Literature DB >> 25654295

Relationship between patient-reported outcomes of elective surgery and hospital and consultant volume.

Mira Varagunam1, Andrew Hutchings, Nick Black.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyze the relationship for 3 elective operations between outcome [patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for functional status, health-related quality of life, and postoperative complications] and both hospital and consultant volume.
METHODS: Hospitals (NHS and independent) and consultants undertaking at least 10 NHS-funded procedures during 2011/2012 were included (230 hospitals for hip and knee replacement, 257 for hernia repair; 978 consultants for hip replacement, 1172 for knee replacement, and 1288 for hernia repair). Outcomes (disease-specific and generic PROMs, patient-reported complications) were available from the NHS National PROMs Programme for 2009/2010 to 2011/2012. Relationship between case-mix adjusted outcomes and volume investigated using multilevel modeling.
RESULTS: There was considerable variation in hospital volumes (about 10-fold) and consultant volumes (about 5-fold). No significant association was observed between hospital volume and outcome for all 3 procedures. For consultant volume, there was no significant association for knee replacement or hernia repair. However, outcomes were statistically significantly better for hip replacement, although the effect was of little clinical significance: an additional 10 cases was associated with a higher Oxford Hip Score (0.06), higher EQ-5D score (0.001), and lower odds ratio of complications (0.992).
CONCLUSIONS: There are unlikely to be any benefits to patients from centralization of elective surgery into higher volume hospitals as regards the effectiveness of surgery or the avoidance of minor complications. There is some evidence that very low volume consultants achieve poorer outcomes than higher volume colleagues but the difference is slight and of little or no clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25654295     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  11 in total

1.  Quality of life and frailty outcomes following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Timothy Luke Surman; John Matthew Abrahams; Jaewon Kim; Hayley Elizabeth Surman; Ross Roberts-Thomson; Joseph Matthew Montarello; James Edwards; Michael Worthington; John Beltrame
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Trigeminal neuralgia--a coherent cross-specialty management program.

Authors:  Tone Heinskou; Stine Maarbjerg; Per Rochat; Frauke Wolfram; Rigmor Højland Jensen; Lars Bendtsen
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 7.277

3.  Location, quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from England 2002-2013.

Authors:  Giuseppe Moscelli; Luigi Siciliani; Nils Gutacker; Hugh Gravelle
Journal:  Reg Sci Urban Econ       Date:  2016-09

4.  Should interventions to reduce variation in care quality target doctors or hospitals?

Authors:  Nils Gutacker; Karen Bloor; Chris Bojke; Kieran Walshe
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies.

Authors:  N Black; L Burke; C B Forrest; U H Ravens Sieberer; S Ahmed; J M Valderas; S J Bartlett; J Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The effectiveness of providing peer benchmarked feedback to hip replacement surgeons based on patient-reported outcome measures--results from the PROFILE (Patient-Reported Outcomes: Feedback Interpretation and Learning Experiment) trial: a cluster randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Maria B Boyce; John P Browne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Determinants of patient satisfaction and their willingness to return after primary total hip replacement: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tom Schaal; Tonio Schoenfelder; Joerg Klewer; Joachim Kugler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Choice of hospital: Which type of quality matters?

Authors:  Nils Gutacker; Luigi Siciliani; Giuseppe Moscelli; Hugh Gravelle
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.804

9.  Associations between utilization rates and patients' health: a study of spine surgery and patient-reported outcomes (EQ-5D and ODI).

Authors:  Jan Håkon Rudolfsen; Tore K Solberg; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Jan Abel Olsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Is there a volume-quality relationship within the independent treatment centre sector? A longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Florien Margareth Kruse; M C van Nieuw Amerongen; I Borghans; A S Groenewoud; E Adang; P P T Jeurissen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.