| Literature DB >> 25657726 |
Bo Zhao1, Guowei Shang1, Jian Chen1, Xiaokun Geng1, Xin Ye2, Guoxun Xu2, Ju Wang3, Jiasheng Zheng4, Hongjun Li4, Fauzia Akbary5, Shengli Li3, Jing Lu3, Feng Ling1, Xunming Ji6.
Abstract
Endovascular surgery is advantageous in experimentally induced ischemic stroke because it causes fewer cranial traumatic lesions than invasive surgery and can closely mimic the pathophysiology in stroke patients. However, the outcomes are highly variable, which limits the accuracy of evaluations of ischemic stroke studies. In this study, eight healthy adult rhesus monkeys were randomized into two groups with four monkeys in each group: middle cerebral artery occlusion at origin segment (M1) and middle cerebral artery occlusion at M2 segment. The blood flow in the middle cerebral artery was blocked completely for 2 hours using the endovascular microcoil placement technique (1 mm × 10 cm) (undetachable), to establish a model of cerebral ischemia. The microcoil was withdrawn and the middle cerebral artery blood flow was restored. A reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion model was identified by hematoxylin-eosin staining, digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and neurological evaluation. The results showed that the middle cerebral artery occlusion model was successfully established in eight adult healthy rhesus monkeys, and ischemic lesions were apparent in the brain tissue of rhesus monkeys at 24 hours after occlusion. The rhesus monkeys had symptoms of neurological deficits. Compared with the M1 occlusion group, the M2 occlusion group had lower infarction volume and higher neurological scores. These experimental findings indicate that reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion can be produced with the endovascular microcoil technique in rhesus monkeys. The M2 occluded model had less infarction and less neurological impairment, which offers the potential for application in the field of brain injury research.Entities:
Keywords: brain injury; digital subtraction angiography; infarction; interventional therapy; magnetic resonance image; microcoil; model middle cerebral artery; nerve regeneration; neuroimaging; neuroregeneration; rhesus monkeys; stroke
Year: 2014 PMID: 25657726 PMCID: PMC4316474 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.147936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Regen Res ISSN: 1673-5374 Impact factor: 5.135
Scoring system for neurological evaluations
Life indicators of the rhesus monkeys subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion
Figure 1Images of the M1 segment in the rhesus monkey models of middle cerebral artery occlusion.
(A) Digital subtraction of angiographic images. Arrow points to microcoil release in the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (normal laterality). (B) Magnetic resonance angiography. Triangle indicates where the middle cerebral artery was occluded in the M1 segment. (C) Representative T2-weighted image of strokes 2 hours after middle cerebral artery occlusion (high signal intensity). (D) Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Arrows point to a large infarction (whitish area) in the right hemisphere. Ant: Anterior; Post: posterior; L: left; R: right.
Figure 2Images of the M2 segment in the rhesus monkey models of middle cerebral artery occlusion.
(A) Digital subtraction of angiographic images. Arrow points to microcoil release in the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (normal laterality). (B) Magnetic resonance angiography. Triangle indicates where the middle cerebral artery was occluded in the M2 segment. (C) Representative T2-weighted image of stroke 2 hours after middle cere-bral artery occlusion (high signal intensity). Ischemic area was around the Sylvian fissure. (D) Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Arrows point to a smallish infarction (whitish area) in the right hemisphere that included cortex and sub-cortical white matter. Ant: Anterior; Post: posterior; L: left; R: right.
Figure 4Correlation analysis of infarct volume and neurological evaluation scores in the two groups.
Pearson parametric correlation analysis showed that ischemic damage measured by MRI was significantly negatively correlated with neuro-logical evaluations (stroke scores). “■”: M1 occlusion group; “▲”: M2 occlusion group; “—” : the linear regression line; “::::::::”: the 95% confidence band of the best-fit line.