Jeffrey R DeFlavio1, Stephanie A Rolin2, Benjamin R Nordstrom3, Louis A Kazal4. 1. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. jeffrey.r.deflavio@dartmouth.edu. 2. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. stephanie.a.rolin@dartmouth.edu. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. benjamin.r.nordstrom@hitchcock.org. 4. Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. louis.a.kazal.jr@dartmouth.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Opioid abuse has reached epidemic levels. Evidence-based treatments such as buprenorphine maintenance therapy (BMT) remain underutilized. Offering BMT in primary care settings has the potential to reduce overall costs of care, decrease medical morbidity associated with opioid dependence, and improve treatment outcomes. However, access to BMT, especially in rural areas, remains limited. This article will present a review of barriers to adoption of BMT among family physicians in a primarily rural area in the USA. METHODS: An anonymous survey of family physicians practicing in Vermont or New Hampshire, two largely rural states, was conducted. The survey included both quantitative and qualitative questions, focused on BMT adoption and physician opinions of opioids. Specific factors assessed included physician factors, physicians' understanding of patient factors, and logistical issues. RESULTS: One-hundred and eight family physicians completed the survey. Approximately 10% were buprenorphine prescribers. More than 80% of family physicians felt they regularly saw patients addicted to opiates. The majority (70%) felt that they, as family physicians, bore responsibility for treating opiate addiction. Potential logistical barriers to buprenorphine adoption included inadequately trained staff (88%), insufficient time (80%), inadequate office space (49%), and cumbersome regulations (37%). Common themes addressed in open-ended questions included lack of knowledge, time, or interest; mistrust of people with addiction or buprenorphine; and difficult patient population. CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to quantify perceived barriers to treatment and provide insight expanding the community of family physicians offering BMT. The results suggest family physicians are excellent candidates to provide BMT, as most report regularly seeing opioid-addicted patients and believe that treating opioid addiction is their responsibility. Significant barriers remain, including inadequate staff training, lack of access to addiction experts, and perceived efficacy of BMT. Addressing these barriers may lower resistance to buprenorphine adoption and increase access to BMT in rural areas.
INTRODUCTION: Opioid abuse has reached epidemic levels. Evidence-based treatments such as buprenorphine maintenance therapy (BMT) remain underutilized. Offering BMT in primary care settings has the potential to reduce overall costs of care, decrease medical morbidity associated with opioid dependence, and improve treatment outcomes. However, access to BMT, especially in rural areas, remains limited. This article will present a review of barriers to adoption of BMT among family physicians in a primarily rural area in the USA. METHODS: An anonymous survey of family physicians practicing in Vermont or New Hampshire, two largely rural states, was conducted. The survey included both quantitative and qualitative questions, focused on BMT adoption and physician opinions of opioids. Specific factors assessed included physician factors, physicians' understanding of patient factors, and logistical issues. RESULTS: One-hundred and eight family physicians completed the survey. Approximately 10% were buprenorphine prescribers. More than 80% of family physicians felt they regularly saw patients addicted to opiates. The majority (70%) felt that they, as family physicians, bore responsibility for treating opiate addiction. Potential logistical barriers to buprenorphine adoption included inadequately trained staff (88%), insufficient time (80%), inadequate office space (49%), and cumbersome regulations (37%). Common themes addressed in open-ended questions included lack of knowledge, time, or interest; mistrust of people with addiction or buprenorphine; and difficult patient population. CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to quantify perceived barriers to treatment and provide insight expanding the community of family physicians offering BMT. The results suggest family physicians are excellent candidates to provide BMT, as most report regularly seeing opioid-addictedpatients and believe that treating opioid addiction is their responsibility. Significant barriers remain, including inadequate staff training, lack of access to addiction experts, and perceived efficacy of BMT. Addressing these barriers may lower resistance to buprenorphine adoption and increase access to BMT in rural areas.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alcohol and Drug; Epidemiology; Evidence-based Care; General/Family Practice; Health Needs Assessment; Health Service reform; Medical; Mental Health; North America; Primary Health Care; Psychiatry; Public Health; Qualitative Research
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Stefan G Kertesz; Leslie R M Hausmann; Maria K Mor; Ying Suo; Warren B P Pettey; James H Schaefer; Adi V Gundlapalli; Adam J Gordon Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-02-29
Authors: Erin L Winstanley; Laura R Lander; James H Berry; James J Mahoney; Wanhong Zheng; Jeremy Herschler; Patrick Marshalek; Sheena Sayres; Jay Mason; Marc W Haut Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2019-05-08
Authors: Lawrence Lewis; Christopher R Carpenter; Evan S Schwarz; Randall S Jotte; Corey Waller; Rachel Winograd; Randall Williams; Steven Stenger; Holly Rehder; Shannon Governick; Luis Giuffra Journal: Mo Med Date: 2017 Nov-Dec
Authors: Erik D Storholm; Allison J Ober; Sarah B Hunter; Kirsten M Becker; Praise O Iyiewuare; Chau Pham; Katherine E Watkins Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2017-10-01
Authors: Traci R Rieckmann; Nicholas Gideonse; Amanda Risser; Jennifer E DeVoe; Amanda J Abraham Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.505