Literature DB >> 25655608

Imaging of non-Hodgkin lymphomas: diagnosis and response-adapted strategies.

Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly1, Martin Hutchings.   

Abstract

Optimal lymphoma management requires accurate pretreatment staging and reliable assessment of response, both during and after therapy. Positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (PET/CT) combines functional and anatomical imaging and provides the most sensitive and accurate methods for lymphoma imaging. New guidelines for lymphoma imaging and recently revised criteria for lymphoma staging and response assessment recommend PET/CT staging, treatment monitoring, and response evaluation in all FDG-avid lymphomas, while CT remains the method of choice for non-FDG-avid histologies. Since interim PET imaging has high prognostic value in lymphoma, a number of trials investigate PET-based, response-adapted therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). PET response is the main determinant of response according to the new response criteria, but PET/CT has little or no role in routine surveillance imaging, the value which is itself questionable. This review presents from a clinical point of view the evidence for the use of imaging and primarily PET/CT in NHL before, during, and after therapy. The reader is given an overview of the current PET-based interventional NHL trials and an insight into possible future developments in the field, including new PET tracers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25655608     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13150-4_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Res        ISSN: 0927-3042


  4 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET/MRI in patients suffering from lymphoma: how much MRI information is really needed?

Authors:  Julian Kirchner; Cornelius Deuschl; Johannes Grueneisen; Ken Herrmann; Michael Forsting; Philipp Heusch; Gerald Antoch; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  A novel non-Hodgkin lymphoma murine model closer to the standard clinical scenario.

Authors:  Thais Bascuas; María Moreno; Amy Mónaco; Laura Reyes; Andrea Paolino; Patricia Oliver; María G Kramer; Henry Engler; José P Pacheco; Sofía Grille; José A Chabalgoity
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.531

3.  Inter-Observer Agreement of Whole-Body Computed Tomography in Staging and Response Assessment in Lymphoma: The Lugano Classification.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Sameh Shamaa; Mahmoud Abdel Lattif; Hanan Hamid Yousef
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-23

Review 4.  Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Tumor Cell Metabolism and Application to Therapy Response Monitoring.

Authors:  Amarnath Challapalli; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.