Literature DB >> 2565582

Placebo-controlled study on acute and subchronic effects of buspirone vs bromazepam utilizing psychomotor and cognitive assessments in healthy volunteers.

K Schaffler1, W Klausnitzer.   

Abstract

The acute and subchronic effects of orally administered buspirone (acute: 15 mg; subchronic: 5 mg t.i.d.; Day 7:5 mg) and bromazepam (acute: 6 mg; subchronic: 2 mg t.i.d.; Day 7: 2 mg) on psychomotor and cognitive parameters were explored vs placebo in a randomized, double-blind crossover design with three periods in 12 healthy male volunteers. The washout periods between active treatments lasted one week. Psychomotor and cognitive measurements were taken with the Oculodynamic Text (ODT), which is a computerized psychophysiological online testing device for the simultaneous measurement of electrooculographic and performance (signal identification) parameters. Subjective side effects were recorded with a symptom checklist (41 items) with regard to the first and seventh day of administration. Intradiurnal assessments were done at 0, +1, +3, and +5 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 7 of each of the three randomized treatment periods. Buspirone behaved placebo-like in the EOG and signal-identification parameters after acute and subchronic administration. After bromazepam the respective parameters were significantly impaired--acutely as well as subchronically. Acute and subchronic buspirone was significantly superior to bromazepam with regard to the majority of psychophysiological parameters. The incidence of acute side effects was higher for both active treatments than for placebo. With buspirone there were fewer acute and subchronic side effects than with bromazepam. The side effect profiles of the three preparations were different. With regard to all active treatments the incidence of side effects was lower on Day 7 after the subchronic dosing period--with a third of the subchronic dose--than after the first single administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2565582     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1014573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry        ISSN: 0176-3679            Impact factor:   5.788


  6 in total

1.  Influences of dimethindene maleate in a new formulation on oculo and psychomotor performance using the oculodynamic test (ODT) in volunteers.

Authors:  K Schaffler; C H Wauschkuhn; M Martinelli; D Rehn; H Brunnauer
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1994-06

2.  Voltage-clamp evidence of GABAA receptor subunit-specific effects: pharmacodynamic fingerprint of chlornordiazepam, the major active metabolite of mexazolam, as compared to alprazolam, bromazepam, and zolpidem.

Authors:  Hélder Fernandes; Vânia Batalha; Ellen Braksator; Simon Hebeisen; Maria João Bonifácio; Maria Augusta Vieira-Coelho; Patrício Soares-da-Silva
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 3.  Biomarkers for the effects of benzodiazepines in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S J de Visser; J P van der Post; P P de Waal; F Cornet; A F Cohen; J M A van Gerven
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  The use of microcomputer-based psychomotor tests for the evaluation of benzodiazepine effects on human performance: a review with emphasis on temazepam.

Authors:  G W Kunsman; J E Manno; B R Manno; C M Kunsman; M A Przekop
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Single dose human pharmacology of umespirone.

Authors:  R L Holland; K Wesnes; B Dietrich
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  Pharmacological treatment effects on eye movement control.

Authors:  James L Reilly; Rebekka Lencer; Jeffrey R Bishop; Sarah Keedy; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.