcomanica were 0.62% and 0.78 % (v/w), respectively. Table 1 and 2 demonstrate components of essential oils listed in order of their elution from DB1 column. Phytochemicals were analyzed by GC-MS qualitatively and also quantitatively.
Table 1

GC/Mass data of A. persica essential oil.

Table 2

GC-Mass data of A. torcomanica essential oil.

GC/Mass data of A. persica essential oil. GC-Mass data of A. torcomanica essential oil. Twenty eight components consisting 91.01 % of total oil of A. persica were identified. Among identified constituents, β-thujone was the major and main compound (75.23%). Additionally, percentage of 1, 8-cineol (2.38%), α-thujone (2.84%) and 4-terpineol (2.16%) were more than other identified components. As it is apparent from Table 1, the majority of the components belong to monoterpene groups (88.01%). Moreover sesquiterpens (0.54%) and non- isoprenoid components (1.41%) exist in lower percentages. GC/MS analysis of A. turcomanica essential oil afforded 50 phytochemicals representing 82.01% of total oil. As shown in Table 2, the major identified phytochemicals included 1, 8-cineol (19.23%), camphor (15.55%), filifolone (15.54%), brevifolin (6.19%) and cis-jasmone (4.31%). Table 2 also indicates that, the majority of components belongs to monoterpenes (68. 66%). Phyto-chemicals present with lower percentage belong to sesquiterpene (2.14%) and non-terpene components (11.13%). Tables 3 and 4 are reported for the sake of comparison of major compounds of A. persica and A. turcomanica volatile oils growing in different regions and climates. Table 3 exhibits percentages of major constituents of essential oils of Isfahan A. persica, Indian A. persica, Iranian A. persica and A. persica studied in the current work.
Table 3

Percent of major compounds in different A. persica essential oils growing in different areas.

Table 4

Percent of major compounds in different parts of A. turcomanica essential oils growing in different areas.

Percent of major compounds in different A. persica essential oils growing in different areas. Percent of major compounds in different parts of A. turcomanica essential oils growing in different areas. Table 4 shows percentages of major compositions of essential oils of Khorasan A. turcomanica leaves and stems, Iranian A. turcomanica leaves and stems and essential oil of A. turcomanica investigated in the present study. Results of time and dose dependent cytotoxic effects of A. persica and A. turcomanica essential oils on MCF-7 cell line evaluated by using MTT assay are shown in Figs. 1 and 2 which were extracted from the plots of cytotoxicity percentages versus essential oils concentrations at 24, 48 and 72 h.
Fig. 1

Effect of essential oil of A. persica on cell proliferation of MCF-7 cell line displayed as percentage of cytotoxicity index, versus concentration of A. persica at 24, 48 and 72 h.

Fig. 2

Effect of essential oil of A. turcomanica on cell proliferation of MCF-7 cell Line displayed as percentage of cytotoxicity index, versus concentration of A. turcomanica at 24, 48 and 72 h.

Effect of essential oil of A. persica on cell proliferation of MCF-7 cell line displayed as percentage of cytotoxicity index, versus concentration of A. persica at 24, 48 and 72 h. Effect of essential oil of A. turcomanica on cell proliferation of MCF-7 cell Line displayed as percentage of cytotoxicity index, versus concentration of A. turcomanica at 24, 48 and 72 h. As it is evident in Fig. 1, when the results of control group were compared to those of A. persica essential oil-treated cells, dose and time dependent cytotoxicity was clearly demonstrated. At concentration of 0.5 μg/ml, cytotoxicity of the essential oil of A. persica reached 100% at times greater than 24 h. As it is apparent in Fig. 2, when the results of control group were compared with those of A. turcomanica essential oil-treated cells, dose and time dependent cytotoxicity could be clearly observed. Therefore, at 1 μg/ml concentration, cytotoxicity reached to 100% at times higher than 24 h. Thus, A. persica and A. turcomanica essential oils were significantly cytotoxic on MCF-7 cell line in a dose and time dependent manner. Highest cytotoxic effect of A. persica and A. turcomanica essential oils was appeared at 72 h incubation. At that incubation period, CI50 of A. persica and A. turcomanica was 0.15 and 0.1 μg/ml, respectively. Thus, cytotoxicity of A. turcomanica was slightly higher than that of A. persica.

DISCUSSION

Artemisia species have always been of interest in Iranian traditional medicine as antipyretic, wound healer, vermifuge, tonic of stomach, antiflatulent and for their high essence content with pleasant odor and valuable pharmacological effects. Biological activities of Artemisia species could be due to secondary metabolites such as monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, especially sesquiterpene lactones (2324). For instance, artemisinin, derived from A. annua, is a sesquiterpene lactone and considered as a novel antimalarial agent (25). Bisabololoxides as a rare type of sesquiterpenoids and antiplasmodial constituents as well as scopoletin sesquiterpene ethers have been purified from A. persica (2627). Aerial parts of A. turcomanica yielded several known mono- and sesquiterpenes (28). Similar to the extracts of Artemisia species, wide range of biological effects especially cytotoxic activity (10) which is of great importance as chemotherapeutic agents has been observed in volatile oils of these plants (45678910). Table 3 shows major constituents of A. persica essential oils grown in different regions. As evident in this table, main constituents of essential oils are not in common. β-thujone (75.23%) is the major component of A. persica as found in the current study which can be called β-thujone chemotype, while the main constituents of Isfahan A. persica, Indian A. persica and Iranian A. persica are davanone (60.56%), sabinen hydrate acetate (76.74%) and cis-ocimenone (39.60%) respectively. Furthermore, other major components presents in A. persica investigated in the current study do not exist in Isfahan A. persica, Indian A. persica and Iranian A. persica except α-thujone which showed higher percentage in Isfahan A. persica (3.60%) than A. persica (2.84%) (15293031). Table 4 demonstrates major composition of A. turcomanica essential oils grown in different regions. As seen in this table, Khorasan A. turcomanica leaves, Khorasan A. turcomanica stems, Iranian A. turcomanica leaves, Iranian A. turcomanica stems and A. turcomanica assessed in the current study are in common by containing camphor. All of the volatile oils in table 4 contain 1,8 cineol except Iranian A. turcomanica leaves. in the percentage of this substance in A. turcomanica is more than other essential oils constituents, so it can be called 1,8 cineol chemotype (1332). According to previous studies, different factors such as harvesting time and season, geographical location, altitude, climate and other factors including geno type, reproductive stage, cutting height, drying condition could extremely affect the yield and composition of volatile oils of the same species (3334). In this study, the effect of geographical location, climate and month of collection are shown on the phytochemical composition of A. persica and A. turcomanica essential oils Cytotoxicity of A. persica and A. turcomanica were evaluated by MTT assay, a simple and reliable experiment which measures cell viability and cytotoxicity for screening cytotoxic agents (35). Results of this test could be a basis for finding further chemotherapeutic agents. Findings of this experiment demonstrated that A. persica and A. turcomanica were strongly cytotoxic on MCF-7 cell line in a dose and time dependent manner. Chemical composition of A. persica, indicated that its cytotoxic effect could be attributed in part to the high content of β-thujone (75.23%) and low content of α-thujone (more toxic than β-stereoisomer). Previous studies have reported cytotoxic effect of thujone on A375, monkey's kidney cell lines and its anticancer potentials (36373839). Cytotoxicity of A. turcomanica, to some extent, could be attributed to the high content of 1, 8-cineol (19.23%) and camphor (15.55%), which are toxic constituents as previously reported (40). Furthermore, it has been indicated that fractions with higher content of sesquiterpenes show anticancer activity (41), so higher toxicity of A. turcomanica could be somehow explained by its higher sesquiterpene content (2.14%) compared to A. persica (0.53%). Comparison of CI50 of A. persica and A. turcomanica with CI50 of extracts and essential oils of some species of Artemisia and Asteraceae family against MCF-7 cells is very promising and illustrates higher anticancer capacity of A. persica and A. turcomanica against breast cancer carcinoma cell line (1142434445).

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that the volatile oils of A. persica and A. turcomanica could have chemotherapeutic potentials. Further investiga-tions are needed to isolate cytotoxic constituents from the essential oils of these two plants and clarify their molecular mechanisms as well as understanding the effects of A. persica and A. turcomanica on other cell lines.
  24 in total

1.  Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Artemisia annua essential oil.

Authors:  Fabien Juteau; Veronique Masotti; Jean Marie Bessière; Michel Dherbomez; Josette Viano
Journal:  Fitoterapia       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Chemical composition and anticancer activity of leaf essential oil of Myrica gale L.

Authors:  M Sylvestre; J Legault; D Dufour; A Pichette
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.340

3.  The essential oil of Artemisia scoparia from tajikistan is dominated by phenyldiacetylenes.

Authors:  Farukh S Sharopov; William N Setzer
Journal:  Nat Prod Commun       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.986

4.  Essential oil analysis and anticancer activity of leaf essential oil of Croton flavens L. from Guadeloupe.

Authors:  Muriel Sylvestre; André Pichette; Angélique Longtin; Francine Nagau; Jean Legault
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.360

5.  Liposomal incorporation of Artemisia arborescens L. essential oil and in vitro antiviral activity.

Authors:  Chiara Sinico; Alessandro De Logu; Francesco Lai; Donatella Valenti; Maria Manconi; Giuseppe Loy; Leonardo Bonsignore; Anna Maria Fadda
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.571

6.  Repellent and insecticidal activities of essential oils from Artemisia princeps and Cinnamomum camphora and their effect on seed germination of wheat and broad bean.

Authors:  C H Liu; A K Mishra; R X Tan; C Tang; H Yang; Y F Shen
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Bisabololoxide derivatives from Artemisia persica, and determination of their absolute configurations by ECD.

Authors:  Fahimeh Moradi-Afrapoli; Samad Nejad Ebrahimi; Martin Smiesko; Melanie Raith; Stefanie Zimmermann; Farsad Nadjafi; Reto Brun; Matthias Hamburger
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 4.072

8.  Evaluation of aqueous extracts of Taraxacum officinale on growth and invasion of breast and prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Sophia C Sigstedt; Carla J Hooten; Manika C Callewaert; Aaron R Jenkins; Anntherese E Romero; Michael J Pullin; Alexander Kornienko; Timothy K Lowrey; Severine Van Slambrouck; Wim F A Steelant
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.650

9.  Antibacterial efficiency of Finnish spice essential oils against pathogenic and spoilage bacteria.

Authors:  Mari Nevas; Anna-Riitta Korhonen; Miia Lindström; Pekka Turkki; Hannu Korkeala
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 10.  Secondary metabolites from Inula britannica L. and their biological activities.

Authors:  Abdul Latif Khan; Javid Hussain; Muhammad Hamayun; Syed Abdullah Gilani; Shabir Ahmad; Gauhar Rehman; Yoon-Ha Kim; Sang-Mo Kang; In-Jung Lee
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ginger from ancient times to the new outlook.

Authors:  Laleh Khodaie; Omid Sadeghpoor
Journal:  Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod       Date:  2015-01-17

2.  The Protective Effect of Different Extracts of Three Artemisia Species against H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in PC12 Neuronal Cells.

Authors:  Leila Hosseinzadeh; Alireza Malekshahi; Farahnaz Ahmadi; Seyed Ahmad Emami; Marziyeh Hajialyani; Mahdi Mojarrab
Journal:  Pharmacognosy Res       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

3.  Comparison of the cytotoxic effects of different fractions of Artemisia ciniformis and Artemisia biennis on B16/F10, PC3 and MCF7 Cells.

Authors:  Elham Ramazani; Zahra Tayarani-Najaran; Yalda Shokoohinia; Mahdi Mojarrab
Journal:  Res Pharm Sci       Date:  2020-07-03

4.  Halophyte Artemisia caerulescens L.: Metabolites from In Vitro Shoots and Wild Plants.

Authors:  Ylenia Pieracci; Martina Vento; Luisa Pistelli; Tiziana Lombardi; Laura Pistelli
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15

5.  Cytotoxic Activity and Phytochemical Analysis of Artemisia haussknechtii Boiss.

Authors:  Sajjad Nasseri; Mohammad-Reza Delnavazi; Farshad H Shirazi; Faraz Mojab
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 1.962

6.  Improvement of citral antimicrobial activity by incorporation into nanostructured lipid carriers: a potential application in food stuffs as a natural preservative.

Authors:  Manijeh Mokarizadeh; Hossein Samadi Kafil; Saeed Ghanbarzadeh; Ainaz Alizadeh; Hamed Hamishehkar
Journal:  Res Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.