Literature DB >> 25654470

Ineffectiveness of remote ischemic renal preconditioning in a porcine solitary-kidney model.

Selhattin Bedir1, Yunbo Ma, Jodi Antonelli, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Jeffrey C Gahan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our study sought to demonstrate the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (R-IPC) on renal function in a large animal (porcine) solitary-kidney model.
METHODS: Twelve pigs were assigned to two groups: Each underwent a right nephrectomy followed by a week of recovery. Group 1 (No-IPC) underwent left renal hilar clamping for 90 minutes. Group 2 underwent right and left iliac artery clamping for 10 minutes each (R-IPC), followed by left hilar clamping for 90 minutes. Serum creatinine was drawn for both groups before ischemia (preoperative), then at 6 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days after. Kidneys were harvested at 24 hours or 7 days for histologic analysis, and the degree of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) or lymphocyte invasion was quantified.
RESULTS: Paired serum creatinine values were analyzed between time points. For Group 1, paired differences existed at 24 hours (P=0.008) but not at 3 days or 7 days. For Group 2, paired differences existed at 24 hours (P=0.006) but not at 3 days or 7 days. The mean preoperative serum creatinine level was similar between groups (P>0.05). The change in serum creatinine level was not significantly different between groups at any time point. Histologic analysis revealed rare evidence of ATN at 24 hours in Group 2, but not in Group 1. At 7 days, neither group showed ATN, and both showed 1-2+evidence of lymphocytic infiltrates.
CONCLUSION: R-IPC in a solitary-kidney porcine model does not confer renal protection from warm ischemia either as evidenced by renal function measures or on histologic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25654470     DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

Review 1.  Preconditioning against renal ischaemia reperfusion injury: the failure to translate to the clinic.

Authors:  Dermot O'Kane; Graham S Baldwin; Damien M Bolton; Joseph J Ischia; Oneel Patel
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  No Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning Strategies on Recovery from Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Protective Molecular Mediators.

Authors:  Casper Kierulf-Lassen; Marie Louise Vindvad Kristensen; Henrik Birn; Bente Jespersen; Rikke Nørregaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Improving the outcome of kidney transplantation by ameliorating renal ischemia reperfusion injury: lost in translation?

Authors:  T C Saat; E K van den Akker; J N M IJzermans; F J M F Dor; R W F de Bruin
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Can remote ischemic preconditioning counteract the renal functional deterioration attributable to partial nephrectomy under warm ischemia? Results of an animal study.

Authors:  Tuna Till Mut; Ömer Acar; Ayse Armutlu; Said Incir; Annemarie Uhlig; Lale A Ertuglu; Melis Özel; Ali Cihan Taskin; Dilek Ertoy Baydar; Mehmet Kanbay; Tarık Esen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.388

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.