| Literature DB >> 25653585 |
Sherry-Ann Brown1, Louise D McCullough2, Leslie M Loew3.
Abstract
Hereditary ataxia, or motor incoordination, affects approximately 150,000 Americans and hundreds of thousands of individuals worldwide with onset from as early as mid-childhood. Affected individuals exhibit dysarthria, dysmetria, action tremor, and diadochokinesia. In this review, we consider an array of computational studies derived from experimental observations relevant to human neuropathology. A survey of related studies illustrates the impact of integrating clinical evidence with data from mouse models and computational simulations. Results from these studies may help explain findings in mice, and after extensive laboratory study, may ultimately be translated to ataxic individuals. This inquiry lays a foundation for using computation to understand neurobiochemical and electrophysiological pathophysiology of spinocerebellar ataxias and may contribute to development of therapeutics. The interdisciplinary analysis suggests that computational neurobiology can be an important tool for translational neurology.Entities:
Keywords: Purkinje; computational; homer; inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 1; model; neurology; spinocerebellar ataxia; translational
Year: 2015 PMID: 25653585 PMCID: PMC4300942 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1Translational neurology: ataxia. SCA mouse observations and human SCA findings are incorporated into the computational framework SCA modeling suite. The models help interpret experimental and clinical findings. The models also predict interactions between proteins and emergent properties that can be borne out in novel mouse experiments. Results from the laboratory and clinical observations can be used to validate, disprove, or tweak the computational models. Findings from mouse experiments can also ultimately be translated to human studies, leading to clinical trials to test therapeutics. The final step in translational neurology with the example of ataxia is implementation of the iterative findings in patient care. The solid square bracket highlights the components addressed directly by computational systems neurobiology (Brown et al., 2012; Brown and Loew, 2012).
Examples of contributions of computational systems neurobiology to translational neurology.
| Source of requisite IP3 | PIP2 synthesis concurrent with hydrolysis | IP3 production in neuroblastoma cells | Xu et al., |
| Purkinje spine electrophysiology | D-type K and class-E Ca channels required | Purkinje neuron current clamp | Miyasho et al., |
| Biochemical-electrical cross-talk | Emergent cross-signaling properties | Biochemical before electrical changes in SCA2 mice | Brown and Loew, |
| AMPAR all-or-none activation | MAPK-PKC positive feedback loop | Purkinje stimulation by CFs/PFs | Ogasawara et al., |
| Local PIP2 sequestration | Fine-tunes coincidence detection | Purkinje stimulation by CFs/PFs | Brown et al., |
| Coincidence detection | 50–100 ms time window CF before PF | Purkinje stimulation by CFs/PFs | Brown et al., |
| IP3R1 compensation | IP3R1 downregulation in polyQ disorders with IP3R1 supersensitivity | IP3R1 (and other members of the signaling complex | Brown and Loew, |
(Supplementary Material, .