Literature DB >> 25652303

Comparison of European (ESR) and American (ACR) white papers on teleradiology: patient primacy is paramount.

Erik R Ranschaert1, Giles W Boland2, Andre J Duerinckx3, Frits H Barneveld Binkhuysen4.   

Abstract

The ACR and European Society of Radiology white papers on teleradiology propose best practice guidelines for teleradiology, with each body focusing on its respective local situation, market, and legal regulations. The organizations have common viewpoints, the most important being patient primacy, maintenance of quality, and the "supplementary" position of teleradiology to local services. The major differences between the white papers are related mainly to the market situation, the use of teleradiology, teleradiologist credentialing and certification, the principles of "international" teleradiology, and the need to obtain "informed consent" from patients. The authors describe these similarities and differences by highlighting the background and context of teleradiology in Europe and the United States.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; Teleradiology; United States; legal issues; patient primacy; regulatory issues; teleradiologic services; white paper

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25652303     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  6 in total

1.  Results of an Italian survey on teleradiology.

Authors:  Francesca Coppola; Corrado Bibbolino; Roberto Grassi; Luisa Pierotti; Roberto Silverio; Francesco Lassandro; Emanuele Neri; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  The Empirical Foundations of Teleradiology and Related Applications: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; James H Thrall; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Imaging Informatics: 25 Years of Progress.

Authors:  J P Agrawal; B J Erickson; C E Kahn
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-06-30

4.  TSR guidelines for the practice of teleradiology: 2021 update.

Authors:  Mustafa N Özmen; Oğuz Dicle; Utku Şenol; Üstün Aydıngöz
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  "From the technology came the idea": safe implementation and operation of a high quality teleradiology model increasing access to timely breast cancer assessment services for women in rural Australia.

Authors:  Karen Johnston; Deborah Smith; Robyn Preston; Rebecca Evans; Karen Carlisle; Janet Lengren; Helen Naess; Elizabeth Phillips; Greg Shephard; Lorraine Lydiard; Debbie Lattimore; Sarah Larkins
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Obstacles and Solutions Driving the Development of a National Teleradiology Network.

Authors:  Leonie Goelz; Holger Arndt; Jens Hausmann; Christian Madeja; Sven Mutze
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.