| Literature DB >> 25654132 |
Rashid Mahmood1, Faiza Sharif1, Sikander Ali2, Muhammad Umar Hayyat1.
Abstract
A bacterial consortium BMP1/SDSC/01 consisting of six isolates was isolated from textile effected soil, sludge, and textile effluent from Hudiara drain near Nishat Mills Limited, Ferozepur Road, Lahore, Pakistan. It was selected because of being capable of degrading and detoxifying red, green, black, and yellow textile dyes. The pH and supplements were optimized to enhance the decolorization ability of the selected consortium. The results indicated that decolorizing ability of consortium for the red, green, black, and yellow dyes was higher as compared to individual strains. The consortium was able to decolorize 84%, 84%, 85%, 85%, and 82% of 200 ppm of red, green, black, yellow, and mixed dyes within 24 h while individual strain required 72 h. On supplementing urea, the consortium decolorized 87, 86, 89, 86, and 83%, respectively, while on supplementing sodium chloride the consortium decolorized 93, 94, 93, 94, and 89% of red, green, black, yellow, and mixed dyes, respectively, which was maximum while in the presence of ascorbic acid and ammonium chloride it showed intermediate results. The effect of untreated and treated dyes was investigated on Zea mays L. (maize) and Sorghum vulgare Pers. (sorghum). This study will help to promote an efficient biotreatment of textile effluents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25654132 PMCID: PMC4306213 DOI: 10.1155/2015/628195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Effect of pH (a), supplements (b), and sodium chloride (c) on decolorizing ability of consortium.
Figure 2Effects of textile dyes: red (a), green (b), black (c), and yellow (d) before and after the degradation on germination of maize and sorghum.
Phytotoxicity test of different treated and untreated textile dyes.
| Treatments | Maize | Sorghum | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plumule (cm) | Radicle (cm) | Plumule (cm) | Radicle (cm) | |
| Control (irrigation water) | 20 ± 0.64 | 6 ± 0.96 | 22 ± 1.14 | 6 ± 0.68 |
| Red dye | 5 ± 0.08 | 2 ± 0.11 | 3 ± 0.22 | 2 ± 0.024 |
| Degraded red dye | 14 ± 0.79 | 4 ± 0.04 | 7 ± 0.30 | 4.2 ± 0.15 |
| Green dye | 6.5 ± 0.59 | 3 ± 0.02 | 4.3 ± 0.81 | 2.3 ± 0.11 |
| Degraded green dye | 15 ± 1.3 | 5 ± 0.31 | 7.5 ± 1.01 | 5.4 ± 1.04 |
| Black dye | 4.5 ± 0.48 | 2 ± 0.040 | 3.5 ± 0.38 | 2.9 ± 0.12 |
| Degraded black dye | 12.5 ± 1.40 | 4.5 ± 0.63 | 7.5 ± 0.79 | 4.9 ± 1.04 |
| Yellow dye | 5 ± 0.41 | 2 ± 0.027 | 4.1 ± 0.52 | 2.4 ± 0.28 |
| Degraded yellow dye | 13 ± 0.72 | 5.2 ± 0.14 | 7.1 ± 0.46 | 5.4 ± 1.05 |
Decolorization rate of different bacterial consortium.
| Sr. number | Consortium/bacteria | Decolorization rate (mg/h) | Name of dye | Reported by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 5.55 | Reactive Red 180 | Wang et al. [ |
|
| ||||
| 2 | Consortium GR ( | 1.60 | Azo dye Scarlet R | Saratale et al. [ |
|
| ||||
| 3 | Consortium DAS (3 strains of | 0.43 | Reactive Orange 16 | Jadhav et al. [ |
|
| ||||
| 4 | Consortium CM-4 ( | 2.08 | Crystal violet | Cheriaa et al. [ |
|
| ||||
| 5 | Consortium CM-4 ( | 2.08 | Malachite Green | Cheriaa et al. [ |
|
| ||||
| 6 |
| 0.83 | Reactive Black 5 | Wang et al. [ |
|
| ||||
| 7 |
| 0.91 | Golden Yellow HER | Gomare et al. [ |
|
| ||||
| 8 | Consortium BMP1/SDSC/01 | 7.00 | Red | Present Study |
|
| ||||
| Consortium BMP1/SDSC/01 | 7.00 | Green | Present Study | |
|
| ||||
| Consortium BMP1/SDSC/01 | 7.08 | Black | Present Study | |
|
| ||||
| Consortium BMP1/SDSC/01 | 7.08 | Yellow | Present Study | |
| Sr. number | Dyes | Chemical class |
λmax
| Decolonization (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation time | ||||||||||
| 72 h | 24 h | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Consortium | ||||
| 1 | Red | Carmine acid | 510 | 74 | 76 | 75 | 79 | 78 | 77 | 84 |
| 2 | Green | Benzenesulfonate | 340 | 76 | 75 | 79 | 76 | 79 | 78 | 84 |
| 3 | Black | Monoazo | 510 | 73 | 74 | 74 | 77 | 77 | 79 | 85 |
| 4 | Yellow | Monoazo | 410 | 76 | 74 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 79 | 85 |
| Sr. number | Dyes | Formal name | Chemical structure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Red | Carmine Red |
|
|
| |||
| 2 | Green | Light Green |
|
|
| |||
| 3 | Black | Eriochrome Black T |
|
|
| |||
| 4 | Yellow | Metanil Yellow |
|