Literature DB >> 2565430

Working for which patients and at what cost?

G Bevan1, W Holland, N Mays.   

Abstract

The Government's white-paper Working for Patients proposes introducing a system in which publicly financed resources for hospital and community health services will be distributed to districts and general practitioners with practice budgets for them to choose between competing providers from both the public and private sectors. The NHS Management Board in 1986 observed that such a system would be costly and impractical and would require careful pilot work in situations where its benefits are likely to outweight its costs. This paper shows that there is no reason for changing that judgement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2565430     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92519-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  4 in total

Review 1.  Measuring performance in clinical rheumatology.

Authors:  D L Scott; I Haslock
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Variations in lengths of stay and rates of day case surgery: implications for the efficiency of surgical management.

Authors:  M Morgan; R Beech
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Fundholding in the south Thames Region.

Authors:  R H Corney; S Kerrison
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Fundholding in northern region: the first year.

Authors:  J Newton; M Fraser; J Robinson; D Wainwright
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-02-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.