Literature DB >> 25656266

Is label-free LC-MS/MS ready for biomarker discovery?

Marianne Sandin1, Aakash Chawade, Fredrik Levander.   

Abstract

Label-free LC-MS methods are attractive for high-throughput quantitative proteomics, as the sample processing is straightforward and can be scaled to a large number of samples. Label-free methods therefore facilitate biomarker discovery in studies involving dozens of clinical samples. However, despite the increased popularity of label-free workflows, there is a hesitance in the research community to use it in clinical proteomics studies. Therefore, we here discuss pros and cons of label-free LC-MS/MS for biomarker discovery, and delineate the main prerequisites for its successful employment. Furthermore, we cite studies where label-free LC-MS/MS was successfully used to identify novel biomarkers, and foresee an increased acceptance of label-free techniques by the proteomics community in the near future.
© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Label-free; Mass spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25656266     DOI: 10.1002/prca.201400202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl        ISSN: 1862-8346            Impact factor:   3.494


  15 in total

1.  Quality Assessments of Long-Term Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Breast Cancer Xenograft Tissues.

Authors:  Jian-Ying Zhou; Lijun Chen; Bai Zhang; Yuan Tian; Tao Liu; Stefani N Thomas; Li Chen; Michael Schnaubelt; Emily Boja; Tara Hiltke; Christopher R Kinsinger; Henry Rodriguez; Sherri R Davies; Shunqiang Li; Jacqueline E Snider; Petra Erdmann-Gilmore; David L Tabb; R Reid Townsend; Matthew J Ellis; Karin D Rodland; Richard D Smith; Steven A Carr; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Hui Zhang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 2.  The omic approach to parasitic trematode research-a review of techniques and developments within the past 5 years.

Authors:  Orçun Haçarız; Gearóid P Sayers
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 3.  Biomarker discovery in mass spectrometry-based urinary proteomics.

Authors:  Samuel Thomas; Ling Hao; William A Ricke; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Development of biomarkers of genitourinary cancer using mass spectrometry-based clinical proteomics.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Chen; Cheng-Han Tsai; Chien-Lun Chen; Jau-Song Yu; Ying-Hsu Chang
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 6.157

5.  Sipa1l1 is an early biomarker of liver fibrosis in CCl4-treated rats.

Authors:  Santiago Marfà; Manuel Morales-Ruiz; Denise Oró; Jordi Ribera; Guillermo Fernández-Varo; Wladimiro Jiménez
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.422

Review 6.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomic and Proteomic Strategies in Organic Acidemias.

Authors:  Esther Imperlini; Lucia Santorelli; Stefania Orrù; Emanuela Scolamiero; Margherita Ruoppolo; Marianna Caterino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Integrated proteomics and network analysis identifies protein hubs and network alterations in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Cheng Ma; Marla Gearing; Peng George Wang; Lih-Shen Chin; Lian Li
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 7.801

Review 8.  Approaches to the discovery of non-invasive urinary biomarkers of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrej Jedinak; Kevin R Loughlin; Marsha A Moses
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-21

9.  Comparative Secretome Analyses of Mycoplasma bovis Virulent and Attenuated Strains Revealed MbovP0145 as a Promising Diagnostic Biomarker.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Guyue Hu; Doukun Lu; Gang Zhao; Yiqiu Zhang; Muhammad Zubair; Yingyu Chen; Changmin Hu; Xi Chen; Jianguo Chen; Huanchun Chen; Liguo Yang; Aizhen Guo
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Quantitative analysis of gene expression in fixed colorectal carcinoma samples as a method for biomarker validation.

Authors:  Beata Ostasiewicz; Paweł Ostasiewicz; Kamila Duś-Szachniewicz; Katarzyna Ostasiewicz; Piotr Ziółkowski
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.