Literature DB >> 25656544

Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: A capabilities perspective.

Karen Whalley Hammell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that perceptions of diminished quality of life among people with a severe physical impairment might be a consequence of environmental barriers and inequity of opportunity rather than the impairment itself. However, occupational therapists remain preoccupied with assessing and addressing individual dysfunctions and have directed little attention to assessing and challenging inequitable environmental constraints on people's occupational opportunities.
PURPOSE: To highlight briefly what is known about environmental impacts on quality of life among people with impairments; to outline the relationship between occupational rights and human rights; to explore the concept of 'participation' and thereafter to outline the relevance of the Capabilities Approach for occupational therapists who seek to address inequalities of occupational opportunity and inequities in participation. MAIN
FINDINGS: Sen's Capabilities Approach focuses on equality of the opportunity to 'do', and is relevant to occupational therapy in the context of the World Health Organisation's construct of 'participation', the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and the World Federation of Occupational Therapists' (WFOT) Position Statement on Human Rights. PRINCIPAL
CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of Sen's Capabilities Approach might facilitate critical occupational therapy practices focussed on equality of occupational opportunities and on the fulfilment of occupational rights, in accordance with the standards of rights-based practices advocated by disability scholars, WFOT and the UN.
© 2015 Occupational Therapy Australia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  capabilites approach; convention on the rights of persons with disabilities; human rights

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25656544     DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J        ISSN: 0045-0766            Impact factor:   1.856


  5 in total

1.  Persons with intellectual and multiple disabilities activate via non-verbal responses a smartphone's Google Assistant to access preferred stimulation.

Authors:  Giulio E Lancioni; Nirbhay N Singh; Mark F O'Reilly; Jeff Sigafoos; Gloria Alberti; Francesca Campodonico; Giusy Acquaviva; Valeria Chiariello; Lorenzo Desideri
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2020-09-29

Review 2.  Currency and Competence of Occupational Therapists and Consumers with Rapidly Changing Technology.

Authors:  Emily J Steel; Ricky Buchanan; Natasha Layton; Erin Wilson
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 1.448

3.  Experiences with rehabilitation and impact on community participation among adults with physical disability in Colombia: perspectives from stakeholders using a community based research approach.

Authors:  María Luisa Toro-Hernández; Alejandra Mondragón-Barrera; Sara Múnera-Orozco; Laura Villa-Torres; Wendy Camelo-Castillo
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-06-03

4.  Occupational justice and social inclusion in mental illness and HIV: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Clement Nhunzvi; Lisa Langhaug; Edwin Mavindidze; Richard Harding; Roshan Galvaan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Case Study: Degree of Integration of Disability Rights Into Allied Health Professional Education.

Authors:  Claire Bowley; Ann-Mason Furmage; Kanchan Marcus; Stephanie D Short
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  2018-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.