Literature DB >> 25657279

Draft genome sequences of five new strains of methylophilaceae isolated from lake washington sediment.

Tami L McTaggart1, Gabrielle Benuska1, Nicole Shapiro2, Tanja Woyke2, Ludmila Chistoserdova3.   

Abstract

We sequenced the genomes of five new Methylophilaceae strains isolated from Lake Washington sediment. We used the new sequences to sort these new strains into specific Methylophilaceae ecotypes, including one novel ecotype. The new genomes expand the known diversity of Methylophilaceae and provide new models for studying the ecology of methylotrophy.
Copyright © 2015 McTaggart et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25657279      PMCID: PMC4319602          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.01511-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

We recently described the diversity of Methylophilaceae from Lake Washington through an analysis of the genomes and the phenotypes of 11 strains, separating them into eight distinct ecotypes: Methylotenera mobilis JLW8, M. mobilis 13, Methylotenera versatilis 301, Methylovorus glucosotrophus, Methylophilaceae 7, Methylophilaceae 11, Methylophilus methylotrophus Brown, and M. methylotrophus White (1). Here, we report the draft genome sequences of five additional strains from Lake Washington sediment, isolated using the techniques described by Beck et al. (1). Strain 7 was isolated from the 2011 sample (1), strain G11 was isolated from the 2013 sample (2), strain L2L1 was isolated from long-term methane enrichment (2), and strains Q8 and N17 were isolated from short-term methane enrichment (2). The draft genomes were generated at the Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) sequencing technology (3) and assembled using HGAP (version: 2.2.0.p1) (4), as part of the JGI sequencing pipeline (http://www.jgi.doe.gov). The genome statistics are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1

Strains described, closest relatives, genome statistics, accession numbers, and variable metabolic modules

StrainClosest relative% 16S rRNA gene identity% proteins with >80% identityTotal no. of base pairsNCBI accession no.Presence ofa:
MxaFIMADHNMGPNarABCNirKNorBD
Q8M. methylotrophus 110086.42,900,053JUHE00000000++
L2L1M. mobilis 1399.679.32,641,989JQMG00000000++++
N17Methylophilaceae 1199.988.52,753,666JUGE01000001+
7Methylophilaceae 797.369.12,503,174JUGF00000000++
Methylophilaceae G1197.621.32,503,174JUGF00000000++
G11M. versatilis 30198.521.22,545,099JUHH01000001++++
M. mobilis JLW897.537.02,545,099JUHH01000001++++

MxaFI, calcium-containing methanol dehydrogenase; MADH, methylamine dehydrogenase; NMGP, N-methylglutamate pathway; NarABC; NirK, dissimilatory nitrate and nitrite reductases; NorBD, nitric oxide reductase.

Strains described, closest relatives, genome statistics, accession numbers, and variable metabolic modules MxaFI, calcium-containing methanol dehydrogenase; MADH, methylamine dehydrogenase; NMGP, N-methylglutamate pathway; NarABC; NirK, dissimilatory nitrate and nitrite reductases; NorBD, nitric oxide reductase. Strain Q8 is most similar to M. methylotrophus sp. strain 1, and strain L2L1 is most similar to M. mobilis 13 (Table 1). The main difference in metabolic potential is the lack of the gene for nitrous oxide reductase in the genome of strain L2L1. Strain N17 is most similar to Methylophilaceae sp. strain 11 (Table 1). Strain 7 does not have close relatives; at the 16S rRNA gene identity level, it is related most closely to strain G11 and less related to the Methylophilaceae 7 ecotype. However, in terms of genome-genome similarity, this strain is more related to Methylophilaceae 7 (Table 1). Thus, we ascribed this strain to the Methylophilaceae 7 ecotype. Phenotypically, strain 7 is similar to other strains within this ecotype. However, it has a somewhat enhanced methylotrophy potential, encoding an additional XoxF enzyme and a true Fae that is missing from strains 73s and 79 (1). The protein encoded by this gene is most related to a Fae in the M. glucosotropus SIP3-4 genome (83%) (5), suggesting a horizontal transfer event. At 2,503 Mb, this genome is the smallest so far for Lake Washington Methylophilaceae. Strain G11 is the most novel strain of the set. In terms of 16S rRNA gene identity, it is most similar to M. versatilis 301, while in terms of genome-genome similarity, it is somewhat more related to M. mobilis JLW8 (Table 1). Thus, we identify this strain as a novel ecotype within Lake Washington Methylophilaceae. Like strains JLW8 and 301, G11 does not encode calcium-containing (MxaFI) methanol dehydrogenase but encodes three XoxF-type proteins. Like strain JLW8, it encodes methylamine dehydrogenase, and like strain 301, it encodes the N-methylglutamate pathway for methylamine oxidation (1). The availability of these new genomes further expands the diversity of Methylophilaceae from a single ecological niche and further points toward unexpected metabolic flexibility within this taxon. The new strains described here also expand the repertoire of model organisms that can be used to study the ecology of methylotrophy.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
  5 in total

1.  Genomes of three methylotrophs from a single niche reveal the genetic and metabolic divergence of the methylophilaceae.

Authors:  Alla Lapidus; Alicia Clum; Kurt Labutti; Marina G Kaluzhnaya; Sujung Lim; David A C Beck; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Marcel Huntemann; Susan Lucas; Mary E Lidstrom; Natalia Ivanova; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; David H Alexander; Patrick Marks; Aaron A Klammer; James Drake; Cheryl Heiner; Alicia Clum; Alex Copeland; John Huddleston; Evan E Eichler; Stephen W Turner; Jonas Korlach
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Methane-fed microbial microcosms show differential community dynamics and pinpoint taxa involved in communal response.

Authors:  Igor Y Oshkin; David A C Beck; Andrew E Lamb; Veronika Tchesnokova; Gabrielle Benuska; Tami L McTaggart; Marina G Kalyuzhnaya; Svetlana N Dedysh; Mary E Lidstrom; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules.

Authors:  John Eid; Adrian Fehr; Jeremy Gray; Khai Luong; John Lyle; Geoff Otto; Paul Peluso; David Rank; Primo Baybayan; Brad Bettman; Arkadiusz Bibillo; Keith Bjornson; Bidhan Chaudhuri; Frederick Christians; Ronald Cicero; Sonya Clark; Ravindra Dalal; Alex Dewinter; John Dixon; Mathieu Foquet; Alfred Gaertner; Paul Hardenbol; Cheryl Heiner; Kevin Hester; David Holden; Gregory Kearns; Xiangxu Kong; Ronald Kuse; Yves Lacroix; Steven Lin; Paul Lundquist; Congcong Ma; Patrick Marks; Mark Maxham; Devon Murphy; Insil Park; Thang Pham; Michael Phillips; Joy Roy; Robert Sebra; Gene Shen; Jon Sorenson; Austin Tomaney; Kevin Travers; Mark Trulson; John Vieceli; Jeffrey Wegener; Dawn Wu; Alicia Yang; Denis Zaccarin; Peter Zhao; Frank Zhong; Jonas Korlach; Stephen Turner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The expanded diversity of methylophilaceae from Lake Washington through cultivation and genomic sequencing of novel ecotypes.

Authors:  David A C Beck; Tami L McTaggart; Usanisa Setboonsarng; Alexey Vorobev; Marina G Kalyuzhnaya; Natalia Ivanova; Lynne Goodwin; Tanja Woyke; Mary E Lidstrom; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Oxygen availability is a major factor in determining the composition of microbial communities involved in methane oxidation.

Authors:  Maria E Hernandez; David A C Beck; Mary E Lidstrom; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Natural Selection in Synthetic Communities Highlights the Roles of Methylococcaceae and Methylophilaceae and Suggests Differential Roles for Alternative Methanol Dehydrogenases in Methane Consumption.

Authors:  Zheng Yu; David A C Beck; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Synthetic Methane-Consuming Communities from a Natural Lake Sediment.

Authors:  Zheng Yu; Joseph Groom; Yue Zheng; Ludmila Chistoserdova; Jing Huang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 7.867

4.  A Synthetic Ecology Perspective: How Well Does Behavior of Model Organisms in the Laboratory Predict Microbial Activities in Natural Habitats?

Authors:  Zheng Yu; Sascha M B Krause; David A C Beck; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Physiological Effect of XoxG(4) on Lanthanide-Dependent Methanotrophy.

Authors:  Yue Zheng; Jing Huang; Feng Zhao; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Lanthanide-Dependent Methanol Dehydrogenases of XoxF4 and XoxF5 Clades Are Differentially Distributed Among Methylotrophic Bacteria and They Reveal Different Biochemical Properties.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Zheng Yu; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.