Literature DB >> 25652312

Does magnesium-supplemented cardioplegia reduce cardiac injury? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Lian Duan1, Chun-fang Zhang, Wan-jun Luo, Yang Gao, Ri Chen, Guo-huang Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnesium is often used to supplement cardioplegic solutions during cardiopulmonary bypass due to its cardioprotective effect during ischemia and reperfusion. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of magnesium-supplemented cardioplegia versus an inactive (placebo) control cardioplegia on reducing cardiac injury after cardiac arrest surgery, as found by randomized, controlled trials.
METHODS: The Medline, Cochrane Library, and Chinese literature databases (CJFD, CBM, CSJD, Wanfang) were comprehensively searched for reports of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating magnesium-supplemented cardioplegic solutions. The clinical parameters and outcomes of interest were the incidence of postoperative low cardiac output, auto-rebeating rate, ICU stay length, new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation, peak value of CK-MB (and/or cTnI), incidence of myocardial infarction, and in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: Ten trials, with a total of 1214 patients, were included. The frequency of low cardiac output, inotropic utilization, and myocardial infarction, as well as auto-rebeating rate, length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality, were similar between the two groups. There was a marginal reduction in the incidence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation in the magnesium-supplemented cardioplegia group.
CONCLUSIONS: The advantage of magnesium-supplemented cardioplegia, compared with cardioplegia without magnesium, remains unconvincing based on the current evidence. The decision to add magnesium to the cardioplegic solution to a patient undergoing cardiac arrest surgery should be carefully considered.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25652312     DOI: 10.1111/jocs.12518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  1 in total

1.  Myocardial function after polarizing versus depolarizing cardiac arrest with blood cardioplegia in a porcine model of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Terje Aass; Lodve Stangeland; Christian Arvei Moen; Pirjo-Riitta Salminen; Geir Olav Dahle; David J Chambers; Thomais Markou; Finn Eliassen; Malte Urban; Rune Haaverstad; Knut Matre; Ketil Grong
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.191

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.