Literature DB >> 25652220

Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines.

Elisabeth Vas1, Amélie Lescroël2, Olivier Duriez2, Guillaume Boguszewski3, David Grémillet4.   

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly called drones, are being increasingly used in ecological research, in particular to approach sensitive wildlife in inaccessible areas. Impact studies leading to recommendations for best practices are urgently needed. We tested the impact of drone colour, speed and flight angle on the behavioural responses of mallards Anas platyrhynchos in a semi-captive situation, and of wild flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) and common greenshanks (Tringa nebularia) in a wetland area. We performed 204 approach flights with a quadricopter drone, and during 80% of those we could approach unaffected birds to within 4 m. Approach speed, drone colour and repeated flights had no measurable impact on bird behaviour, yet they reacted more to drones approaching vertically. We recommend launching drones farther than 100 m from the birds and adjusting approach distance according to species. Our study is a first step towards a sound use of drones for wildlife research. Further studies should assess the impacts of different drones on other taxa, and monitor physiological indicators of stress in animals exposed to drones according to group sizes and reproductive status.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal behaviour; ecology; ornithology; robot; stress; unmanned aerial vehicles

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25652220      PMCID: PMC4360097          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  3 in total

1.  Rovers minimize human disturbance in research on wild animals.

Authors:  Yvon Le Maho; Jason D Whittington; Nicolas Hanuise; Louise Pereira; Matthieu Boureau; Mathieu Brucker; Nicolas Chatelain; Julien Courtecuisse; Francis Crenner; Benjamin Friess; Edith Grosbellet; Laëtitia Kernaléguen; Frédérique Olivier; Claire Saraux; Nathanaël Vetter; Vincent A Viblanc; Bernard Thierry; Pascale Tremblay; René Groscolas; Céline Le Bohec
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  The eye in the sky: combined use of unmanned aerial systems and GPS data loggers for ecological research and conservation of small birds.

Authors:  Airam Rodríguez; Juan J Negro; Mara Mulero; Carlos Rodríguez; Jesús Hernández-Pliego; Javier Bustamante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Unmanned aerial survey of elephants.

Authors:  Cédric Vermeulen; Philippe Lejeune; Jonathan Lisein; Prosper Sawadogo; Philippe Bouché
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total
  24 in total

1.  Biology goes in the air: Unmanned aerial vehicles offer biologists an efficient tool for observation and sampling from a safe distance.

Authors:  Howard Wolinsky
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Social Integrating Robots Suggest Mitigation Strategies for Ecosystem Decay.

Authors:  Thomas Schmickl; Martina Szopek; Francesco Mondada; Rob Mills; Martin Stefanec; Daniel N Hofstadler; Dajana Lazic; Rafael Barmak; Frank Bonnet; Payam Zahadat
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-24

3.  Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census.

Authors:  Émile Brisson-Curadeau; David Bird; Chantelle Burke; David A Fifield; Paul Pace; Richard B Sherley; Kyle H Elliott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review.

Authors:  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány; Susanne Jenni-Eiermann; Nicolas Strebel; Thomas Sattler; Juan José Negro; Zulima Tablado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Measuring behavioral responses of sea turtles, saltwater crocodiles, and crested terns to drone disturbance to define ethical operating thresholds.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bevan; Scott Whiting; Tony Tucker; Michael Guinea; Andrew Raith; Ryan Douglas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fewer bat passes are detected during small, commercial drone flights.

Authors:  Gabrielle Ednie; David M Bird; Kyle H Elliott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Digital technology and the conservation of nature.

Authors:  Koen Arts; René van der Wal; William M Adams
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition.

Authors:  John F McEvoy; Graham P Hall; Paul G McDonald
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Evaluating behavioral responses of nesting lesser snow geese to unmanned aircraft surveys.

Authors:  Andrew Barnas; Robert Newman; Christopher J Felege; Michael P Corcoran; Samuel D Hervey; Tanner J Stechmann; Robert F Rockwell; Susan N Ellis-Felege
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The Dawning of the Ethics of Environmental Robots.

Authors:  Aimee van Wynsberghe; Justin Donhauser
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.