Literature DB >> 25653228

Hemodynamics in growing and stable cerebral aneurysms.

Daniel M Sforza1, Kenichi Kono2, Satoshi Tateshima3, Fernando Viñuela3, Christopher Putman4, Juan R Cebral1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The detailed mechanisms of cerebral aneurysm evolution are poorly understood but are important for objective aneurysm evaluation and improved patient management. The purpose of this study was to identify hemodynamic conditions that may predispose aneurysms to growth.
METHODS: A total of 33 intracranial unruptured aneurysms longitudinally followed with three-dimensional imaging were studied. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics models were constructed and used to quantitatively characterize the hemodynamic environments of these aneurysms. Hemodynamic characteristics of growing (n=16) and stable (n=17) aneurysms were compared. Logistic regression statistical models were constructed to test the predictability of aneurysm growth by hemodynamic features.
RESULTS: Growing aneurysms had significantly smaller shear rate ratios (p=0.01), higher concentration of wall shear stress (p=0.03), smaller vorticity ratios (p=0.01), and smaller viscous dissipation ratios (p=0.01) than stable aneurysms. They also tended to have larger areas under low wall shear stress (p=0.06) and larger aspect ratios (p=0.18), but these trends were not significant. Mean wall shear stress was not significantly different between growing and stable aneurysms. Logistic regression models based on hemodynamic variables were able to discriminate between growing and stable aneurysms with a high degree of accuracy (94-100%).
CONCLUSIONS: Growing aneurysms tend to have complex intrasaccular flow patterns that induce non-uniform wall shear stress distributions with areas of concentrated high wall shear stress and large areas of low wall shear stress. Statistical models based on hemodynamic features seem capable of discriminating between growing and stable aneurysms. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysms; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Hemodynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25653228     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  12 in total

1.  A Framework for Comparing Vascular Hemodynamics at Different Points in Time.

Authors:  J Gounley; M Vardhan; A Randles
Journal:  Comput Phys Commun       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.390

2.  Hemodynamics of Focal Versus Global Growth of Small Cerebral Aneurysms.

Authors:  Paolo Machi; Rafik Ouared; Olivier Brina; Pierre Bouillot; Hasan Yilmaz; Maria I Vargas; Renato Gondar; Philippe Bijlenga; Karl O Lovblad; Zsolt Kulcsár
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Contemporary management of brain arteriovenous malformations in mainland China: a web-based nationwide questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Xiangyu Meng; Li Ma; Yang Zhao; Ye Gu; Hengwei Jin; Dezhi Gao; Youxiang Li; Shibin Sun; Ali Liu; Yuanli Zhao; Xiaolin Chen; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2020-09-01

4.  Interrater Reliability in the Measurement of Flow Characteristics on Color-Coded Quantitative DSA of Brain AVMs.

Authors:  K H Narsinh; K Mueller; J Nelson; J Massachi; D C Murph; A Z Copelan; S W Hetts; V V Halbach; R T Higashida; A A Abla; M R Amans; C F Dowd; H Kim; D L Cooke
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Comparing Morphology and Hemodynamics of Stable-versus-Growing and Grown Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  E L Leemans; B M W Cornelissen; C H Slump; C B L M Majoie; J R Cebral; H A Marquering
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Identification of Hostile Hemodynamics and Geometries of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  B J Chung; F Mut; C M Putman; F Hamzei-Sichani; W Brinjikji; D Kallmes; C M Jimenez; J R Cebral
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Risk factors for hemorrhage of brain arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  Sonali S Shaligram; Ethan Winkler; Daniel Cooke; Hua Su
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 8.  Hemodynamics of Cerebral Aneurysms: Connecting Medical Imaging and Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Vitaliy L Rayz; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 11.324

9.  A new cerebral vessel benchmark dataset (CAPUT) for validation of image-based aneurysm deformation estimation algorithms.

Authors:  Daniel Schetelig; Andreas Frölich; Tobias Knopp; René Werner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  PIV investigation of the flow fields in subject-specific vertebro-basilar (VA-BA) junction.

Authors:  Guangyu Zhu; Yuan Wei; Qi Yuan; Jian Yang; Joon Hock Yeo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.