OBJECTIVE: To examine reproductive coercion and partner violence among college women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive. SETTING: A large public university in the Northeast United States. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria were college women age 18 to 25, enrolled either full- or part-time, English speaking, and screened positive for relationship. Data from 972 women were analyzed. METHODS: An e-mail invitation to participate in an electronic survey was sent to undergraduate and graduate female students. A web link to the informed consent and inclusion criteria were provided. Students who affirmed they met inclusion criteria could proceed to the survey. Completion of the survey implied consent. RESULTS: Nearly 8% of participants (n = 76) reported reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion, birth control sabotage, or both. Women reported more pregnancy coercion (6.8%) than birth control sabotage (3.9%). Being told not to use any birth control was the most commonly reported act (6.8%, n = 62). Of women reporting reproductive coercion (n = 76), 57% also screened for positive relationship violence (95% confidence interval [CI] [2.74, 7.29]). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage occur among college women, and higher rates were reported among women with histories of partner violence. In addition to screening and counseling for partner violence, college health providers should assess for reproductive coercion and tailor contraceptive counseling discussions accordingly.
OBJECTIVE: To examine reproductive coercion and partner violence among college women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive. SETTING: A large public university in the Northeast United States. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria were college women age 18 to 25, enrolled either full- or part-time, English speaking, and screened positive for relationship. Data from 972 women were analyzed. METHODS: An e-mail invitation to participate in an electronic survey was sent to undergraduate and graduate female students. A web link to the informed consent and inclusion criteria were provided. Students who affirmed they met inclusion criteria could proceed to the survey. Completion of the survey implied consent. RESULTS: Nearly 8% of participants (n = 76) reported reproductive coercion, including pregnancy coercion, birth control sabotage, or both. Women reported more pregnancy coercion (6.8%) than birth control sabotage (3.9%). Being told not to use any birth control was the most commonly reported act (6.8%, n = 62). Of women reporting reproductive coercion (n = 76), 57% also screened for positive relationship violence (95% confidence interval [CI] [2.74, 7.29]). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy coercion and birth control sabotage occur among college women, and higher rates were reported among women with histories of partner violence. In addition to screening and counseling for partner violence, college health providers should assess for reproductive coercion and tailor contraceptive counseling discussions accordingly.
Authors: Amber L Hill; Hadas Zachor; Kelley A Jones; Janine Talis; Sarah Zelazny; Elizabeth Miller Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Heather L McCauley; Jay G Silverman; Kelley A Jones; Daniel J Tancredi; Michele R Decker; Marie C McCormick; S Bryn Austin; Heather A Anderson; Elizabeth Miller Journal: Contraception Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 3.375