Literature DB >> 25656656

Accuracy of ICD-9-CM coding to identify small for gestational age newborns.

Kelesitse Phiri1, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Lawrence C Tsen, Karen M Puopolo, John D Seeger, Brian T Bateman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis code for small for gestational age (SGA) recorded in administrative healthcare records using birthweight and gestational age information recorded in electronic medical records.
METHODS: We used billing and medical records from women aged 13-55 years who delivered at a tertiary care center in the USA between 2004 and 2011. Information on birthweight, gestational age at birth, and ICD-9-CM code for SGA, 656.5x, was abstracted from the database. Each infant's birthweight percentile for gestational age was calculated on the basis of published US references; infants below the 10th percentile were classified as SGA. The performance characteristics of SGA ICD-9-CM diagnosis code against SGA classification based on birthweight and gestational age were calculated, for all deliveries and by strata of demographic and delivery characteristics.
RESULTS: We identified 51 292 singleton live birth deliveries. The prevalence of SGA infants calculated from birthweight and gestational age at birth was higher (13%) than the prevalence based on ICD-9-CM code (2%). Sensitivity of the SGA ICD-9-CM code was 14.2%, specificity was 99.7%, positive predictive value was 86.8%, and negative predictive value was 88.4%. Stratification by demographic and delivery characteristics yielded similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: Identification of SGA infants using ICD-9-CM code, 656.5x, from administrative healthcare records has low sensitivity but high specificity; the accuracy did not differ across demographic and delivery characteristics. Thus, although this source of information would underestimate the prevalence of SGA, it could produce valid relative risk estimates.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICD-9-CM codes; gestational age; healthcare records; pharmacoepidemiology; sensitivity; small for gestational age; specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25656656      PMCID: PMC4533984          DOI: 10.1002/pds.3740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  28 in total

1.  Optimal birth weight percentile cut-offs in defining small- or large-for-gestational-age.

Authors:  H Xu; F Simonet; Z-C Luo
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 2.299

2.  CIHI survey: Hospital costs for preterm and small-for-gestational age babies in Canada.

Authors:  Gillian Lim; Jacinth Tracey; Nicole Boom; Sunita Karmakar; Joy Wang; Jean-Marie Berthelot; Caroline Heick
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M S Kramer
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Risk factors for small-for-gestational-age babies: The Auckland Birthweight Collaborative Study.

Authors:  J M Thompson; P M Clark; E Robinson; D M Becroft; N S Pattison; N Glavish; J E Pryor; C J Wild; K Rees; E A Mitchell
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.954

Review 5.  Small for gestational age: short stature and beyond.

Authors:  Paul Saenger; Paul Czernichow; Ieuan Hughes; Edward O Reiter
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 19.871

6.  Association between topiramate and zonisamide use during pregnancy and low birth weight.

Authors:  Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Robert Mittendorf; Caitlin R Smith; W Allen Hauser; Mark Yerby; Lewis B Holmes
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Highly active antiretroviral therapy and adverse birth outcomes among HIV-infected women in Botswana.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Chen; Heather J Ribaudo; Sajini Souda; Natasha Parekh; Anthony Ogwu; Shahin Lockman; Kathleen Powis; Scott Dryden-Peterson; Tracy Creek; William Jimbo; Tebogo Madidimalo; Joseph Makhema; Max Essex; Roger L Shapiro
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 8.  International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board consensus development conference statement: management of short children born small for gestational age, April 24-October 1, 2001.

Authors:  Peter A Lee; Steven D Chernausek; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega; Paul Czernichow
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Alcohol drinking and risk of small for gestational age birth.

Authors:  F Chiaffarino; F Parazzini; L Chatenoud; E Ricci; F Sandretti; S Cipriani; D Caserta; L Fedele
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  The outcome of pregnancy following topiramate treatment: a study on 52 pregnancies.

Authors:  Asher Ornoy; Naama Zvi; Judy Arnon; Rebecka Wajnberg; Svetlana Shechtman; Orna Diav-Citrin
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2008-03-16       Impact factor: 3.143

View more
  9 in total

1.  Association between Off-Peak Hour Birth and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality among Very Low Birth Weight Infants.

Authors:  Erik A Jensen; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Validity of claims-based algorithms to identify neurodevelopmental disorders in children.

Authors:  Loreen Straub; Brian T Bateman; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Cassandra York; Yanmin Zhu; Elizabeth A Suarez; Barry Lester; Lyndon Gonzalez; Ryan Hanson; Clara Hildebrandt; Joseph Homsi; Daniel Kang; Ken W K Lee; Zachary Lee; Linda Li; Mckenna Longacre; Nidhi Shah; Natalie Tukan; Frances Wallace; Christina Williams; Salim Zerriny; Helen Mogun; Krista F Huybrechts
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Valganciclovir Use Among Commercially and Medicaid-insured Infants With Congenital CMV Infection in the United States, 2009-2015.

Authors:  Jessica Leung; Sheila C Dollard; Scott D Grosse; Winnie Chung; ThuyQuynh Do; Manisha Patel; Tatiana M Lanzieri
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Neonatal Outcomes in a Medicaid Population With Opioid Dependence.

Authors:  Susan B Brogly; Sonia Hernández-Diaz; Emily Regan; Ela Fadli; Kristen A Hahn; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Emulating a target trial of the comparative effectiveness of clomiphene citrate and letrozole for ovulation induction.

Authors:  Jennifer J Yland; Yu-Han Chiu; Paolo Rinaudo; John Hsu; Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Agreement between blood pressure from research study visits versus electronic medical records and associations with hypertensive disorder diagnoses in pregnant women with overweight/obesity.

Authors:  Abbi D Lane-Cordova; Sara Wilcox; Bo Fernhall; Jihong Liu
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.430

7.  Trends in Costs of Birth Hospitalization and Readmissions for Late Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Rebecca R Speer; Eric W Schaefer; Mahoussi Aholoukpe; Douglas L Leslie; Chintan K Gandhi
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10

8.  Ischemic Placental Disease, Preterm Delivery, and Their Association With Opioid Use During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Daina B Esposito; Brian Bateman; Martha Werler; Loreen Straub; Helen Mogun; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Krista Huybrechts
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.363

9.  Warning of Immortal Time Bias When Studying Drug Safety in Pregnancy: Application to Late Use of Antibiotics and Preterm Delivery.

Authors:  Giovanni Corrao; Federico Rea; Matteo Franchi; Benedetta Beccalli; Anna Locatelli; Anna Cantarutti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.