Literature DB >> 25652955

EQOFIX: a combined economic and quality-of-life study of hemophilia B treatments in France.

Benoît Polack1, Thierry Calvez2, Hervé Chambost3, Chantal Rothschild4, Jenny Goudemand5, Ségolène Claeyssens6, Annie Borel-Derlon7, Isabelle Bardoulat8, Frédérique Maurel8, Marie-Christine Woronoff-Lemsi9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EQOFIX is a medicoeconomic study that analyzed the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and costs of care of the moderate and severe forms of hemophilia B, treated on demand or by prophylaxis with either plasma-derived Factor IX (pdFIX) or recombinant FIX (rFIX). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The primary objectives were evaluations of the impact of hemophilia B on HRQoL and of the costs associated with its management. The secondary objectives were evaluations of the clinical efficacy and costs of care of pdFIX and rFIX. In this observational study we included and followed for 1 year severe and moderate hemophilia B patients without inhibitor. HRQoL was evaluated through generic and disease-specific questionnaires. Information on the health resources consumed was collected every 3 months.
RESULTS: The EQOFIX cohort was composed of 155 patients, including 51 children and 104 adults, with 114 having severe disease and 41 having moderate disease. The regimens were prophylactic for 61 and on demand for 94. Altogether, 78 were treated with rFIX and 77 with pdFIX. There was no difference in the QoL between the pdFIX and rFIX treatments. The extra cost of prophylaxis was €22,605 per bleeding event prevented. The consumption of FIX was 1.4-fold higher for the patients treated with rFIX than for the patients treated with pdFIX.
CONCLUSION: Our findings in a cohort composed of 25% of the French population of moderate and severe hemophilia B patients show, with similar clinical and HRQoL results, that treatment with rFIX is more expensive than treatment with pdFIX.
© 2015 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25652955     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  5 in total

Review 1.  Modern Treatments of Haemophilia: Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paolo A Cortesi; Lucia S D'Angiolella; Alessandra Lafranconi; Mariangela Micale; Giancarlo Cesana; Lorenzo G Mantovani
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Gene therapy with adeno-associated virus vector 5-human factor IX in adults with hemophilia B.

Authors:  Wolfgang Miesbach; Karina Meijer; Michiel Coppens; Peter Kampmann; Robert Klamroth; Roger Schutgens; Marco Tangelder; Giancarlo Castaman; Joachim Schwäble; Halvard Bonig; Erhard Seifried; Federica Cattaneo; Christian Meyer; Frank W G Leebeek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Enhanced Factor IX Activity following Administration of AAV5-R338L "Padua" Factor IX versus AAV5 WT Human Factor IX in NHPs.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Spronck; Ying Poi Liu; Jacek Lubelski; Erich Ehlert; Sander Gielen; Paula Montenegro-Miranda; Martin de Haan; Bart Nijmeijer; Valerie Ferreira; Harald Petry; Sander J van Deventer
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 6.698

4.  Medical costs and hospital utilization for hemophilia A and B urban inpatients in China: a national cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zhengwei Huang; Stephen Nicholas; Yong Yang; Xiaoping Chen; Elizabeth Maitland; Yong Ma; Xuefeng Shi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  New developments in the management of moderate-to-severe hemophilia B.

Authors:  Moniba Nazeef; John P Sheehan
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2016-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.