Literature DB >> 25651799

Grouping by similarity is mediated by feature selection: evidence from the failure of cue combination.

Liqiang Huang1.   

Abstract

As one of the most classic gestalt phenomena, grouping is often considered to occur preattentively. Therefore, it seems natural to expect conflicting grouping cues to combine preattentively and to lead to an impression of "no grouping." On the other hand, a recent account suggests that grouping by similarity is mediated by the attentional selection of a feature. This account makes the distinctive prediction that for grouping by similarity, but not for low-level groupings (e.g., connectedness, common region), when two conflicting grouping cues are present, the grouping structure will tend to be driven either by one type of cue or by the other type of cue and will usually not lead to the impression of "no grouping." This predicted pattern of results was confirmed in the present study: the presence of two conflicting low-level grouping cues led to reports of "no grouping" in 73.0 % of the trials, but for two similarity grouping cues, "no grouping" was only reported in 25.5 % of the trials. In summary, although low-level grouping cues do indeed work together to determine the perceptual structure preattentively, grouping by similarity is likely mediated by the attentional selection of a feature.

Keywords:  Attention; Feature selection; Grouping; Grouping cues; Similarity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25651799     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0801-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  The speed of feature-based attention: attentional advantage is slow, but selection is fast.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: a probabilistic model of grouping by proximity and similarity in regular patterns.

Authors:  Michael Kubovy; Martin van den Berg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness.

Authors:  S Palmer; I Rock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

5.  Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects.

Authors:  S L Franconeri; D K Bemis; G A Alvarez
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-08-03

6.  Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  P R Roelfsema; V A Lamme; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention.

Authors:  C M Moore; H Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Multistability in perception.

Authors:  F Attneave
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping.

Authors:  R A Rensink; J T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Common-fate grouping as feature selection.

Authors:  Brian R Levinthal; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-08-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Neurodynamic Model of Feature-Based Spatial Selection.

Authors:  Mateja Marić; Dražen Domijan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-28

2.  When illusions merge.

Authors:  Aline F Cretenoud; Gregory Francis; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.