Literature DB >> 25657369

Implementation of an accelerated physical examination course in a doctor of pharmacy program.

Jackie Ho1, Monica K Bidwal1, Ingrid C Lopes1, Bijal M Shah1, Eric J Ip1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the implementation of a 1-day accelerated physical examination course for a doctor of pharmacy program and to evaluate pharmacy students' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in performing physical examination.
DESIGN: Using a flipped teaching approach, course coordinators collaborated with a physician faculty member to design and develop the objectives of the course. Knowledge, attitude, and confidence survey questions were administered before and after the practical laboratory. ASSESSMENT: Following the practical laboratory, knowledge improved by 8.3% (p<0.0001). Students' perceived ability and confidence to perform a physical examination significantly improved (p<0.0001). A majority of students responded that reviewing the training video (81.3%) and reading material (67.4%) prior to the practical laboratory was helpful in learning the physical examination.
CONCLUSION: An accelerated physical examination course using a flipped teaching approach was successful in improving students' knowledge of, attitudes about, and confidence in using physical examination skills in pharmacy practice.

Keywords:  curriculum design; flipped curriculum; patient assessment; physical assessment; physical examination

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25657369      PMCID: PMC4315204          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7810182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

1.  ASHP statement on the pharmacist's role in primary care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  Physical assessment experience in a problem-based learning course.

Authors:  Justin J Sherman; Daniel M Riche; Kayla R Stover
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Integration of physical assessment within a pathophysiology course for pharmacy.

Authors:  Christian B Albano; Wendy Brown
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Redesign and evaluation of a patient assessment course.

Authors:  Diana M Sobieraj; Desmond McCaffrey; Jennifer J Lee
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Teaching patient assessment skills to doctor of pharmacy students: the TOPAS study.

Authors:  Jeffery W Spray; Sarah A Parnapy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Pharmacist instruction of physical assessment for pharmacy students.

Authors:  Scott Bolesta; Dominick P Trombetta; Daniel S Longyhore
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Pharmacists' contributions to primary care in the United States collaborating to address unmet patient care needs: the emerging role for pharmacists to address the shortage of primary care providers.

Authors:  Patti Gasdek Manolakis; Jann B Skelton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Comparison of patient simulation methods used in a physical assessment course.

Authors:  Gloria R Grice; Philip Wenger; Natalie Brooks; Tricia M Berry
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Assessing the performance and satisfaction of medical residents utilizing standardized patient versus mannequin-simulated training.

Authors:  Ali A Alsaad; Swetha Davuluri; Vandana Y Bhide; Amy M Lannen; Michael J Maniaci
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2017-07-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.