Literature DB >> 25652053

Validation of the MSKCC Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Nomogram and Comparison with Other Prognostication Systems: Single-Institution Experience with 289 Patients.

Aik-Yong Chok1, Brian K P Goh2,3, Ye-Xin Koh1, Weng-Kit Lye4, John C Allen4, Richard Quek5, Melissa C C Teo6, Pierce K H Chow1,4, Hock-Soo Ong7, Alexander Y F Chung1, Wai-Keong Wong7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic nomogram in a single-institution cohort of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and to compare its predictive accuracy against other established risk classification systems, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), and Joensuu criteria.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 289 patients who underwent surgical resection for primary localized GISTs without adjuvant imatinib therapy and compared the actuarial recurrence-free survival (RFS) with the predicted RFS.
RESULTS: Tumors >5 cm in size, with high mitotic index, and which had ruptured were significantly associated with recurrent disease. The 2-year RFS was 77.2 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 71.6-81.8], and the 5-year RFS was 67.9 % (95 % CI 61.7-73.4). The concordance probability of the nomogram of 2-year RFS was 0.71 (SE 0.02), and 5-year RFS was 0.71 (SE 0.19). The 2-year and 5-year MSKCC nomogram probability calculations and the AFIP criteria gave a better estimation of RFS compared to the NIH (p < 0.001) and Joensuu (p < 0.001) criteria. There was no significant difference between the predictive accuracy of the nomogram compared to the AFIP criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: The MSKCC nomogram slightly underestimated the probability of RFS after surgical resection of GISTs. It was associated with a significantly better predictive accuracy compared to the NIH and Joensuu. This study suggests that there is a wider than expected prognostic divergence between gastric GISTs versus GISTs arising from the small intestine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25652053     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4400-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

Review 1.  Tailored management of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Mark S Etherington; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Computed tomography features and predictive findings of ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  Jin Sil Kim; Hyun Jin Kim; Seong Ho Park; Jong Seok Lee; Ah Young Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Laparoscopic wedge resection for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Chun Yuet Khoo; Brian K P Goh; Alvin K H Eng; Weng-Hoong Chan; Melissa C C Teo; Alexander Y F Chung; Hock-Soo Ong; Wai-Keong Wong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The GIST of Advances in Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Authors:  Inga-Marie Schaefer; Ronald P DeMatteo; César Serrano
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2022-04

5.  Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of esophagogastric junction: A multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis with propensity score weighting.

Authors:  Wenjun Xiong; Yuting Xu; Tao Chen; Xingyu Feng; Rui Zhou; Jin Wan; Yong Li; Guoxin Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 6.  Update on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors for Radiologists.

Authors:  Sree Harsha Tirumani; Akshay D Baheti; Harika Tirumani; Ailbhe O'Neill; Jyothi P Jagannathan
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications can preoperatively predict breast cancer HER2 and Luminal a molecular subtype.

Authors:  DongZhi Cen; Li Xu; Ningna Li; Zhiguang Chen; Lu Wang; Shuqin Zhou; Biao Xu; Chun Ling Liu; Zaiyi Liu; Tingting Luo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-21

8.  Concordance Rate between Clinicians and Watson for Oncology among Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: Early, Real-World Experience in Korea.

Authors:  Youn I Choi; Jun-Won Chung; Kyoung Oh Kim; Kwang An Kwon; Yoon Jae Kim; Dong Kyun Park; Sung Min Ahn; So Hyun Park; Sun Jin Sym; Dong Bok Shin; Young Saing Kim; Ki Hoon Sung; Jeong-Heum Baek; Uhn Lee
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-02-03

9.  The Effect of Marital Status on Survival of Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A SEER Database Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Song; Chuan Tian
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.