PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the influence of CYP2C19*17 on R-warfarin clearance as well as the effect of CYP2C19, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 polymorphisms together with non-genetic factors on warfarin international normalized ratio (INR)/daily dose. METHODS: One hundred fifty Caucasian Italian outpatients with data on steady-state plasma concentrations of S- and R-warfarin were genotyped for CYP2C19 (*2, *3, *4, *17), CYP2C9 (*2, *3), CYP2C8*3, and VKORC1*2. The statistical analysis was performed on the effect of genotypes/haplotypes, age, sex, and body weight on the clearance of warfarin enantiomers and dose-normalized INR. RESULTS: R-warfarin clearance was 32% higher in carriers of CYP2C19*17 than in carriers of CYP2C19*2 (mean 2.5 mL/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-2.8 vs. 1.9 mL/min, 95% CI 1.7-2.2; P post hoc = 0.01). Patients with CYP2C19*1/*1 genotype had an intermediate clearance (mean 2.1 mL/min, 95% CI 1.8-2.4). The genotypes of VKORC1, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19, together with non-genetic factors (age, sex, and body weight) explained 52% of the variability in warfarin INR/daily dose, of which CYP2C19 genotypes accounted for 7%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to include the gain-of-function CYP2C19*17 allele when assessing the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the clearance of warfarin enantiomers. CYP2C19 genotypes influenced the clearance of R-warfarin and contributed significantly to the variability in INR/daily dose, indirectly indicating a clinical relevance of R-warfarin.
PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the influence of CYP2C19*17 on R-warfarin clearance as well as the effect of CYP2C19, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and VKORC1 polymorphisms together with non-genetic factors on warfarin international normalized ratio (INR)/daily dose. METHODS: One hundred fifty Caucasian Italian outpatients with data on steady-state plasma concentrations of S- and R-warfarin were genotyped for CYP2C19 (*2, *3, *4, *17), CYP2C9 (*2, *3), CYP2C8*3, and VKORC1*2. The statistical analysis was performed on the effect of genotypes/haplotypes, age, sex, and body weight on the clearance of warfarin enantiomers and dose-normalized INR. RESULTS:R-warfarin clearance was 32% higher in carriers of CYP2C19*17 than in carriers of CYP2C19*2 (mean 2.5 mL/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-2.8 vs. 1.9 mL/min, 95% CI 1.7-2.2; P post hoc = 0.01). Patients with CYP2C19*1/*1 genotype had an intermediate clearance (mean 2.1 mL/min, 95% CI 1.8-2.4). The genotypes of VKORC1, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19, together with non-genetic factors (age, sex, and body weight) explained 52% of the variability in warfarin INR/daily dose, of which CYP2C19 genotypes accounted for 7%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to include the gain-of-function CYP2C19*17 allele when assessing the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the clearance of warfarin enantiomers. CYP2C19 genotypes influenced the clearance of R-warfarin and contributed significantly to the variability in INR/daily dose, indirectly indicating a clinical relevance of R-warfarin.
Authors: P Lenzini; M Wadelius; S Kimmel; J L Anderson; A L Jorgensen; M Pirmohamed; M D Caldwell; N Limdi; J K Burmester; M B Dowd; P Angchaisuksiri; A R Bass; J Chen; N Eriksson; A Rane; J D Lindh; J F Carlquist; B D Horne; G Grice; P E Milligan; C Eby; J Shin; H Kim; D Kurnik; C M Stein; G McMillin; R C Pendleton; R L Berg; P Deloukas; B F Gage Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Sarah C Sim; Carl Risinger; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Eleni Aklillu; Magnus Christensen; Leif Bertilsson; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Stephen E Kimmel; Benjamin French; Scott E Kasner; Julie A Johnson; Jeffrey L Anderson; Brian F Gage; Yves D Rosenberg; Charles S Eby; Rosemary A Madigan; Robert B McBane; Sherif Z Abdel-Rahman; Scott M Stevens; Steven Yale; Emile R Mohler; Margaret C Fang; Vinay Shah; Richard B Horenstein; Nita A Limdi; James A S Muldowney; Jaspal Gujral; Patrice Delafontaine; Robert J Desnick; Thomas L Ortel; Henny H Billett; Robert C Pendleton; Nancy L Geller; Jonathan L Halperin; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael D Caldwell; Robert M Califf; Jonas H Ellenberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven Lane; Sameh Al-Zubiedi; Ellen Hatch; Ivan Matthews; Andrea L Jorgensen; Panos Deloukas; Ann K Daly; B Kevin Park; Leon Aarons; Kayode Ogungbenro; Farhad Kamali; Dyfrig Hughes; Munir Pirmohamed Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: So-Young Kim; Ji-Yeon Kang; Jessica H Hartman; Sun-Ha Park; Drew R Jones; Chul-Ho Yun; Gunnar Boysen; Grover P Miller Journal: Drug Metab Lett Date: 2012-09-01
Authors: Mia Wadelius; Leslie Y Chen; Jonatan D Lindh; Niclas Eriksson; Mohammed J R Ghori; Suzannah Bumpstead; Lennart Holm; Ralph McGinnis; Anders Rane; Panos Deloukas Journal: Blood Date: 2008-06-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: I Fricke-Galindo; C Céspedes-Garro; F Rodrigues-Soares; M E G Naranjo; Á Delgado; F de Andrés; M López-López; E Peñas-Lledó; A LLerena Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.550